The rapid expansion of technological growth is immersing our culture. The Nathan Jurgenson’s “The IRL Fetish”, argues that people have weird obsessions about the offline. Technological advances allow people to experience the online, but Jurgenson realizes that people are also fetishizing the movement against the online. People and novelists who complain the online world laments, “Writer after writer laments the loss of a sense of disconnection, of boredom (now redeemed as a respite from anxious info-cravings) …” (Jurgenson 127). People believe technological advances are changing the public’s mind that they must avoid and restrain from using the technologies because they are destroying our experience with real life. This new movement is educating …show more content…
I believe people who are practicing self-control to stay “offline” to gain self-esteem are ridiculous. Like the author, I am disgusted by this obsession, and I know that offline cannot be achieved as long as we are alive. However, this real-life experience only exists because the people invent the idea offline for their pleasure. Jurgenson explains perfectly, “There was and is no offline; offline is a lusted-after fetish object that some claim the special ability to reach, and it has always been a phantom” (129). The offline is an ideal place created by people who only love social media, but feels guilty when they realize they are addicted to them. I believe people feel better about themselves when they practice restraining themselves from using their technological devices. This idealism also leads many people who fetishize the offline to become prideful, and they start thinking they are better than other people. In reality, they are the ones who are really addicted to the cyberspace, and their boastfulness tries to hide their real obsession. People will dwell in the cyberspace if they have any contact with it. People believe that the offline exists because they are obsessed and create an ideal place, but Jurgenson clearly explains that “offline” is like a Utopia which cannot be …show more content…
The author knows that people will continue to fetishize over the offline. But, he is confident because the author is raising awareness to us who are fetishizing the offline. I think obsessing about the cyber world is a waste of time. Therefore, these people are searching for an ideal dream. Jurgenson believes the solution for this fetishism is to understand what "online" is. Additionally, we must understand "the real-life experience" which is a fabricated world created by people's fear of the addiction to the technologies. There is no solution to “log off” permanently. But, I think there is a way to log off permanently. I believe. If we die, the online and the offline will not exist. What would be life be like without the online and the offline world? I think life after death is joyful without the distractions of technological advances. Therefore, while we are alive in this world with advanced technologies, we should live in the offline and the online with balanced mindsets to focus on what is
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Always On In this chapter Sherry Turkle discusses how new technologies have shaped the manner in which we interact with other individuals. Relationships have changed. In this new technological era, where one can remain online all time through various devices, Turkle wonders if being “on” effects the way we perceive others. Since our time is spent looking at screens, we are absent from what is happening in the real world. Instead of being aware of our surroundings, many are consumed by the many different possibilities that the Net provides.
The main idea of this essay that is presented by Nicholas Carr is that humanity may progressively become simple minded. Carr states how the internet has damaging consequences on the human mind and how his own remembrance is being affected by ‘internet jumping’ from one site to another. In this essay, Carr believes that our unnecessary use of the internet is not letting people to reflect and read like they used to before the impact and convenience of technology. The author also talks about our reading and writing ability and how issues are rising due to the dependence of technology. Carr gives
Reading Disorders: Online Suicide and the Death of Hope by Debra Ferreday examines suicide in media. She starts her literary work by giving insight to the Abraham Biggs and “Bridgend suicide cult” cases. She then discusses the fears surrounding online suicide that could lead to “the death of hope” in media. Next, she criticizes Abigail Bray’s article that describes “reading disorders” and how online relationships connect with social media.
Nicholas Carr, What the Internet is doing to Our Brains The Shallows (2010) asserts that, “The price we pay to assume technology’s power is alienation.” He supports this assertion by saying, “They both ultimately achieve their mental and behavioral effects by shaping the synaptic organization of the brain.” Also by, “ We long to keep it activated.” The writer concludes in order for people to improve their thoughts, they will have to cope with the new technology and how they think. Carr believes that technology is taking over how people interact with each other.
Postman’s Writing Skills on Technology over American Society Three decades ago, an author foretold of a country that was slowly rotting away in front of televisions. Neil Postman wrote Amusing Ourselves to Death in order to bring forth public attention that technology, especially television, has become the focal point of information in today’s society. With so much influence over citizens of the United States, Postman sadly informed his audience that people are becoming overwhelmed with technology. With his analysis on what was happening in that period of time, Postman wrote the final chapter from his book, in order to reprimand others about how television is preoccupying them from other activities.
“What would we do without the internet?” a phrase coined by a generation that has become accustomed to this new technology. If you look back not even twenty years ago, most people were still just learning about what the internet was, while today everybody has a facebook, twitter, or an email account. This massive shift that came about from such a brilliant invention happened quickly, and Malcolm Gladwell and Nicholas Carr look into how the internet has changed us as people and as a civilization in just a couple of decades. Just how did we as a society become so dependent on a technology that has, for the most part, become the center of our daily lives, and what are the potential drawbacks of that dependency?
Nicholas Carr wrote this essay to let the upcoming generations know about the danger effect of the Internet overuse by using ethos, logos, and pathos and also some other rhetorical strategies. He starts his essay with a scene that was takin by Stanley Kubrick’s A in 2001: A Space Odyssey at the end of the paragraph saying, “I can feel it.’’ And after that he started his next paragraph with the same words, “I can feel it.’’
Slowly Disconnecting With every technology related innovation, we get lost; and so does our connection with reality. As a result of this disconnection, our behavior changes. The people closest to us are in our lives, but no longer part of it. Families no longer interact during dinner, or take part in family activities.
A Mind of its Own Nicholas Carr’s “The Shallows” is his more elaborate version of his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Both displaying his claim of how profoundly the human brain can be influenced, not only by the Internet, but technology as a whole. “The Web provides a convenient and compelling supplement to personal memory - but when we start using the Web as a substitute for personal memory, by bypassing the inner processes of consolidation, we risk emptying our minds of their riches.” (192) A variety of rhetorical choices and appeals are skills Carr uses to build an informative, mind-opening glance at the Internets affect on the mind.
Technology is constantly evolving, and changing how we live our day to day life. The PEW Research Center found that 68% of adults have a smartphone, while 86% of people between the ages of 18 and 29 do. Technology evolves so fast that people don’t even realize that the smartphones most people have did not exist twenty years ago. Sometimes technology changes so fast people don’t realize the harm that can come from it. Every time technology advances the need for offline face to face interactions decrees.
Teens and adults alike in the 21st century are far more invested in technology and modern advances than in the rest of society. Physical activity and recreation are but a forethought. One would rather send an emoji or a snapchat than speak face to face or even make a simple phone call. Modern technology, while upgrading our social lives, is downgrading our social skills, manners, and interactions with the real world. When such societal atrocities occur, the people fight back with art.
This is logical because since we do not do the small things as often, it would make sense for people to appreciate them a bit more than they did in the past. Jurgenson appeals to logic to persuade his readers that people who claimed to be logged off of social media aren’t truly offline. Jurgenson notes,’’There was and is no offline; it is a lusted-after fetish object that some claim special ability to attain, and it has always been a phantom. ’’ This quotes proves the writer's point because society is always looking for praise from their colleagues and friends for supposedly logging off but there is no reason for this praise to be dispersed.
We depend too much on technology. There is no doubt about it. Many places of work are at a loss if their internet connection stops working. Many businesses and institutions are left high and dry if the internet or computer crashes. Every bit of information regarding business is entered into the computer.