Nathaniel Hawthorne Nathaniel Hawthorne was born July 4, 1804 in Salem, Massachusetts. Growing up, he was both reserved and well read. He attended Bowdoin College, against his wishes, and there he met friends Henry Longfellow and Franklin Pierce. Though, he was associated with many transcendentalists, he did not fully agree with transcendentalist thought due to the fact that it overlooked the sin nature of people. He lived in their commune however, in order to save up money for his marriage to Sophia Peabody. He later became companions to Emerson and Thoreau. Throughout his life, Hawthorne pursed his dreams of becoming a writer by creating stories that often contained elements of his Puritan background, New English heritage and cynicism. …show more content…
To Hawthorne, sin was any defiance of God’s law and led to guilt. In one of his private journals he wrote, “There is evil in every human heart, which may remain latent, throughout the whole life; but circumstances may rouse it to activity.” Evil was a dominant force in the lives of men and as a result man’s depravity or corruption they were inevitably going to do wrong. Hawthorne also considered diseases to be the manifestation of sins. He decided that there was no way in escaping the grievances of life except through death. Hawthorne thought that true justice could not be achieved under any system of government, but must take place through Providence, also known as divine intervention. Hawthorne believed that slavery was unjustifiable and wrong, however it was a symptom of man’s imperfections. He did not believe slavery would end with some legislative decree or military force. The problem needed both time and God. He explains his reasoning against the works of abolitionists by …show more content…
Hawthorne concluded that until man’s character was purged by God, it was useless to fight slavery. There would always be nefarious forces in life. If slavery was abolished, another evil would unavoidably take its place. “A person to spend all his life and splendid talents in trying to achieve something naturally impossible- as to make a conquest over nature.” Hawthorne believed that Abolitionists and other reformers were people who were wasting their lives attempting to do what only God could. He did not understand why the opponents of slavery put so much faith in themselves to change the world for the better when really the only person they could have faith in was God. There would always be something wrong with the carnal world they lived in, so there was no use in trying to fix
He argues that slavery bettered the personalities of slaveholders, offered slaves all the necessities to live, and that slaves were reliant and this kept them from rioting in society. fellow
Discussion of the Thesis In the article, “Anti-Slavery before the Revolutionary War,” Sylvia R. Frey focuses on abolitionist thoughts, movements, and works, before the start of the Revolutionary War. In fact, Frey goes on as far as to say that the first acts of rebellion from a slave on the Middle Passage helped to initiate an anti-slavery movement. However, Frey argues that the intellectual movement against slavery had both religious and secular beginnings, and that at times, these two bases were also used to support the arguments of later-developing pro-slavery arguments. Firstly, religion was one of the main themes used by abolitionists to appeal to religious audiences. They used Bible verses as well as refutations of secular pro-slavery arguments.
In paragraph 7 of an excerpt of Frederick Douglass's "Learning to Read and Write," he talks about "regretting [his] own existence." With his skills of literacy and comprehension of English, Douglass overhears people talking about the abolitionists. He listens intently, and over time infers the context of being an abolitionist as "anything wrong in the mind of a slaveholder. " Unfortunately for him, his "dictionary afforded [him] little to no help." Persistent and unabashed, Douglass continues to attempt to decipher the "act of abolishing.
He reminds the audience that, in 1776, many colonists thought it was seditious and dangerous to revolt against the British crown. In 1852, however, he says to say "that America was right, and England wrong, is exceedingly easy.” In the same sense in his time, people consider abolitionism and dangerous and seditious political stance, but like the rebellious subjects, that we now call heroes, he wants to go against what people say for the good of the country. Douglass stays that future generations will consider his anti-slavery stance “patriotic, just, and reasonable” as we think now how the Revolution’s leaders were. To celebrate the white man's freedom from oppression is "inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony" as African Americans are not free and still oppressed by other white Americans; a defilement of American ideals held in the Declaration: democracy, freedom, and equal rights.
