The idea of communism arose from The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto was a political pamphlet that gave an approach to class struggle and capitalism. The pamphlet soon after became popular across the world. Over a 100 years later, an African-American civil rights leader by the name of Martin Luther King Jr. would read this pamphlet and use similar idea's to achieve his dream of integration and equality. King, a minister, was known for using somewhat communist views in reference to Marx in many of his speeches and letters. One of the most prominent being the Letter from a Birmingham Jail. The works and beliefs of Karl Marx and King tend to overlap in terms of the oppressed, the law, and alienation. …show more content…
Both Marx and King agree that the oppressed will always try to gain control of the oppressed and the oppressed will eventually riot and fight back. Marx wrote that eventually tension will rise between the "powerful and the powerless." Meanwhile in King's Letter from a Birmingham Jail, he states that "freedom is never given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed." Both statements agree that freedom will never be voluntarily given to the oppressor it must be taken.
Marx wrote that laws were created to fulfill the wishes of the oppressor. The government uses police force to enforce these laws and make sure that they are upheld. Marx uses the term "disintegration" to define that the law is made up of a few oppressors and an abundance of the oppressed. He states that in a powerful state, laws are enforced to destroy any threats of diversion. King had a similar view on the way the law worked. In his letter he opens his views on the law by speaking out on the police force. He writes the following lines:
"When you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at
Injustices in Birmingham While sitting in the Birmingham jail in 1963, Martin Luther King Jr., writes a powerful and emotional letter to the clergymen of Birmingham. In his letter, he responds to the harsh criticism and injustices he received for simply protesting peacefully without a permit. King states in his letter, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Thoreau and M.L.K Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”, published in 1849, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, published in 1963, have profound similarities while still having underlying differences. The one of the most distinct similarities in “Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” is the choice of action both authors decide to use, nonviolent measures, and who they are protesting against, which is government and its actions. On the same note, both essays express the dissatisfaction in the average white citizen’s acceptance for the status quo on slavery and then segregation. For example, both essays have a strikingly similar sentence; King states, “I had hoped that the white moderate
"Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau and "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Lither King Jr. Both had the same idea but they were shared in different ways. "Civil Disobedience" was written in the 1830's where as "The Letter From Birmingham Jail" was written nearly 100 years letter. Both pieces of writing showed civil disobedience, and they were shared in the same way, but they both had different views. In both pieces of work the authors have different views of the injustice in the government. Both men, Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, targeted larger groups rather than smaller ones.
Alex Newman Ms Gould American Literature January 11, 2018 Letter from Birmingham Jail King uses a variety of religious and historical allusions in “ Letter from Birmingham Jail.” On the day of April 16, 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested in downtown Birmingham on a good Friday, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. wrote his famous letter “A Letter From Birmingham Jail” due to the criticism demonstrated by prominent white clergyman.
The Inspiration of Martin Luther King Jr. in His Letter from Birmingham Jail On April 3, 1963, black men and women, impatient for equality, opened a campaign to desegregate businesses in downtown Birmingham. The protesters who defied these segregation laws soon filled Bull Connor’s jail cell beyond capacity. When the state courts of Alabama issued an injunction against the protests, Dr. King decided to defy the law and suffer the consequences.
Throughout reading King’s letter “From Birmingham City Jail” there are many strong points made that could easily compel the reader to understand his point of view. Each paragraph was intricately written to have a deeper meaning. One paragraph that stood out to be the strongest was paragraph twelve. This paragraph had strong points that put the reader in a poignant standing with in the situations that were brought upon, one could easily feel the inequality expressed. If we look at the previous paragraph building up to this one, King starts off by saying “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed” (King 5).
King comes to the conclusion that, when laws are unjust it is the duty of all citizens to stand up against them, cause tension, and try to evoke
In 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was leading the march of the Civil Rights revolution in Birmingham, Alabama, when he was arrested for violating an unjust law. During King’s time in jail, he came across a news article that disparaged the march and degraded its purpose. Thus, evoking a letter response from King, most commonly known today as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. Martin Luther King Jr. begins the letter by addressing his fellow clergymen, and pointing out that he normally does not respond to criticism. He then starts to explain how segregation has had a negative toll on the black community.
Throughout the American 1960’s there was a Civil Rights Movement. This movement gained a lot of traction within a short amount of time through many people. There were two leaders with opposing tactics but had the same goal reined in the movement. One leader was Martin Luther King with the tactic of Nonviolent Civil Disobedience and integration. The second leader was Malcolm X with the tactic to fight back and to have the communities better themselves by being separate.
The 1960’s was an era of time that can be defined by change and milestones. From the Civil Rights protests to the assassination of a beloved leader, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, many lives were greatly affected. In America, the 1960’s ended on a good note when the United States won the Space Race. However, in the beginning of the 1960’s, people were being stoned for trying to fight for their basic rights.
King writes to the eight clergymen who were critical of his protests and to the indifferent people of the United States. In the essay, he claims that he has done nothing wrong by protesting peacefully. In paragraph 11, King says “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” He is saying that freedom is something they have to fight for because the authorities will not give it to them. He is directing this statement at the clergymen while reaching the apathetic people of the United States.
King first shows his views here. “Nonviolent direct action creates such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue” (10). This shows how King pursued nonviolent over violent protest, which shows that he values doing everything without harming anyone. King also explains his views in this quote. “”One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws.
In 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. was sent to jail because of a peaceful protest, protesting treatments of blacks in Birmingham. Before the protest a court ordered that protests couldn’t be held in Birmingham. While being held in Birmingham, King wrote what came to be known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Not even King himself could predict how much of an impact this letter would have on the Civil Rights Movement. In the letter kind defended Kings beliefs on Nonviolent Protests, King also counters the accusations of him breaking laws by categorizing segregation laws into just and unjust laws. King uses this principle to help persuade others to join him in his acts of civil disobedience.
As society faced great inequities in the 19th and 20th centuries, activists and philosophers sought to inform the general public. At the turn of the 19th century, Thoreau presented his writing of a "Civil Disobedience" as an argument of the injustices of the tyrannical government after spending a night in jail. Likewise, Martin Luther King Jr. presented his argument to society as he was jailed in 1963. In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," King perceives the injustice of the African American community as a primary goal as to the need for the advocation of the whole population. Whereas in Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience," it addresses the injustices in broader terms and stresses the despotic government.
In the Crito by Plato, Socrates argues against civil disobedience, seeing it as an unjust act. Contrasting this view, Martin Luther King argues for civil disobedience against unjust laws, and seeing it as a responsibility of citizens. Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain law, commands or requests of the government. I will argue that the view of Socrates is superior to the view of Martin Luther King on the justness of civil disobedience. Using the argument against harm, I will show that even if a law is viewed as unjust, you must not repay an evil with another evil, as evident in the Crito while contrary to ideas presented by MLK.