In Richard Kearney’s article “Terror, Philosophy and The Sublime”, he begins with the statement “how can we understand the ‘terror’ of September 11th?” (23), Kearney begins to summarize the event of September 11th and the decision the United States made after the attack. In his second paragraph he relates his own experience from visiting a exhibition about “Terrors and Wonders” showing the representation of different monsters and how we see them today. Kearney uses his personal experience by trying to understand the “terror” of September 11th along with extensive research to show his credibility. The rhetorical appeals of logos, pathos and ethos creates an argument showing readers how we as americans are able to get through a monstrous situation. …show more content…
In his first few paragraph he gives us a summary of what happened during September 11th and how America reacted to this monstrous act “ The initial response of President Bush was to divide the world into good and evil” (24). He shows a reliable source being President Bush, and explains why the United States went to war. In his argument of wanting to explain and help Americans understand the terror of September 11th, he provides strong and reliable evidence on why the choices that were made, were for the best of the American people. Richard Kearney again chooses to quote President Bush after he gave a speech to the American people in November of 2002 saying “ We wage a war to save Civilization itself..We have our marching orders. Fellow Americans, Let's Roll. Kearney than goes on to explain that “Lets Roll” was the quote said by the passenger who went face to face with the terrorists before the fourth plane crashed. Having this immense reason and logic gives the readers a reason to believe the argument and want to keep reading. There is no question on, if Kearney knows what he is talking about or making an invalid …show more content…
In “Terror, Philosophy and The Sublime”, we as readers, have the emotion of fear. Kearney’s tone and writing style made us relive September 11th. In the summary of what happened on the day of September 11th he used many different idioms to show the extent of fear american had, “ Idioms of virus, poison, disease and contamination were variously deployed to express the sense of an omnipresent menace – especially when the terror from the air was accompanied by terror in the air: the fear of anthrax, smallpox and other agents of bio- chemical destruction (24). After he showcases the fear americans had and along with rest of the world, he reminds us of how we came together as a country making us forget about the fear and seeing the good “was a phenomenal upsurge of patriotic fervour evidenced in the proliferation of star-spangled banners and typified in the 24 September cover headline of Time magazine – ‘ONE NATION,
The Ashen Guy “I was almost out,” sends chills throughout the statue figured people of New York (Beller 61). Thomas Beller, an author of a collection of short stories, manifests the horrific surroundings happening at the World Trade Center on that brisk morning of September 11, 2001. New York residents are not only frantic and solicitous; they stand trembling from terror. Beller exhibits the irregular atmosphere around him: “Cop cars parked at odd angles, their red sirens spinning” (Beller 60). Demonstrating the denial, barren faces of the people witnessing a World Trade Center tower descending to the ground.
In his “9/11 Address to the Nation” the 43rd President of the United States of America, George W. Bush assures that America will not be affected by the unruly and evil attacks carried out on September 11th, 2001. The President drafted this speech to resist the impending fear and questioning that American citizens around the country would soon be consumed by. Because 9/11 was the most impactful, yet devastating terrorist attack on the United States to date, Bush was not able to derive his thoughts from others’ ideas and speeches, thus he was forced to dig deep and extract the emotions and thoughts aroused by the “despicable acts.” Much like any great leader, President Bush wanted to stress the importance of instilling a sense of pride and resilience in the country and fellow countrymen and women to come together and remain as one. As the head of the “brightest beacon of freedom and opportunity” President George W. Bush declares that the United States of America will “remain strong” and appear unaffected as the country continues to build and rebound from the senseless acts of terrorism and hate.
For this assignment, I found a story related to the two 9/11 works which were assigned in this week’s learning journal. This piece, entitled “Are we winning the battle against terrorism?” is a relatively recent debate between Thomas Mockaitis, professor of History at DePaul University, and Jon Alterman, Center for Stategic and International Studies. They are asked if we are making progress in the fight against terrorism. The first writer, Mockaitis, seems to have a positive view that the U.S. and its allies are making headway on defeating terrorists.
Davidsson explains that the assumption that conspiracy theories are a paranoia style made media critical of presenting such theories. Hence, the media’s report obtained from the government blinded the public into believing Al-Qaeda, a radical Islamic terrorist, was responsible for the attack. Davidsson gave numerous examples to show the US government’s constant obsession with secrecy regarding what had happened on 9/11. Davidsson makes it clear to readers that the US government has not provided any legitimate evidence that shows the nineteen hijackers relationship with Al-Qaeda.
