ipl-logo

The Mabo Case: Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanderss

733 Words3 Pages

On June 3 1992, the legal decision of the Mabo case was made by the High Court, the highest court in Australia’s legal system (Webb, 2008). For thousands of years before the arrival of the British in 1788, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have had their strong connection to the Australian Land. When the British arrived in 1788, it was declared that the country was terra nullius (land belonging to nobody), which resulted to the absence of recognition towards the connection between the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders and the Australian land. The declaration of terra nullius also resulted to the British taking land without agreement or payment towards the indigenous Australians (Webb, 2008). In the 1970s the Queensland Government …show more content…

Eddie Mabo argued that the people of Mer have settled in stable communities, had their own organizations such as political organizations and social organizations and have continuously inhabited and had owned these lands, aiming to win his second case (www.australiatogether.org.au). When the High Court made their legal decision on June 3 1992, the rights over Australian land changed for the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders. The court’s decision stated that terra nullius should not have been applied to Australia (www.reconciliation.org.au). Their decision also recognized that the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have rights to the land as it is acknowledged that they have a unique connection to their land (www.reconciliation.org.au). The high court also recognized the principal of the native title. This means that the high court recognized that there was title to land before the arrival of the European Settlers …show more content…

This is an act that acknowledges the rights to land for the Torres Straight Islanders and Aboriginals because of their traditional laws and customs (www.reconciliation.org.au). It accepts the notion of native title in law and also recognizes the rights of the owners of freehold property. However, the rights to this law are not limitless; it all depends on the traditional laws and customs of the people claiming the title (www.reconciliation.org.au). The interests in, or right to the land from other people are also relevant. This also rules over the Native Title (www.reconciliation.org.au). Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have to prove their connection to the land and prove that they have not done anything to break their connection to their land such as selling the land (www.reconciliation.org.au). There are different ways to look at the Native Title as some Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders may be granted the right to live on the land and live as how they traditionally lived (www.reconciliation.org.au). The Native Title act is important because it determines how Native Title interests are formally documented and acknowledged (www.reconciliation.org.au). It sets the rules for dealing with land where native title still exists or may exist

Show More
Related

Land Rights Movement: The Mabo Case And Wik Decision

888 Words | 4 Pages

The three land rights movement, Native title, Mabo and Wik have an essential importance and significance to the Aboriginal people. The Native title: The Native title is of great importance for the land rights movement and for the Aboriginal Dreaming. The Native title recognises the rights of indigenous people on relation to the areas of land and water belonging to their particular

Read More

Why Was The Mabo Decision Important

370 Words | 2 Pages

The Mabo Decision was the turning point for the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights. Firstly, the Mabo Decision was significant because the decision was the lead up to the recognition of Aboriginal Rights. The Mabo Decision was the movement that made everyone fully recognise the Aboriginal people as humans, and official citizens of the country. The Decision also raised awareness to the discrimination the Aboriginal people were facing before the referendum.

Read More

Success Of The 1967 Regretedum In Relation To Aboriginal People

1125 Words | 5 Pages

As stated in the handout given in class, “The referendum provided a vehicle for change by empowering the Commonwealth to protectionism and assimilation.” Before the referendum, the States of Australia made laws which discriminated against and denied basic human rights such as being free to live where they wish, having access to education, receiving the same wages as non-Aboriginal people, etc. to Aboriginal people. The referendum did not guarantee such change — For the first five years after the referendum the Australian Government did not make any significant changes, as the referendum did not actually give the government full responsibility to make positive changes for Aboriginal people, it simply “opened the door for Australian Government involvement” as put by the Australian Constitution and 1967 Referendum Fact Sheet. The ongoing political commitment would be the only way to make sure the changes stayed in place; Something that fell short 50 years

Read More

How Did The Tent Embassy Affect Australia

720 Words | 3 Pages

This was all through the persistency of the protesting and riots. It as was stated by the Australian government “The Aboriginal Land Rights Act. The Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 was the first attempt by an Australian government to legally recognize the Aboriginal system of land ownership and put into law the concept of inalienable freehold title. The Land Rights Act is a fundamental piece of social reform.” (History Of Land Rights Acts , n.d.)

Read More

What Is Jeff Kennett Speech Against Aboriginal Australia

1740 Words | 7 Pages

The Commonwealth was completely unprepared, and as the Mabo story gained traction, apathy started to fade away, knocking down any political policy the government had set out to conquer at the beginning of its term. On 3 June, 1992, the High Court of Australia rejected the doctrine of terra nullius and recognised Indigenous land rights for the first time. In doing so, the Commonwealth had admitted that the Indigenous peoples had lived in Australia for thousands of years, that their land had slowly dissolved into the colonies as they grew, underwriting the Australian identity. This lack

Read More

Noel Pearson's Article 'Reconciliation'

707 Words | 3 Pages

He claims that Australia has relied on the lie of terra nullius for over 200 years until the High Court’s decision on native title in the Mabo Case. Pearson quotes that "There has never been formal recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia. " By frequently referring to the lack of recognition, Pearson indicates that Indigenous Australians' history has not been accurately represented. Pearson argues that "the new Australia never recognized the old Australia", and still has not in any formal and real sense. Pearson's purpose in highlighting this is to draw attention to the historical injustices that indigenous Australians have faced and the need to rectify them.

