Angela Grimke's Bearing Witness Against Slavery

Cultural constructs that are detrimental to the unity and fairness of all are historically marked by social-political movements that cause an upheaval of old systems. During these tense and often conflictual movements, there are certain voices that stand out among the throng of dramatic and biased opinions. During the anti-lynching movement, Ida B. Wells was one of those voices. She utilized her journalistic capacity and position as author to spread her message of dissention against lynching and the unfair prosecution and deaths of African Americans. Her openly uncensored publications, ’Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in all its phases, and ‘The Red

I feel that Grimké 's main purpose when writing her article was that she wanted to inform that we are not just a skin color and women are not just to seen and not heard that people of color and women are human and they have voices that need to be heard and rights that need to be met. I find Grimke very ahead of her time and t be raised in home with slave and look past that is remarkable. I feel Douglass main purpose from his speech was to call out Americans for what they were, hypocrites. He wanted Americans to show their true colors and admit the bias monster they have become who believed in freedom for all but only for the ones that look like them. Douglass as an escaped slave had the knowledge and the right to talk about the injustice and

Sarah Grimke was an advocate for the abolition of slavery. She then began to defend women rights in order to further advance her main purpose of abolition. In her letters she argues against Catharine Beecher’s about the role of women and how they are subordinate to men. Her main arguments were against that women were not subordinate to men by gods rule. she says that god made them equal but then men created classes where they were higher ranked than women. She says that men denied them opportunities such as voting and others and forced women to become less valued than men. She also was very focused on getting rid of the term separate spheres. Her main points were that women and men have equal rights and women should be able to be involved in

Florence Kelly delivered a speech before the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905. She used rhetorical analysis such as pathos, anaphora, and logos to enlist working men to vote for the reform of child labor laws.

It takes courage to stand up for something you believe in if everybody is pushing you the other way. In the two speeches, “Ain’t I a Woman?” by Sojourner Truth and “Untie His Hands” by Frederick Douglass, both authors use the power of voice to persuade people into listening to their cause. Truth’s speech vividly expresses how black women are not treated like white women or given the help they needed and Douglass’s speech expresses frustration on how black people are not given the chance to show their full potential, because their hands are always tied up. While both speeches are extremely persuasive, the context, style, structure and use of rhetoric in Truth’s speech was more effective.

Suffrage means to have the right to vote in political elections. This concept is an ideal meaning for women throughout history, especially for the women population between late 1800’s and early 1900’s. Women suffrage commenced at the Seneca Falls, which later on had escalated to Unions, then led to the 15th and 19th amendment. Of course, the men of that time had belittled the women who believed that they were more than merely the traditional mothers and wives. Although, suffrage is not only just for females, but to the Black population too; both males and females. With determination and the passion burning within them, women and African Americans alike, had reached the right for suffrage.

During the nineteenth century, reform movements in the United States led to an expansion of democratic ideals from 1825 to 1855. Throughout the Antebellum period there was a focus on forming a better individual and society. This was exemplified through the increased interest in religion, medicine, education reforms, transcendentalism, abolitionism, and women’s rights.

The fight for women’s rights was not without good cause. Many saw the hypocrisies of allowing all men – even complete buffoons – the right to vote while educated ladies had no say on the ballot. Divorce laws prevent women from splitting from their spouse unless he agreed to do so. In addition, women could not own property or keep their own paychecks if they worked (see Document 1). These problems of hipocrasy were additionally highlighted when people began to see women doing the same exact work as men on farms and in other job areas (see Document 5). They saw no reason to withhold rights from the opposite sex when they did the same things that men did. When some recognized these issues, they sought to fix them and henceforth created a new standard for ladies – a new way to be considered proper. As this era continued, women’s rights were leaps and bounds ahead of where they had previously stood; however, even by 1897 there was still an issue that had to be tackled for the ladies (see Document 6). The right to vote was endlessly sought after since it would be the only way for women to protect their other newly-gained rights. Ladies continued to protest, lobby Congress, and go on hunger strikes to draw attention to and reach their goal. By 1910, women were not quite equal to men, but they were drawing near. Those that believed the sexes deserved equality continued to fight – men and women

