Through the novel Anthem, Ayn Rand portrays a dystopian world similar to that of George Orwell’s 1984 or Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. There is an aspect that is prevalent in each of the books and it is the brainwashing of the general population and a government’s absolute power. Each realm uses its own unique way of controlling their citizens, and all of the people either live in fear or ignorance and apathy of the government’s unbridled control. The society in Anthem show no opposition to their captors because of the laws set by the leaders and the dreaded consequences followed by those who stand against it. To start off, the chapter begins with Equality 7-2521 writing and knowing that “It is a sin to think words no others think” (17). …show more content…
There are two instances in which Equality 7-2521 experiences these punishments, both as a bystander and as a victim. The first time, he watches the Transgressor be burned alive at the pyre. This act is to set an example and show what happens to a person who commits the “crime of speaking the Unspeakable Word” (49). Other than just being burnt alive, “they had torn out the tongue of the Transgressor, so that [he] could speak no longer” (50). This tactic definitely worked on the general population because there is no incident about any other Transgressors. In contrast, making the Transgressor a martyr only sparked another flame in Equality 7-2521 as a young boy. The Transgressor had stared at Equality 7-2521 “trying to tell us something through the flames” (51). This newly found spark leads Equality 7-2521 to follow a similar path of the Transgressor. This also leads us to the punishments Equality receives. After being late to the Home of the Street Sweepers, he does not give his explanation of tardiness. Equality 7-2521 does this to keep secret of his newfound light, but he is led to the Palace of Corrective Detention. There, he receives a brutal whipping comparable to punishments in the time of the Roman Empire. When he was whipped, “the pain struck [him] in [his] throat and fire ran in [his] lungs without air” (64). Just like the Transgressor, he is unmoved …show more content…
This could only have been achieved through the strict laws set forth by the Council and the unhesitant consequences that are followed by defiance of the law. As with all dystopian future based novels, it is a prediction of the some worst case scenarios that our world can fall into. As with George Orwell’s 1984 and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, both feared severe censorship in the future. In the case of Ayn Rand’s Anthem, it is the fear of collectivism and no sense of individuality. All three author’s prediction of the future are somewhat true in each and every way, but not to the extremes of the books’ depictions. Nonetheless, it is important to be wary of the possible threats that could create a dystopian society, and to continue to express the freedoms that are currently in
Writers use dystopian literature to get the reader to avoid terrible events that could occur in the future. In Ayn Rand’s novel, Anthem, and in Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, both novels share rebellious protagonists in order to show the corruption of society by control and education. Montag and Equality both rebel by taking items they should not have and then they both escape society. Their methods of rebelling were the beginning of a new age for their society.
In the real world that we live in, curiosity and changing for the better is a natural and good cause for citizens. In the dystopian novels of “Fahrenheit 451” and “Anthem” curiosity and change is some of the greatest of transgressions in the books society and only some are willing to do. Through the dystopian characteristics of Independent thought and freedoms restricted and citizens conform to uniform expectations, both Fahrenheit 451 and anthem present the similar theme that in a dystopian society, curiosity and change leads to the freedom that one hopes for. The authors of Fahrenheit 451 and Anthem use many dystopian characteristics to convey the theme that curiosity and change leads to the freedoms one might hope for, but one of the
Unlike during the Unmentionable Times, when men created “towers [that] rose to the sky,” it is an affliction to be born with powerful intellectual capacity and ambition in Ayn Rand’s apocalyptic, nameless society in Anthem. Collectivism is ostensibly the moral guidepost for humanity, and any perceived threat to the inflexible, authoritarian regime is met with severe punishment. The attack on mankind’s free will and reason is most evident in the cold marble engraving in the Palace of the World Council: “We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, One, indivisible and forever” (6). Societal norms force homogeneity and sacrifice among all people.
How Does One Lead a Rational Life in the Great Rebirth Ayn Rand is an illustrious writer, known for many of her works including the short novella Anthem and her short essay How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society. In Anthem, she speaks of a dystopian world set in the future with primitive technology. The Council expects everybody to look, act, and generally be the same as one another; however, Equality, the main character of Anthem, does not conform to the social norm. He rebels from the cookie-cutter system and learns to see the deep err in the way of the Council and finally realises the effects that the abusive treatment of the citizens creates.
Anthem by Ayn Rand is the story of how a man broke free from a society where singularity and being different was evil. Anthem deals with the topic of communism and how everyone is supposed to be equal and the same. This is shown in the book where in Equality 7-2521’s society, the use of the word “I” is non existent. Instead they use the word “We”. This is because that in this world, no man is alone and does everything alongside his brothers.
