Lowering the Drinking Age Picture yourself at this amazing party, you are having the time of your life, but you realize that there are so many people trashed and you are the only one that is not as wasted. The neighbors call the police department complaining that there is so much noise happening next door, that they want the police to shut it down or to at least tell them to be quiet. Well imagine your friend answering the door to the police but saying something incredibly stupid. The cops tell you to turn down the music, they really don’t care that you are eighteen and drinking because they know that it is the legal age. You see, most people would disagree that the drinking age should be eighteen because they think that we are still very
If the legal drinking age was eighteen people wouldn’t feel a thrill of breaking the law to get a drink. “Lowering the legal drinking age would reduce the number of underage people who are hurt from alcohol related injuries or accidents due to fear of legal consequences if they sought medical attention.” (Tracey
Over the years, there have been debates about lowering the drinking age in the United States to eighteen. People argue that if a person can fight in the military or vote in elections, then he or she should be allowed the right to drink alcohol. Others feel that it is not wise to lower the legal drinking age because the results would be dangerous. Although there are arguments for lowering the drinking age, there is also an abundance of research that proves lowering the drinking age would be destructive. The legal drinking age should not be lowered to eighteen because it will give high school and even middle school students greater access to alcohol, interfere with brain development, adult rights begin at twenty-one, and increase traffic accidents among the youth.
Nearly everybody can concur that liquor ought not be given or permitted to youngsters or youthful grown-ups under a particular age. Liquor is a substance that is extremely hazardous and on the off chance that you utilized erroneously or youthfully the outcomes can be extraordinary risk to the clients or the ones around them. The point of bringing down the drinking age has been in dialog for a long time now. Roadway passings among adolescents and youthful grown-ups have expanded enormously.. All states started raising the base drinking age once more. The legitimate drinking age has remained at 21 and ought to remain 21. Despite the fact that the age has been brought down and raised once more, this point has not been settled consistently. Underage drinking, particularly younger than 21, ought not be permitted in any nation since it is exceptionally risky, with regards to wellbeing inconveniences and different dangers, and can be taken under poor conditions where it can be abused or abused. Liquor is the most established and most broadly utilized medication on the planet. When one ends up dependent on it, they utilize this mixed refreshment as a substitute for normal drinking refreshments. It doesn 't take yearn for one to wind up a heavy drinker either. Numerous individuals think liquor is a stimulant, regardless it is a depressant. It backs off the capacity of every living cell, particularly those in the mind. In the event that one is to drink liquor at a youthful age this
If young adults at the age of 18 are old enough to vote and enlist in the army, then why can they not purchase and consume alcohol? Over the years, the set drinking age has been a controversial topic among society. Some people believe the MLDA (Minimum Legal Drinking Age) should stay at the age of 21 because it is safer for their kids. However, lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 would change the standards of alcohol as it encourages those of legal adulthood to make responsible decisions as adults, learn to control binge drinking and promote less automobile accidents.
Why shouldn't the drinking age be lowered to 18 Almost everyone can agree that alcohol should not be given to kids or young adults under a certain age.alcohol is a substance that is very dangerous and if you used it incorrectly the consequences can be great in danger to the users or to the ones around them.there’s many reasons why they drinking age should not be lowered from twenty one to eighteen. Drunk driving has caused a big issue in the United States. Has taken many lives.
Should the legal age for alcohol consumption be lowered? In the United States, The legal drinking age is 21, but in my research, I have found that it is actually allowed, under certain circumstances and situations, to people of even lower age. Though all 50 US states have set their minimum drinking age to 21, exceptions do exist on a state-by-state basis for consumption at home, under adult supervision, for medical necessity, and other reasons. In fact, all but 5 states, Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, New Hampshire, and West Virginia, under age drinking is permitted. Parents are allowed to furnish alcohol to minors if they are under proper supervision. Also bartenders are allowed to drink at 20 years old, which is the lowest legal bartending age.
“About forty percent of college study found that students that reported that they are ‘drinking to get drunk’ Perhaps the discussion that needs to occur is one of why college student feel a need to get drunk.” Binge drinking has became more and more popular throughout the campus but there is no proof that changing the age for 21 to 18 will make that number decrease (Deguits 3). It is also stated that just because of the higher drinking age it doesn't stop all the under aged people from drinking (“Fed: Lifting”). Another impact that has shown a dramatic change for the better is the number of traffic deaths after the age was raised to twenty-one.
Although some say lowering the minimum legal drinking age, or MLDA, will only cause more underage drinking and harm the adolescent brain, the MLDA should be lowered to 18 because the legal age of adulthood is 18, and lowering the legal drinking age will cut down on underage drinking, increase responsible drinking, and decrease drunk driving accidents.
There has been a lot of talk and debate about whether or not the legal drinking age of 21 should be changed to the age of 25. There are many reasons as to why it should and shouldn 't be changed. Many people have different opinions on the issue. In my opinion, I think the drinking age should be raised to 25 due to the irresponsibility of many young adults. There has been many issues with young adults and alcohol when they come together, because of this many of them die and get hurt everyday. Therefore, in this paper I am going to explain and give reasoning as to why changing the legal drinking age of 21 to 25 can save the lives of young adults, give them a healthier lifestyle, help them be safer and live a longer more efficient life.
Since 1984 there has been a federal act that strongly advises states not to allow citizens under the age of 21 from drinking alcoholic beverages. To this day there are still people arguing about this law, both for and against it. Having a minimum drinking age set at 21 is a popular ongoing debate that has many supporters and disputers. To begin, alcohol was a key topic in debates
The article from Journal of Health Economics introduces the impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use. The abuse of alcohol is coming with healthy issue and some considerable spillover effects such as risky behavior, criminal activity, and alcohol related traffic injuries and fatalities. The regulation on alcohol availability in the
In response to MADD, statistics show that over 1,000 lives of 18-24 year-olds are lost annually to alcohol off the highways, a figure that has been increasing since 1998. In addition, sixty percent of the deaths that occur as a result of underage drinking happen off the highways. Approximately one in six teenagers has experienced ‘black out’ spells where they could not remember what happened the previous evening as a result of heavy alcohol use. If the purpose of changing the drinking age from 18 to 21 was to have less injuries and death, then this law has not made a
The reasoning behind the National Minimum Drinking Age Act is flawed, and the passing of this unnecessary law was aided by incorrect facts about teenage drinking and driving used by Senator Lautenberg and his co-sponsors to garner support for their bill. One of the lawmakers’ main arguments included statistics which said that almost 60 percent