The antislavery convention of American Women in New York City in May 1837 was one of several conventions that were held, addressing the concept of abolition. During this time period, there were several groups of men and women who were interested in getting rid of the institution of slavery, driven by different motives. Document 5, of Chapter 6, contains several of the resolutions established by the women attending the convention regarding the ideas of slavery as a moral wrong, and that people were obligated to perform their duty in helping others achieve their freedom. The women attending the convention, including Angelina Grimké, Sarah Grimké, Mary Cox, Lydia Child, Martha Storrs and many others, were allowed to participate in this convention

The Second Great Awakening was a religious revival that began in the late 18th century and continued until the middle of the 19th century. It occurred mostly in the United States but spread to other countries as well. It was best known for its large camp meetings that led a remarkable number of people to convert to Christianity. This was done through an enthusiastic style of preaching and audience participation. The Second Great Awakening included roles for white women and African Americans in the Christian religion. It also greatly influenced American society by inspiring other reform movements.

Picture this, the year is 1838 and the North has rising opinions about slavery injustice, and realize the public needs to voice their stand on Emancipation. The South, infuriated by the voiced opinions, decide to create mobs to voice their personal opinions on the positives of slavery. These mobs would target public Anti-Slavery movements and take a stand. As terrible as this may seem, Angelina Grimke Weld experienced this first hand. Angelina Grimke was an abolitionist who favored emancipation of slaves and women's rights. Grimke and her sister, Sarah, was born in South Carolina in the heart of a slave-holding plantation. After being raised around the cruelness of slavery, Grimke and her sister decided to take a stand against slavery. After

Frederick Douglass’s narrative provides a first hand experience into the imbalance of power between a slave and a slaveholder and the negative effects it has on them both. Douglass proves that slavery destroys not only the slave, but the slaveholder as well by saying that this “poison of irresponsible power” has a dehumanizing effect on the slaveholder’s morals and beliefs (Douglass 40). This intense amount of power breaks the  kindest heart and changes the slaveholder into a heartless demon (Douglass 40). Yet these are not the only ways that Douglass proves what ill effect slavery has on the slaveholder. Douglass also uses deep characterization, emotional appeal, and religion to present the negative effects of slavery.

There’s no doubt in history that the slave life was the worst fate one could be born into. Even the Southern women, though deeply racist, hated slavery and the paternalism that went with it. Linda Brent in Harriet Jacobs’ account of her life in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl retells the stories of how Linda/Harriet grew up, bounced from mistress to master, learned hard life lessons, and eventually found “freedom.” Meanwhile, Barbara Welter’s article The Cult of True Womanhood shows the values that a Northern free woman held dearly when left to be a “slave” of virtue. An analysis of Welter’s article as well as Harriet Jacobs’ biography of her pseudonym shows how Linda Brent desperately wanted to fulfil the expectations of a white woman,

Women in England during the 1800s faced restrictions to participate in movements and were limited in their political speaking and voting capabilities. Although many women accepted their fate, some fought for a different social role. (“The Women 's Rights Movement”) Women such Mary Wollstonecraft, Jane Austen, and Mary Shelley inspired a new way of radical thinking towards human rights, specifically the rights of women (Surgis). Thanks to these inspiring individuals, there was a change in women’s attitude regarding their options to become part of the work force, gain an education, and have equal rights in marriage (Surgis). Educating women was the primary focus for many modern feminists, explaining that if women were educated the opportunities

The history of women’s struggle for their rights is very long and sometimes seems endless. “The Age of Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries opened up job opportunities for women, released them from domestic confines and provided them with new social freedoms” (Repetto, 2010, p. 178).These improvements would be a platform for further achievements of women in public, including the