Statements, such as these, only added to the fire of the movement, by criticizing the lack of concern the general public seemed to hold towards to mistreatment of slaves. He believed they should have been viewed like human beings, who had the the capability to love and
Nathaniel Hawthorne was a dark romantic author, meaning that he believed that humans are imperfect beings, which contradicted the transcendentalist belief that people are inherently good. This belief is demonstrated throughout the short story.
He argued that it was this practice of bestial treatment and the denial of education that oppressed the slaves and forced them to accept their condition. He wrote, "I have found that, to make a contented slave, it is necessary to make a thoughtless one. It is necessary to darken his moral and mental vision, and, as far as possible, to annihilate the power of reason. He must be able to detect no inconsistencies in slavery; he must be made to feel that slavery is right; and he can be brought to that only when he ceases to be a man" (975).
Nathaniel Hawthorne is one of the most studied and influential writers in history. His many works use symbolism and allegory to portray their purpose, filling them with deep meaning and offering a wide variety of interpretation. Hawthorne was not particularly proud of his family history; he disagreed with some of his ancestors positions in the salem witch trials. He distanced himself with that part of his family and added a “w” to his name to further do so. Hawthorne was born in Salem Massachusetts, which gave him a prevalent theme of puritanism in many of his stories.
Douglass writes, “I have found that, to make a contented slave, it is necessary to make a thoughtless one. It is necessary to darken his moral and mental vision, and, as far as possible, to annihilate the power of reason. He must be able to detect no inconsistencies in slavery;
He points out personal facts about how he feels when he says, “I often found myself regretting my own existence, and wishing myself dead; and but for the hope of being free, I have no doubt but that I should have killed myself or done something foe which I should have been killed”. The words that he uses explains the emotions that he was going through and to build an appeal to emotions. Throughout the time that he has been expanding his knowledge he runs across the word “abolitionist” which means it’s a movement to end slavery. He was always eager for someone to speak about it and he was ready to listen he says, “I did not dare ask anyone about its meaning, for I was satisfied that it was something they wanted me to know very little about”. He says this because he realized that the word is spoken very rarely and he knew if he spoke that word and someone heard him, he could get penalized.
That which is inhuman, cannot be divine!” (19). The “American religion” was used as “a thin vail to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages” (20) and their “prayers and hymns, your sermon and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety and hypocrisy” (20). Hence, Douglass purpose was not to primarily motive to can “American religion” a lie was to emphasize the “national inconsistencies” and bring up change. Douglass also uses the same method when stating that “it [the Constitution] will be found to contain principles and purposes, entirely hostile to the existence of slavery” (38).
As a people, we may assume that Douglass is against the people whom think that they know the Lord, but behind the curtain they have slaves, use women, and abuse children and adults. His friends in the movement of abolition were very strong Christians, who prayed and feared God, but he has many critics as slaveholders who claim to know God but surely they do not. Douglass never cared too much for people whom were both slaveholders and “Christians”. He not only dislikes the hypocrites, he says that the slaveholders are crueler when they are
He points out that in the bible and the constitution the main focus is freedom and liberty. He points out that, even though these two things, mainly the bible are an average document in an American home,freedom and liberty are often disregarded. He states, “Dare to call in question and to denounce …everything that serves to perpetuate slavery”. Basically, he is saying if these are main documents in our country and that are meant to deliver liberty, why we even have to question if slavery is morally okay. He speaks about if a slave should be considered a man, slaveholders acknowledge it in there laws for their government, yet slaves are treated less than men.
He later goes on to say he could hear the cries of chained slaves passing through the docks in the dead of night and it having a profound affect on his psyche. He also points out that the church is not doing its job because it has the power to condemn slavery and their choosing to remain silent on the issue. He brings to light the Fugitive Slave Law, which gives blacks no due process and civil rights. Under this act freed blacks could very well be accused of being a fugitive slave and have to be transported back to the south.
He does not agree with Mrs. Auld teaching Douglass these new things, because he felt the education ruined slaves and ultimately would make them unhappy and unruly. Although Mr. Auld’s word were quite harsh, Douglass took it as words of enlightenment and vowed to win his freedom