The writing “We Choose Honor” has a very moving subject that includes a variety of syntax, diction, imagery, and tone to achieve its claim. The subject itself is 9/11, the catastrophic disaster that moved the United States in a way it hadn’t in decades. With such a large topic at hand, Elie Wiesel takes the disaster and shapes it into a writing that emotionally captures millions of readers. The all-around purpose of this writing is to empower and inform the people reading; Unfortunately, such an instance will be forever engraved in the skull’s of those affected by this tragedy, and Wiesel was one of them. Nonetheless, the tragic loss of thousands of individuals on that day will be eternally remembered through history.
Cities such as New York are always being thought about, romanticized, and captured in film and television. In “The City and the Pillars”, an article from the New Yorker written post-9/11 by Adam Gopnik, New York is not glorified in the traditional way. Gopnik uses imagery, dialogue fragments, and an omnipresent point of view to help readers be spectators of the aftermath of the attack on the twin towers, and to remind his audience that the places people inhabit are not protected. From the beginning, the author opens up with an image that is repeated in the conclusion of this piece as well.
In his book entitled Untie the Fear Knots of Your Heart, published by Liberty University Books in 2010, Dr. Ken Nichols explains how fears are generated from life events, and that knowing how to manage these fears can be far healthier than letting them control the heart. Dr. Nichols explains how fear is a normal response to life-altering events that one may face, and these fears can often tie one’s heart in knots. This steals the joy that Christ provides. Attempting to use the fear will not overcome the challenging event that originated the fear. Depraved things happen, and they can cause fear.
This is the first terrorist attack that we have experienced in the 21st century. President Bush spoke out to the American people to empower and soothe them in a vulnerable time. President Bush reassures citizens and the victim’s families that America and its people are not only strong but are safe and will rise up again. Bush effectively executes his 9/11 speech and uses rhetorical devices to catch the citizens attention, calm the America people and unite them together again.
Pitts uses emotion and logic to persuade the Americans that the terrorists can do what they want to us, but America is tough enough to handle it. In life everyone comforts each other in times of grieving. Pitts explains that this one small obstacle can 't stop
On September 11, 2001 nineteen Muslim terrorists hijacked four commercial airlines, and with fire in their eyes began a mission that would not only shake New York, but all of the world. Two of the hijacked planes were flown into the twin towers, smashing into them with a ball of fire and turmoil. New Yorkers froze in shock as they watched their city become something they never imagined possible. A city coated in flaming debris, ash, and human remains. As our nation slowly repairs its emotionally scarred hearts a recently problematic proposal has America split in half.
Moore and Stone use rhetoric to persuade viewers to harmonize with the idea that humanity was forced to cope with hardships . Certain conventions are used to accurately depict specific details of 9/11 and how they affected many people. Finally the analysis of 9/11’s future impact continue to demonstrate the magnitude of this catastrophe. Ultimately the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 displays the hardship individuals must face as a result of 9/11 better than the movie World Trade Center as Michael Moore does a superior job
He was faced with the difficult task that evenings of letting the world know what took place that day, and help the American people through a day of shock and disbelief. In a time of unspeakable evil, George W bush addresses that nation using rhetorical appeals; together with the history of American ideas to reassure and untie not only Americans, but the world to stand together and fight back on the war of terrorism.
However, for many interviewed in this report, those opinions where "negative" (Driscoll 75). The bombings held great significance during this time period because it was the first time that American society was introduced to foreign terrorist operatives and their malicious acts of horror. Up until this incident, the largest terrorist attack suffered on U.S. soil was the Oklahoma City bombings carried out by homegrown terrorist Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City Bombing 20 Years Later). Now that the American public had witnessed an attack directed specifically at the U.S. government on foreign territory, attention was brought to the encroaching presence of America on the world stage, reminiscent of the USSR in Eastern Europe.
Austin King Ms. Den Otter A.P. English Language and Composition President Obama Speech Analysis On the morning of September 11th, terrorists hijacked 4 planes, 2 of which were crashed into the World Trade Center Buildings, another hit the Pentagon, and one was crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. This tragic morning in American history caused the death of almost 3000 people, and the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, was behind it. After planning a mission for around 4 years to execute Osama bin Laden, on May 2, 2011, he was killed by US special forces. President Obama follows this event with a speech, its goal being to inform the American people of the death of the man who had caused the death of so many loved ones, and achieves this by using rhetorical devices such as parallel structure and appeals to emotion. In the beginning of President Obama’s speech announcing the death of Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, he reminds the American people of the tragic events that took place on the morning of 9/11, when “nearly 3,000 citizens were taken from us.”
But Baudrillard goes on to argue that 9/11 defies not just morality, but any form of interpretation. This statement feeds back to the earlier idea that the sheer size and scale of the attacks and their enormous visual symbolism posed specific problems for writers attempting to accommodate the subject into conventional fictional narratives. Indeed, contrary to Amis; assertion of a literature that would stand in opposition to what he sees as irrational, religious violence, the realist novel has struggled profoundly to represent the