In a typical Shakespearean play it often incorporates a great conflict or debate between two characters. As such, we want to divulge into the meanings of these orations and the themes of free will connected in them. In one particular scene in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, we have two orations during the trial between Antonio and Shylock. These orations are the climax to the play, in which the final judgement is based upon who can better speak his case to the Duke, who is the one deciding final action in the case. During this argument we can see the silver lining of both sides, which is shown through allusion and presents the theme of race/ religion that is present in the venetian court. At the start of the trial, we can see the animosity …show more content…
Nearing the end of the trial we see that as Shylock attempts to take his pound of flesh, the men talk about what they could possible do to save Antonio. Both Bassanio and Gratiano said that they would trade their wives’ lives if they would be able to change the decision of Shylock. Although the irony is the fact that both of their wives are in fact there, bringing up the idea of how marriage was thought of at the time. Which like Bassanio, was a way in which wealth could be transferred. This is the idea that all the marriages that happen in the play exist out of convenience or necessity. Which in fact was the reason why Bassanio wanted to marry Portia in the first place. Because he believed that if he did marry her, he would be free of his financial problems. In the case of Graziano he decided to marry Nerissa because he was there when Bassanio proposed to Portia. Nerissa only married Nerissa in order to mirror Bassanio’s actions, which is shown ``You saw…, I beheld...You loved…, I loved`` (III.II.2) indicating that the marriage was out of convenience rather than love.
So in the Merchant of Venice we can see that the relationship between characters can mean something very different. The different thoughts that each character carries is an important part in the play, we can see how religion can be affect one’s quality of life and how marriage is more of a tool for wealth rather than love. Mercy also becomes a silver lining when it was used in order to turn the trial onto Shylock, resulting him converting to Christianity. So we can see how religion and ethics become part of a large story in the Merchant of
In the book, Love and Marriage in Renaissance Europe, Giovanni and Lusanna, written by Gene Brucker, a historian who researched and studied about love and marriage during the Renaissance time period, analysis how social classes in marriage are defined by wealth. He also explains the treatment of men that has an upper class status and how bribery is utilized in the decision making process. Brucker presents an account of a marriage agreement that took place according to Lusanna, but Giovanni denied those claims. The city of Florence was ruled by the Medici family for generations, which held an enormous amount of power beginning with Cosimo, who “dispensed favors to his allies, clients, and creatures in the form of offices, loans, remission
Giovanni does what the man of Renaissance would do - he marries for money. He betrays Lusanna and, as it was expected of him, trades love for power and money. When Lusanna realized that she turned to the church for help. This example illustrates the fact that love and marriage was rather unusual in this era, and Lusanna had unrealistic
Through Brutus, Shakespeare uses delivery, memory, scesis onomaton, and rhetorical questions to explain to readers that although something may seem right, there will always two sides to consider because if they choose the wrong side, it may ruin their life. Everyone in their life has
In the play of Oedipus the King, the author demonstrates tone and diction by representing elements and rhetorical strategies that enhance the audience's imagination. Each of the characters from this play have concerns towards the knowledge they know. The first characters which are Oedipus and the priest seem to be at peace with each other.
The sympathy felt for a character often remains through character revelation. In spite of the change in personality and morals the first impression of the character is not forgotten. Othello who commits violent acts throughout the play ends his life with honour, reminding us he was originally introduced as a respected man of high position. A person can be manipulated by others to act outside of their character, and their emotions can blind them from making good decisions. In the end a person’s true character is reflected upon the way they react to the results of their wrong doing.
Luwam Paulos Botticella ENG2D1-05 June-7-2023 Introduction: Prejudice and identity are recurring themes in literature, offering profound insights into the human condition. John Wyndham's The Chrysalids and William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice both delve into these themes, highlighting the destructive nature of prejudice and the complexities of personal identity. This essay will compare and contrast the theme of prejudice and identity in both works, examining examples from the texts and drawing upon various citations to support the analysis. Through the examination of characters, events, and their respective contexts, we can gain a deeper understanding of the impact of prejudice on individual identities and the quest for acceptance.
