During harry S. Truman's presidency he was faced with one of the most world altering decisions in the war against japan. The use of atomic weapons would set an example of the united states of america’s military strength,power and knowledge of a very destructive technology. It was necessary for president Truman to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for these reasons. American soilders were tired from the four years of fighting and a surrender from Japan was not in sight..In (Doc L) it says the bomb saved more lives than killed people in the end, President Truman needed to retaliate for their attack on Pearl Harbor and the bomb would just end the war more quicker. Colonel Tibbets states in (Doc L) “ I was anxious to do it...I wanted to do everything that i could to subdo Japan.” Tibbets felt no remorse and truly believed japan needed to be stopped. The weapons were created to be used and if they were not it would be morally wrong. Japan was asked to surrender several times but continued to refuse. For Truman it left no choice. …show more content…
military ship known as the U.S.S Arizona as it sat in the waters off of the Hawaiian island of O’ahu. Over eleven hundred sailors and marines perished in the waters below the burning ship. Japans motivation to strick the U.S. was to capture our natural resources that japan lacked. The U.S. was taken by suprise as they were currently in peace talks and also felt that the warning signs that appeared on the radar screens were not valid.This began our entrence into world war two and to the many desioins the U.S. would have to make. In (Doc A) we see the devistation in the photograph of the U.S.S. Arizona as it burned for two days after the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Harry S. Truman, 33rd President of the United States, infamously used atomic bombs against Japan during World War II. Truman chose to utilize these catastrophic weapons in order to save American lives as well as accelerate this agonizing war. The effects of the bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were utterly devastating. While the immediate death toll was colossal, an immeasurable number of deaths ensued. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused roughly 180,000 deaths.
These lives of innocent civilians were lost on top of countless amount of people who were affected by radiation. No matter how good their reasoning for using these types of weapons, President Truman should not have used them. An argument to drop the atomic brom, from a military standpoint, is that using these weapons could put America superior over other nations. Dropping these atomic bombs would make other countries fear the United States army. With other countries fearing the United States, that could result in Americans being more safe, because no country would want to mess with our military.
President Harry S. Truman dropped many nuclear bombs on the Empire of Japan in 1995 to end World War II. This event caused many people to question whether they thought it is justified or if there were other things that could have been better. There are three reasons why I believe that what he did was right. Because it ended World War II quicker, to show Japan that it would have been easier to surrender, and the events that occurred during Pearl Harbor.
Harry S. Truman, 33rd President of the United States Harry S. Truman was a pioneer of civil rights and human medical relief. His action’s convinced the rest of the world that change in discrimination needs to happen. Harry S. Truman created a new standard for human civil rights, persisted in the innovation of war time relief efforts and human aid, and impacted society by shaping life in the United States after the war was ended. It is clear that Harry S. Truman’s goal was to establish to new way of handling unfair discrimination in America. Harry S. Truman also, however, made one of the biggest and hardest decisions in his career, and in American, or even world history.
The US thought they were ahead because the Japanese would not be able to bomb in that amount of shallow water, but the Japanese proved them wrong. This triggered anger throughout the country since most of the United States oil reserves and most of the naval fleet is stationed there. Since this event happened, the United States declared on the Axis Alliance. This lead to a series of events that will have changed the world forever in an irreversible way, including the use of the nuclear bombs that were dropped on Japan in the beginning of August.
“President Truman had four options: 1) continue conventional bombing of japanese cities; 2) invade Japan; 3) demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island; or, 4)drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city” (Harry S Truman Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb). If president Truman would have continued with option one, then America would not have been any closer to ending this war. Option two would have resulted in not only Japanese casualties, but also the casualties of the American people. Option three was not an effective plan as well because of many reasons. One being that the effects were uncertain.
Three key reasons why former President Truman launched the atomic bomb on Japan are because Japan viciously surprised attack Pearl Harbor, he genuinely thought this was the only way to end the war, and he wanted to prevent the lives of more troops from being lost in an ongoing
The decision to use the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender was the best option available to the U.S. at the time to end the war in the Pacific. Following the Allied victory in Europe, the United States was in the position of simultaneously celebrating Germany's defeat and the return of American troops, while shifting its focus to the war in the Pacific. The war in the Pacific had long been on the back burner due to the Germany first agreement, but upon Allied victory, the U.S. faced the possibility of continuing the war in the Pacific with no clear end in sight. As the leader of a nation that was war-weary and ready to return to life as normal, President Truman was in the unenviable position of determining the best course of action to bring the war in the Pacific to an expedient conclusion. Upon reviewing the alternatives with his closest advisors, President Truman issued the order for the military to drop two atomic bombs on Japan.
The direct cause of the ending of World War II was the decision, made by President Truman, to drop the atomic bombs in the cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The nuclear weapon killed a numerous amount of faultless people, estimated to be 70,000 residents in Hiroshima alone. Throughout the course of making the atomic bomb, there were even mixed feelings coming from the sides of the scientists as well as the military. The idea of the atomic bomb came about when the United States wanted a method where the result will outcome in less innocent American casualties. This notion has now become a very controversial issue where there are arguments on both sides.
How did President Truman come to the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan as a means to end World War 2? President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on japan to save people from agony and pain. Even though the two bomb killed more than 200,000 Japanese civilians, it saved American soldiers. For this reason, President Truman thought that dropping these bombs was for the greater good. How did the atomic bomb become a factor to end World War 2?
This further separates him from the group, by not getting very involved in the drama Mr. Truman remains and individual, never falling into anybody's plot. Mr truman faces his problems head on generally with some sort of violence, but none the less by bypassing the unnecessary drama he is able to resolve most of the other characters problems simply by rejecting to conform and approaching the problems his own unique way. He also fights for others to do the same such as Gertrude. “I had her taught true independence she had hands capacities and should use them! Money should never buy her a husband!
The article ends with how the U.S was successful in it’s use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender in World War II. This article is relevant to my thesis, because it helps me learn about what made the the Japanese surrender, and how the violence from the Americans veered their decisions to compromise with them. It provides me valuable insight on the American government's thought process and plan to destroy Japan, as well as evidence on how massive the atomic bomb really was and how much it impacted the Japanese. This article is very trustworthy because it is the exact words of the secretary of war on February 1947; Henry L.Stimson. Also, the source is reliable because it is from a popular database and greatly worked with and used by many
President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.
On August 6, 1945, an American B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima in Japan. Although the Allies had poured their resources into defeating Japan after the defeat of Germany and Italy in Europe, the road to victory appeared long and costly. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb against Japan after consulting with his advisors and determining that it would save American lives. President Truman along with other Allied leaders issued a warning to Japan to surrender or face “complete destruction” and “utter devastation,” which the Japanese had ignored causing the United States to take action. (Ellis & Esler, 2009)
Introduction In this essay, I will analyse the speech by US President Truman and discuss the arguments put forward by different scholars Escobar (1995), Edward Said (1993), Abu-Lughod (2002), Santos et al. (2007) and Sawicki (1991) regarding how power relations play a role in promoting or hindering development. Truman described his 1949 speech as a “fair deal” for the entire world towards attaining development (Escobar 1995:3).