Seventy-two years after we dropped the first one, the atomic bomb and the choice to drop two of them on Japan is still debated today. Was it a just decision? Could it have been avoided? Was the decision rushed? Was the dropping of the bombs necessary? The answers to these questions depend on who you ask. If I was given the option to drop the atomic bomb, I wouldn’t have done it the same way as Truman, although I do understand why he did given the details surrounding his choice. When Truman was first given the details of the atomic bomb, he had been president no more than half an hour. He was told Roosevelt had already authorized the dropping of the bomb before his death. Truman writes, “I was still stunned by Roosevelt’s death and by the …show more content…
yet. The Japanese were willing to give up their lives for their country. They “...were self-proclaimed fanatic warriors who...preferred death to defeat in battle.” The Japanese were not going to surrender following the Germans. It can be argued the Germans weren’t quite as dedicated as the Japanese. Truman mentions how he implored the Japanese to surrender in his speech announcing the surrender of the Germans. He remembers being “...not too surprised when they refused.” Through the eyes of Truman, I acknowledge the fact that he believed this was the only way to stop the Japanese and save American lives. I believe dropping the atomic bomb was essential to making sure other countries knew the power of this weapon and ensuring a weapon of this magnitude would never be used again. Although I believe this, I also think the U.S. could have dropped the bomb on an uninhibited island. This would have still shown the destructive force of this weapon, but wouldn’t have killed as many people or poisoned them with radiation. I also feel the U.S. wasn’t entirely to blame. We gave the Japanese a (vague) warning and they chose to not heed it. I consider the idea that is we had not used the
Sure, Truman may have realized that he might be able to “put down” the Soviet Union and force the Japanese to surrender, sort of a kill two birds with one stone. However, implying that this was the impelling reason for President Truman wanting to drop the bomb is absurd. Two major pieces of evidence used in this argument are the fact that the Soviet Union’s entry into the war almost certainly pressured the Japanese into surrender, and that General Dwight D. Eisenhower asked Secretary of War Henry L Stimson personally to not drop the bomb while at Potsdam. With the Soviet Union’s entry into the war, it was only likely that Japan would surrender. If they didn’t, that would still lead to Operation Downfall, and that was not an option President Truman wanted.
Even though dropping the bomb on Japan was controversial it was the only way to end this war. Following, like what Justice Chamber said: “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?”(Doc 3), Japan was different than any other country that US faced because Japan committed inhuman and selfless actions just to kill more US
Truman was elected as president on 12 April 1945 within 3 months, following the sudden death of Franklin D. Roosevelt. During his first two months in office, Truman made the decision to drop the atomic bomb in Japan. “Nobody is more disturbed over the use of atomic bombs than I am but I was greatly disturbed over the unwarranted attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbour and their murder of our prisoners of war. The only language they seem to understand is the one we have been using to bombard them. When You have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast.
The dropping of the atomic bomb was a pivotal moment of U.S. history. Harry S. Truman was put under a lot of pressure and spent a lot of time trying to decide whether to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki or not. There were many people telling Truman reasons why he should or should not drop the bomb as well. As for my opinion, I think that Harry S. Truman should not have dropped the bomb. The atomic bomb is dangerous and, in my opinion, should not have even been made in the first place because of how life threatening it is.
I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.
The Article also stated that Truman was forced to keep fighting because “ “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender.” If I was him I wouldn’t have stopped up until they surrendered. The bombings was one of the most terrible things to happen but they didn’t surrender and so I would have kept fighting. Even though the bombing was unconventional he was able to almost completely destroy Tokyo. In which, the bombing was a source of having less soldiers on the Japanese side.
The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan is a decision that has been debated since the bomb fell. While Truman may have made the decision because he felt it was “ethical,” the actual amount of ethics in the decision has been up for debate. The atomic bomb had been in design before Truman stepped up to president when Franklin D. Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage in April of 1945. The atomic bomb had actually been in development since Albert Einstein warned the United States that Germany was trying to develop an atomic bomb of its own in 1939.
Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
The decision that brought death to cover a hundred thousand Japanese…” As you can tell, the U.S already knew the what would happen if they dropped the bomb, but dropped it
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.
Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.
The president and the Allied powers gave further warning about the bomb and even issued a final compromise, Japan still didn’t do anything and refused to cooperate, which forced the US to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Even though the bomb caused the deaths of many innocent civilians, it still caused less deaths than how many would have remained if they didn’t drop the bomb, and they also explain how Japan refused to cooperate and only lied and committed many war crimes and atrocities. The bomb was dropped also because of all the war crimes the Japanese committed. The Japanese military committed many atrocities. The article contradicts, “Opponents of the bomb were adamant that there were other options available to the
To end the horrific ongoing crisis, Truman made a thought-through decision to allow the two bombs to be dropped. Although over fifteen hundred thousand individual’s lives were shattered, after the two final atomic bombs were dropped, when Japan surrendered millions of lives were saved, the Soviet Union had been intimidated into leaving Japan alone, and the war was no longer prolonged after four whole years of horror.
President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.