When Simon was killed in Lord of the Flies by William Golding, his role, a righteous and pure boy untainted by barbarity, perished along with his body. He embodied the innocence and naivety of the modern civilization and symbolized the children before they mutated into savages, influenced by the lack of regulation and jurisdiction. In spite of this, one can argue that his passing was not a primary shifting mark in the novel due to the power dynamic between all the boys remaining the same, considering that Piggy continued to be neglected as Jack went on to attaining authority on the island. While it may seem like nothing changed, Simon’s murder allowed Jack to display his superiority and bring out the violent and uncontrollable nature within all the boys. As a result, since Jack’s philosophy of savageness and cruelty was fueled by Simon’s death, the event was a major turning point in the novel. Simon’s abrupt end contributed to the worst in all of the boys, even the littluns. In Chapter Nine of Lord of the Flies, after Simon’s brutal murder, “Somewhere over the darkened curve of the …show more content…
Jack’s beliefs of malice were proven, demonstrating that everyone had a dark side, whether they chose to acknowledge it or not. Jack also earned enough authority to acquire dominance of the island through Simon’s passing, due to the fact that his capabilities of violence were displayed, whereas before the boys might have been doubtful of his dubious boasting. Simon’s death also caused Piggy to obtain more self-confidence, using his emotion and attachment to Simon as a powerful anchor, in with he realized that the savage game the island and Jack were playing had gone to excessive lengths. Simon’s death made it so that Jack could dominate the island and further spread his ideas of disorder and brutality, dooming the boys to bloodshed and their own ultimate
Our thoughts and reactions to Simon Abbott are: his main purpose on the island was to show and emphasize the savagery that took place between the group of boys. Golding used his fainting problem as a way for him to communicate with the beast and reveal the total evil that the island is succumb to. The author also used Simon’s brutal murder as a way to further emphasize the savagery of the boys and display a loss of innocents for Piggy and Ralph. Simon Abbott’s body has not yet been found from the Island case. Based on the statements from the other victims Simon is not guilty of any crimes that may have taken part on the island.
Lord of the Flies ends with absolute chaos following Piggy and Simon’s deaths, Jack and every boy on the island go on a hunt to capture and kill Ralph. Piggy and Simon were both boys on the island who were outcasts. Ralph failed as a leader and Jack decided to form his own group. Each boy slowly filtered into his tribe. Jack and Ralph were the original two options for chief.
The boys killed a mama pig horrifically and offered it to the Lord of the Flies. Then Simon died by being stabbed and beaten to death. At the end the boys hunted Ralph and were planning to kill him, until the officer came to the rescue. The schoolboys have lost their innocence and nothing will ever be the
He is attacked and killed by the others at Jack’s command. Simon’s death is not only an important turning point but also a symbol for the complete loss of innocence: “...for it is the first time that the boys have deliberately killed one of their own” (Lord of the Flies Novels for Students). The main reason for Simon’s death, besides Jack’s instruction, is the boys’ common belief of “the beast”. Even though Simon had once pointed out “the beast” might only be their imaginations by saying, “...maybe it’s only us” (Golding 89), Jack convinces them otherwise. He tells them “the beast” must to be killed.
As the boys on the island go from well-behaved, children waiting for someone to rescue them to, bloodthirsty hunters who have no desire to return to civilization, they lose the sense of innocence that they had at the beginning of the book. The boys who took Jack’s side and became savages, become evil towards the end of the book. The Lord of the Flies opens your eyes to see the capabilities of evil in all things. All of the boys on the island are tempted by evil, but Ralph, Piggy, Simon and SamnEric don't give in.
When Simon first encounters the Lord of the Flies, he realizes that it is a manifestation of the boys' fear and savagery. He thinks to himself, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill! You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?" (Chapter 8).
William Golding’s fictional, British novel, Lord of the Flies, presents a character that serves a two-part function as a “scapegoat” and a certain commentary on life. During WWII, a group of British boys are being evacuated via plane when they crash and are stranded on an island without adults. As time progresses, the innate evilness of human nature begins to overcome the savage society of young boys while Piggy, an individual representation of brains without brawn, becomes an outlier as he tries to resist this gradual descent of civilness and ends up shouldering the blame for the wrongdoings of the savage tribe. Up until his untimely death, Piggy is portrayed as the most intellectual and most civil character in the group of stranded boys. Right from the beginning, Piggy realized that “[they] got to do something,” (8) and he recognized the shell Ralph had picked up as a conch.
Evil and savagery lives within and it can be brought out when you are forced to fight for something. We all have a dark side that may not show until faced with a challenging task. Lord of the Flies is about a group of young boys stuck on an island after their plane crashes. There are no adults and they are left to survive by themselves. They have to decide between right and wrong.
In the words of David Gemmell, “there is evil is all of us, and it is the mark of a man how he defies the evil within.” The beast in the novel starts as a symbol of fear and something that was ignored but ends up creating chaos and representing evil. In William Golding 's, Lord of the Flies, the boys making fun of the little boy for being scared of the beastie and the boys doubting Sam and Eric, Simons hallucination, and Simon 's death are evidence that show the evil and ignorance in the boys. There are many signs of ignorance towards the beast in the novel. One example of ignorance towards the beast is when the boys made fun of the little boy for being scared of the beast.
Civilization means to be a part of a culture, to have a leader who takes power, and to be apart of orderly society. In the novel The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Simon is the most civilized boy on the island because he has the most positive outlook out of every boy on the island, he is insightful of what and where the beast is, and, he is the first to realize most of the problems that occur on the island. Simon has the most positive outlook out of every boy on the island. Simon insisted multiple times that the boys would get rescued, even when Ralph strongly doubted the possibility.
“At once the crowd surged after it … no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (Golding 153). Simon was the main symbol of pure innocence on the island and the boys have destroyed that, taking away any morality that they had. Golding's use of symbolism here shows that the final drop into chaos for all the boys on the island is coming and will happen faster now that they have lost all innocence. Through Jack's disregard for the rules,
People rarely in their childhood are forced to make decisions or to worry about things you can't control. Individuals never realize what they had until it’s gone. Lord of the Flies is about the crash landing of a plane containing a group of British children and a power struggle arises. In chapter 9 Simon is killed in a frenzy whilst trying to inform the boys about the beast. Chapter 9 is the epitome of what Lord of the Flies embodies.
In Jake Wallis article, “Why Lord of the Flies speaks volumes about boys”(2014), argues that Lord of the Flies is not about human nature, it’s only about how boys act. He supports his claim by saying “it could be more accurately be said to be about the male human condition. ”Simons’s purpose is to tell the readers that the Lord of the Flies doesn’t talk about all human nature, it only talks about boys human nature. He creates a direct tone for everyone who reads the book.
Jack has changed greatly, over the course of William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies. Crashing onto an island without adults and having to survive put a strain on all of the boys, but Jack’s personality altered the most due to this experience. He went from living as an ambitious choir boy, to being a vicious, brutal, beast. Many things changed Jack on the island, but most of all, he created the monster he became.
During Simon’s encounter with the Lord of the Flies, Golding reveals the central issue concerning human nature. Simon reaches the realization that they fear the beast because it exists within each of them. The Lord of the Flies tells Simon that the beast is inside each boy and cannot be killed. The boys go from behaving like civilized young men to brutal savages. “What I mean is…maybe it’s only us.”