Caesar Essay Fate and free will are the two aspects that seem to rule one’s life. They weave their hands into the choices that are made. The way one acts are based on these two important ideologies. Shakespeare approaches these ideas in a way that creates a dual mindset.
One of William Shakespeare’s many famous plays, Romeo and Juliet is a dramatic tragedy that is one of the best examples of Shakespeare’s ability to use rhetorical devices to invoke emotion and persuade the audience. In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare specifically uses abundant personification and juxtaposition along with dramatic irony in Romeo’s soliloquy of act 5, scene 3. These literary devices are used to create a strong underlying rhetorical effect of doom and inevitability in Shakespere’s audience. Multiple times throughout Romeo’s
Throughout life, most people have the chance to make their own decisions. With these decisions, there will either be good or bad outcomes. In the case of Shakespeare’s Macbeth, these decisions lead to a very grave consequence; a tragedy. The main character in the play, aptly named Macbeth, makes some choices that do not match with the morals of mankind.
The common aim of playwrights of any time or location is to capture and hold the attention of their audience; this is what Shakespeare has clearly done. The tragedy of Othello, the Moor of Venice, is one of Shakespeare 's most renowned plays. Through construction of intriguing characters, exploration of universal themes, use of comic relief and a well-written script featuring a compelling plot, Shakespeare ensured the tragedy of Othello would hold the interest of the audience; despite being over four centuries old. It possesses so many conditions that can be accentuated to hit nerves with both a Shakespearean and modern audience. The entire plot of Othello is very much like the attitudes and methods of our modern day society.
Chopin makes her strong statement in this quote from the story. Mrs. Mallard has no one to answer to but herself, and she feels liberated that her husband can no longer control her. During the late nineteenth century, women quite frequently had to suppress themselves to the will of their husbands, or to some other man who had a significant amount of control over their lives. Chopin successfully uses vivid imagery, point of view, and irony that gives a different view of marriage that is not typical of today.
Although the genre of both these plays is so different, characters that are strikingly similar dominate both plays. Shylock from ‘The Merchant of Venice’ and Barabas from ‘The Jew of Malta’ are both wealthy, money minded, materialistic Jews. In The Bible, Barabas was a Jewish murderer and revolutionary who was set free at the time Jesus was crucified. Barabas, from ‘The Jew of Malta’ is named after him. Barabas was a wealthy Jewish tradesman.
The concept of justice varies depending on the country, their cultures, and on individual people. Justice and mercy are important themes in The Merchant of Venice and are supported by quotes in the play; it is clearly seen that these two virtues cannot be achieved simultaneously. Justice calls for “an eye for an eye” and mercy asks for forgiveness and compassion towards the one who did wrong. Using examples from The Merchant of Venice, it can clearly be seen that these two human virtues can not be pursued at the same time. There are various definitions as to what justice truly is.
In the story, “The Merchant of Venice,” there is a character named Shylock. Shylock is a Jewish citizen who lives in Venice, a place where Jewish people are one of the lowest class of citizens. This piece by Shakespeare creates this controversial character that can be viewed as a villain or victim. In this play, through the archetypal lense, we can see that Shylock is a villain because of his hatred and his desire for revenge. Some people may see Shylock as a victim because during the time period in which the story is wrote, jewish people were treated like animals and given nearly no rights or role in society.
Role of women in The Merchant of Venice Women during 16th century had no individual freedom. Despite the fact that a single woman ruled England at the time of Shakespeare, the Elizabethan society was patriarchal. Women were considered the weaker gender and always in need of being protected. Wealthy woman were highly educated but they had no right to have professions while poor women sometimes would turn to prostitution or become servants to survive. The book The Merchant of Venice was settled in Venice because Shakespeare wanted to show that even in the foundation place of Renaissance were prejudicial ideas and woman was considered as a weak character.