France, as a nation was divided into three estates. The first estate included the clergy, the second including the nobility, and the third included of the commoners which were 96-98% of the population. One of the factors that set the 3 estates apart was taxation. The first two estates earned a lot of money while paid little or no taxes. However, the third estate paid the highest amount of taxes and did not earn very much, hence taxation burdened the third estate.
Wealth is generally considered as the major definer of one’s class, but there are other factors such as culture, prestige, identity and the system. One of the indicators of status is the style of clothing. Fashion has always been a way of distinguishing class since the price, brand, and style of one’s clothing reveal their economic standing and culture. Only people from the upper class are able to afford luxurious, fancy, and expensive-looking clothing used to be considered high-end fashion and was a status of symbol. This trend in fashion was very undemocratic because only rich people were able to afford what was accepted as fashionable.
Life in England during the Victorian Era was not easy. It was especially tough on those of the lower, poorer, social classes. The way they lived was based off of how much money a family had. Families often had to work, and could spend little time together during this harsh time period. A family 's’ position in society was how wealthy they were.
These patricians controlled and highly influenced the direction of laws. Although, there were a set of laws for all citizens had to follow, this including the patricians, they always seemed to benefit the higher up class of people. These laws were actually never written down either but instead handed down from patrician to patrician. This made and helped them adjust certain laws when needed to stay in control and continue to stay extremely wealthy. For the lower class of people, the plebeian citizens continued to only become poorer and in more debt to the patricians.
The Great Gatsby Essay F. Scott Fitzgerald was a famous author who wrote the book, The Great Gatsby. His purpose in writing this book was to show the differences between old and new money. Old money meaning people being born into wealthy lifestyles and new money meaning people who were not born with money but gained a lot of wealth. These were separated by two areas called west egg and east egg. This book gives sort of an exclusive look into the luxury and glamour that people think is the life of a person with a high amount of wealth.
The lifestyle of these two groups of people are significantly different, but also have some aspects in which they are similar. To begin with, The gap between the rich and the poor was extremely noticeable and due to this gap, the rich lived a lavish life of big business, while the poor were struggling to survive. This created numerous differences between the way that the rich and the poor lived. One the most obvious differences between the rich and the poor would be the conditions in which they lived due to the fact that they were from completely different economic status. The lavish lifestyle that the rich rich maintained, meant that “some of the richest urban residents lived in palatial mansions located in exclusive neighborhood in the heart of the city- FIfth Avenue in New York, Back Bay and Beacon Hill in Boston, Society Hill in Philadelphia, Lake Shore Drive in Chicago, Nob HIll in San Francisco, and many other.” On the other hand, the
High Versus Low Class Social class is an issue among people all over the world due to earning wages and quality of life. Lower class people are often envious of the upper-class community because of their salaries. Upper-class people are often spiteful of some lower class for the job titles they hold. The poems “What Work Is,” by Philip Levine, “Singapore,” by Mary Oliver, and “The Restaurant Business,” by James Tate focus on the issue of social class and feelings towards other classes. These poems portray this theme by use of analogies, personification, and imagery.
The nobility, which made up a little over 1% of the population owned important portions of the land, were very wealthy. Those aristocrats had pleasant living conditions, supported the Nicholas II, and most didn’t want a revolution to occur. The middle classes were wealthy, and had good living conditions. Although the bourgeoisie’s living conditions were more than sufficient, they weren’t satisfied by the Tsar’s autocracy. The workers on the contrary, had far worse living conditions.
I believe one of the biggest causes was the unfair taxes. The unfair taxes was a cause for the french revolution. Despite being unprivileged of basic human rights, the third estate was also very heavily taxed. The third estate had very high taxes on many things. There was taxes on their land and produces [Document 1] In the diagram of [Document 2] The third estate had lots more land but that they had to pay more for there taxes.
Mostly rich people are not hard workers; they love to sit and Oder things. They are not as much skillful too. But just because of having money they rule on middle class and poor people. Rich people mostly consider themselves superior and others inferiors. Middle class people are much skillful as compaired to rich ones.