Anthony S. Tomasso Professor Rodriguez ENG-101 12 APR 2023 The Struggle Between Juvenile and Adult When we as a society picture what age group is the most innocent and precious, we typically agree on children. When a child commits a serious crime such as: rape, murder, armed robbery, many teeter between sentencing that child as an adult rather than a child. In this essay, “Sentencing Children as Adults” by Terence Gorski (2001) discusses the difference in the Juvenile Justice system and how detrimental it is to not place the juvenile child in that system. “Cruel and Unusual: Sentencing 13- and 14-Year-Old Equal Justice Initiative Children to Die in Prison” by the Equal Justice Initiative (2007) gives a plethora of examples of children sentenced as adults and factors that influence crime at such a young age. Children need the chance to grow and be rehabilitated into …show more content…
If a child is surrounded in violence as they grow up, they are more likely to become violent. If they are surrounded by such negative influence they themselves are more likely to become what they are surrounded by. For example, Ian Manuel was raised in extreme poverty and violence. At the age of four, he was raped by an older sibling. During an armed robbery, he was a part of when he was 13, a woman received a non-fatal gunshot wound and Ian Manuel was sentenced to life in prison. “Now 29, he has spent half his life in a closet-size concrete box, getting his food through a slot in the door, never seeing another inmate, not allowed to read anything but legal and religious materials, so bored that he cuts himself with fragments of a toothpaste tube or a tiny piece of glass. In the past year, he has attempted suicide five times” (Equal Justice Initiative, Pg 12, 2007). Ian Manuel is an example of cruel punishment. Instead of learning from his mistakes and becoming a better person, he wastes away with only pain and
Giving consequences to the juveniles not only allows adolescents to understand what is good and wrong but to care for the victims like Bishop-Jenkins, who has lost her beloved sister and her sister’s husband. For instance, Bishop-Jenkins writes in her article “Remember the Victims of Juvenile Offenders”, “Our society is appropriately concerned, as this forum demonstrates, with helping juveniles. Let’s also remember that the victims of violent juvenile crime need just as much of our support.” (Bishop- Jenkins) Although many might think it is cruel to sentence life in prison to adolescents, their action has ended one's life.
Leading up to this project I have been made aware of the details of how unfair and immoral the United States prison system is. In Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy, he explores the ways that criminal cases are handled, how not every police encounter is fair and legal, and the mistreatment of women and disabled inmates at below standard prisons. Subjects are plentiful because Stevenson does not limit himself to one injustice, instead he works to help as many innocent people as possible. For my research project, I have chosen the subject of wrongful sentencing of juvenile offenders as my topic, because I find that it is a complicated problem that may develop into misguided youths being completely targeted by the law. Before reading Just
As he faced justice through the court system, advocates unnecessarily argued that he was only a child and too young to serve as an adult. To show that an individual’s age should not be used as an excuse to justify their actions, Weir states “Some juveniles commit crimes so serious, so heinous, that public safety mandates — and justice demands — full accountability in our criminal justice system. There are those who argue this is unfair and unjust. They say the juvenile brain is not fully developed until well into the
There persists a heated and controversial debate nationwide as to whether, under any circumstances, a juvenile should be tried as an adult and sentenced to life in prison without parole. While recent efforts to ease the punishment have reduced the ultimate sentence for juveniles to forty years in some areas, the problem remains unaddressed at its root. Juveniles should not be sentenced as adults to life without parole because they lack in cognitive development, have rehabilitative capacity, and cost more annually to be held in prison than to be put through programs that address the root of the problem. First and most importantly, Juveniles should not be tried and sentenced as adults for life because the adolescent brain is in a period of cognitive
In a rehabilitation space for tailored treatments per child to help them make decisions that would not throw their lives away. This shows an attorney who experienced a similar juvenile case strongly believes that kids can be taught to be a better person due to their age. The attorney does not want the young offender to throw their lives away over one choice they made. Working with them to find the cause of choosing to do the crime and deal with it to prevent any further crime than being sentenced as an adult . Child offenders are kids who act according to what is happening to them and can be taught to deal with it in the right manner.
Many criminals face many different leading factors that push them to murder someone, yet still receive a form of punishment. Juveniles however, may face these same circumstances yet not share the same treatment. If juveniles have special treatment due to their age, it does not seem fair nor serve equal justice, allowing juveniles to believe they'll have more leniency in the court of law and their sentences. However, despite having knowledge of the severity of their crimes and special treatment given due to age
Every year in the United States, an estimated 250,000 children under the age of 18 are tried and imprisoned as adults. In fact, about 100,000 of these children end up in adult jails and prisons. Fourteen states in the U.S don’t even have a minimum age for trying children as adults. This topic has caused great debate all across the nation. While many people are in favor of trying children as adults, others are not very fond of the idea and strongly disagree.
Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.
When it comes to addressing whether juveniles should be tried as adults based on the seriousness of the crimes they committed, society has been in a state of utter chaos for generations. Juveniles should not be tried in adult court since doing so won't offer a long-term solution for their crimes and will only keep them caught up in a system they can't escape. Not that the severity of their crimes should be ignored, but many environmental circumstances, many of which are beyond the control of the average adolescent contribute to the progression of their crimes. Juveniles' minds can be seriously impacted by traumatic experiences, a less-than-ideal upbringing, and harsh punishments, which implies that we should offer them a source of rehabilitation
After reading “Surely Doomed,” in Bryan Stevenson’s memoir, Just Mercy, the question I want to explore is: “Why are so many children in adult jails in the first place?” According to the Equal Justice Initiative, founded by Bryan Stevenson, the government protects youth under the age of 14 because of their brains are not fully developed. In fact, most accused kids have signs of mental illness and come from traumatic and abusive backgrounds. However, if a child commits or is accused of commiting a given crime, the law’s protection defects, thus authorizing children younger than 14 to have a trial in an adult court and possibly subsequently sentenced to an adult jail or prison. Because of this, children as young as 8 years old have been tried as adults in US
When found guilty of a crime, should juveniles be charged as adults? Minors are often charged as adults for serious offenses such as murder, and robbery, but this practice has come under scrutiny in recent years. Some experts argue that minors should not be charged as adults because their brains are not fully developed, and they lack the emotional maturity to understand the consequences of their actions. Furthermore, minors who are charged as adults often face harsher sentences than their adult counterparts, which can have a lasting impact on their lives. In this essay, I will discuss why minors should not be charged as adults when guilty of a crime, with quotes from real-world sources.
The question of how to treat adolescents in the criminal justice system has always been an issue of examination and reexamination by the United States Supreme Court. Throughout the years, the Court has consistently held that adolescents are entitled to the same due process rights the adults receive. The Court has also persistently held that from a developmental standpoint, youth are different from adults, which impacts how they should be treated by the courts in various areas. Those areas include the waiver of their rights, their culpability and their punishments. One case in particular that describes the U.S. Supreme Court’s major decree in the area of juvenile justice is the landmark court case
There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.
If we look at the different criminal justice systems around the world, most countries have laws or regulations stating the “age of criminal responsibility” (Maher. G). However, there has been no clear international standard identified regarding the age at which criminal responsibility could be reasonably charged for a juvenile offender. The Convention on the Rights of Children (CRC) appeals parties to establish ‘a minimum age below which children shall be