Read More

Bringing Them Home Report Essay

681 Words | 3 Pages

Bringing Them Home Report Today, our society live freely by following our right and freedom, our rights to do and our freedom to say. However, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders suffered and are still suffering through a long journey to be accepted in Australia as one. Different events occurred during the 90s to today, such as the Mabo decision, referendums and protests. The Bringing Them Home report was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander people. The Bringing Them

Read More

Australia's Racial Discrimination Act Of 1975

185 Words | 1 Pages

Both Australia and the United States have experienced difficulties relating to racial equality over the years. While both countries have demonstrated a commitment to addressing these racial equality issues, Australia’s commitment has been stronger. This is proved by Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, which prohibits “any act involving a distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnical origin which has the purpose of effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of any human right or fundamental freedom”. Whenever a large event is held in Australia, there is someone acknowledging the traditional owners of the land that they are

Read More

Arguments Against Native Title

999 Words | 4 Pages

Native title ’Native title’ refers to the recognition that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (ATSI) have rights to their traditional lands. For many years, native title has been an on-going topic across Australia, with many people disliking the concept. However, due to Australia’s changing social values and new concepts of justice, it has now been recently addressed. It is through the legal mechanisms such as the ALRC, the NSWLRC, the parliament and the courts and the non legal mechanism, the media that has been a catalyst for law reform for native title. Such mechanisms, have helped cases like the Mabo v Queensland [1988]

Read More

Aboriginal Rights In Australia

684 Words | 3 Pages

Kevin Rudd 's sorry speech did heavily effect the freedoms and rights of Indigenous Australians, but also left a slightly negative feel towards the Aboriginals as

Read More

Denomination Switching Essay

441 Words | 2 Pages

Mabo: The Mabo case was a judgment in the High Court of Australia in 1992 affirming that Aboriginal people could still have rights to land taken by settlers. Wik: The Wik decision was a legal judgment made in Australia in 1996 that protects the right of Aboriginal people to own land. However, it stated that Native Title could co-exist with other rights on land under pastoral lease but, if there is a conflict between Native Title and lease, the rights of the leaseholder will

Read More

The Legacy Of Eddie Mabo, A Milestone Of Hope For Indigenous Australia

561 Words | 3 Pages

The Legacy of Eddie Mabo, a Milestone of Hope for Indigenous Australia Introduction The life and legacy of Eddie Koiki Mabo continues to be one of the most influential and hopeful milestones in the reconciliation of Australia’s indigenous people. Against all odds, Mabo strived and succeeded in claiming back land rights that were taken away by settlers and brought significance to the land claims of indigenous people. However, this was not a case of one man’s right to land, but a case of many cultures’ right to hope. Eddie Mabo’s legal victory against the Australian government provided hope for the future of culture, traditions and custodians of Indigenous Australia.

Read More

How Did Eddie Mabo Change Australia

902 Words | 4 Pages

To be granted 'native title ' they must prove that they have not done anything to break their connection to the land, such as selling or leasing the

Read More

Aboriginal Protection Boards

1329 Words | 6 Pages

Crucial civil liberties such as employment, custody of kids and management over private property were removed, which indicates that Aboriginal people were subject to just about entire control. British peoples ' focal aspiration of complete power is further depicted when Broome (2010, p.173) argues that the Boards wanted to reject Aboriginality altogether when it declined to acknowledge any Aboriginal people as Indigenous within Victoria. The effort to completely disregard or eliminate the Aboriginal way of life would have produced severe social impacts such as emotional and psychological pain; consequentially resulting in a sense of alienation and a loss of social identity. The rejection and isolation of the Aborigines from mainstream society strongly signifies that the actions used by Aboriginal Protection Boards were attempts to dispossess,

Read More

Effects Of Racism In Australia

1176 Words | 5 Pages

Britain was the biggest colony power in the world. Even the fall of the First Empire did not discourage the British from further colonization of ‘’unknown lands’’. In 1770, Captain James Cook claimed a portion of the Australian continent in the name of King George III. On his journey from Botany Bay to Cape York, Cook recorded several interactions with the indigenous population of Australia. Despite knowing about the continent being inhabited by one of the Earth’s oldest civilizations, Great Britain considered Australia terra nullius - land belonging to no one.

Read More

More about The Mabo Case: Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanderss

Open Document