Anthem Ayn Rand’s strong opinion of individualism is exaggerated in a most extreme way in her world famous novel Anthem. Her book focuses on “we” rather than “I,” and about the community rather than the individuals. She magnifies communism to every possible extremity.
The Virtue of Mortality Ayn Rand’s story of Anthem takes place in an oppressive, Communist-like society of the future, where there is no individual - only the great “WE.” Subjects of this dreary civilization have no rights - existing solely to serve the state for a lifetime in their assigned position. The protagonist of the story, Equality 7-2521, is a gifted young man who is different from his fellow brothers. Equality desires to be a scientist, but instead, the government commands him to be a Street Sweeper out of fear of his mind and curiosity.
Comparisons and Contrasts of Fahrenheit 451 and Anthem The novel Fahrenheit 451 is written with aspects of a society similar to that of Anthem in relation to their futuristic governments and dynamic characters. Montag in Fahrenheit 451 is faced with multiple challenges comparable to those of Prometheus in Anthem. Although each character plays a different role, they are both striving to achieve freedoms and happiness. The wellbeing of themselves and others is predominately the main concern for both Montag and Prometheus.
The critical flaw in the collective state that Equality capitalizes on to escape lies within its very foundation. Anthem best exemplifies this flaw through Equality’s escape from the Palace of Corrective Detention, as he describes “It was easy to escape the Palace of Corrective Detention. The locks are old on the doors and there are no guards about. There is no reason to have guards, for men have never defied the Councils so far as to escape from whatever place they were ordered to be” (66-67). The Council believes the fallacies it espouses, making it easy for Equality to escape.
In the books Fahrenheit 451 and Anthem, by Ray Bradbury and Ayn Rand, the societies displayed are very different from modern day societies. In Anthem the main character, Equality 7-2521, is a young man who lives in a society where there is absolutely no individuality personality wise and it is basically considered a sin to be different than others. In Fahrenheit 451 the main character, Guy Montag, lives in a society where no one thinks independently, it is illegal to read, and no one really cares about anything. Both societies restrict free thinking, but both do it in ways different than the other. In both books the main characters meet someone who changes their lives for the better.
The City in Ayn Rand’s dystopian novella Anthem imposes many strict regulations in regard to what its citizens are permitted to do. In the City, none may stand against the crowd or show any differences. Rules to keep everyone in place and to keep the system running regulate the citizens from birth until death and every interaction that will fall between. They can’t express themselves in any way that separates them or shows a uniqueness. They are one and must always remain as such, but when an individual diverges and shows individuality, chaos ensues and the rules are broken leaving room for a new and different society to emerge.
A Dystopian society between the real word and the book “Anthem” have a unique set of differences and similarities. In North Korea it’s structure is known as SongBun, a society as to which their ruler is the person they must worship and make all living sacrifices to please their “God”, however in the book “Anthem”, by Ayn Rand, they must live in a society where they must love all brothers as one and only one whole. In one law that’s unique in their own that they share is that they must obey or be given death as punishment. Nor shall they question what they are given as their career. The people in the society between them are different, yet the amount of love they believe is the “right belief” is equal.
Collectivism and Selfishness in Anthem Imagine living in a world where everybody's lives are completely mapped out by the government. Where every decision is made without the input of the citizens it affects. In the novella Anthem, Ayn Rand depicts a completely collectivist society, where every idea, action, and invention is purely for the benefit of society as a whole. Everything is done with the entire population in mind, and individuality is extremely frowned upon.
And we know well that there is no transgression blacker than to do or think alone” (Rand 17). In Equality 7-2521’s society the freedom to think or do anything for yourself is restricted. Everything an individual does or thinks must be done for his society as a whole. By writing in diary form, Equality is breaking the law because his doing for himself and not his
Victory Over Collectivism “I”, one of the only one-letter words in the English language. Yet its power and meaning do not match its quantitative value. In the collectivist dictatorship found the in the novel Anthem by Ayn Rand, this word has disappeared and consequently, society has fallen into a dark age, all because of the loss of a single-lettered word. However, the hero of this time, Equality 7-2521, breaks down the barrier of the collectivist society and allows him to make advances that show him the power of the word “I” and the idea of individualism in government and in society. Although the word “I” has vanished from society, Equality is able to free himself from the collectivist government through the use of science and free thought,