ipl-logo

Utilitarianism: Morally Right Or Wrong?

706 Words3 Pages

Utilitarianism is when an effort is made to try and provide an answer to a practical question. Utilitarianism relies on a theory of intrinsic value. They believe it’s possible to compare the intrinsic value to compare two actions and predict which one would have a better consequence. Utilitarian’s don’t always refer to a choice as a moral issue (West). According to Mill, “acts should be classified as morally right or wrong only if the consequences are of such significance that a person would wish to see the agent compelled, not merely persuaded, and exhorted, to act in a preferred matter. A moralist can sum up the units of pleasure and the units of pain for everyone likely to be affected, immediately and in the future, and could take the balance as a measure of the overall good or evil tendency of an action” (West). The moral value of an action can be based on what is called hedonism. This says the only thing can be good is pleasure or happiness. Utilitarianism shows how moral questions can have objectively true answers. This provides a method to figure out …show more content…

He also does not think you deserve moral credit when you do the right thing to someone because you expect to get something out of it. Kant believes that if you do something that benefits you it’s easy and doesn’t require much effort and you aren’t going out of your way to help someone else. He says that when you do the right thing it’s because it’s your duty and morally right and you know that you did the right thing and made a difference. It required some actual time and effort that didn’t benefit you in anyway except that it’s your duty. Kant feels that we must use reason and logic to get credit and you know when you have done the right thing. Then after performing these duties and using reason you will deserve moral credit and know that what you did was the right thing to do

Show More
Related

  • Importance Of Utilitarianism In Marketing To Children

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    It states that an action which is deemed right is one that has not merely some good consequences, but also the greatest amount of good consequences possible when the negative consequences are also given due considerations. According to the utilitarian principle, the righteousness of an action is solely judged on the basis of its consequences. Classical utilitarianism determines the balance of pleasure and pain for each individual affected by the action in question as well as the amount of utility for the whole

    Read More

  • The Trolley Problem By Phillipa Foot

    1146 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kant also had certain actions that were considered always immoral such as killing another rational human being. In trolley problem terms kant would not pull the lever because you are doing an immoral thing. If you were to pull the lever even though it is to save 5 people you are still killing that one person. This shows that Kant, no matter how many people are on that track, would not divert the track to kill that one person. This is important

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues In Utilitarianism

    1010 Words  | 5 Pages

    A number of problems surround the second question; the most obvious of which are limited time, the limited capacity of human foresight to calculate the maximum number of happiness, and the inability of the theory to advise on the time frame utilitarianism is to be applied to; how do you know the maximum number of happiness for the next 10 years doesn’t mean greater overall unhappiness in the next 50 years, so what time period should one keep in mind when considering an issue from a utilitarian stand point, 1 year, 5 years, 10, 20? This lack of clarity further adds to the impractical nature of the ideology. There are a myriad number of situations which seem very difficult to resolve without employing utilitarian principles and a very good example is the widespread use of utilitarian principles in bioethics. The best example here would obviously be the famous case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie. The facts in front of the court indicated that Mary was the parasitic twin who shared a heart with Jodie.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Promise By John Stuart Mill Summary And Analysis

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    So, Kant’s . Is that a person should not do favors for others if they are only hoping to receive equal or more pay out instead of just doing what’s right for someone.

    Read More

  • Objection To Act Utilitarianism

    1217 Words  | 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to act and rule utilitarianism and proving that utilitarianism is untenable. Both act and rule utilitarianism attempt to argue that what is right or wrong can be proven by what morally increases the well being of people. Act utilitarianism argues that

    Read More

  • On A Supposed Right To Lie From Altruistic Motives Analysis

    180 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his brief essay, “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Altruistic Motives”, Immanuel Kant emphasizes how essential it is to be truthful and how our duty to be truthful outweighs any other duties we have to ourselves to ourselves or to humanity. Altruistic can be described as a genuinely moral act. People who are altruistic take action for the benefit of others and deem other people’s interests more important than their own interests. Kant believes that people should always do what is right, no matter what the outcome holds. I affirm that Kant believes praising truthfulness above all other duties because he believes it is morally wrong to hurt the dignity of others.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

    1711 Words  | 7 Pages

    Suppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    1564 Words  | 7 Pages

    (Mill, utilitarianism, p.697) To put this into simpler terms, Mill is essentially saying events or experiences are desirable only when it is a source for pleasure, so actions are good when they lead to higher levels of general happiness and they are deemed as bad when it lowers your general level of happiness. However, it is important to note utilitarianism doesn’t say it is morally right for everyone to purse what make them alone happy but instead morality is dictated by what increases the total amount of utility in the world. Pursuing your own happiness at the expense of the majority of social happiness would be viewed as wrong by utilitarian’s. Mill then proceeded to say that morality requires impartial consideration of the interest of everyone involved, its not just about your own happiness.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Business Ethics

    1685 Words  | 7 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism: Greatest Good For The Greatest Number Of People

    304 Words  | 2 Pages

    III. The Concept of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism refers to the ethical conduct which maximizes the largest number of interests and reduces harm or costs (Landry et al. , 2004). This is ingrained in the aspiration to generate the most favorable outcome, in a way to balance the gain attained and the degree of damage endured through the process. Furthermore, Karande et al.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    He says that one must act not only in accordance to duty, but for the sake of duty However, According to the Utilitarianism, Mill emphasizes that the actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness Immanuel Kant is the founder of the Kantian branch of ethics and morality, and his theories are personally my favorite theory of ethics so far. According to the utilitarianism, the best action is the one that maximizes utility. However, in Kant’s moral philosophy, people

    Read More

  • Feeding The Hungry Analysis

    786 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant clarifies that consequences are not important, the primary thing in action is intentional. In this issue, it is not possible that all people help the hungry because of that they have these intentions. There is always one who says that nobody can blame me because of that I did not make them hungry. Moreover, Kant classifies the duty according to its certainty. He defines the perfect duty as a perfect duty such as telling the truth which is not flexible and all people must obey.

    Read More

  • Kant's Necessary Evil

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant felt very strongly about how people were supposed to act. According to the Categorical Imperative, he said, “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only” (Rachels, 139). Since humans are so valuable, we need to treat them “as an end”. This means you need to treat them well; respect their rights, avoid harming them, and promote their welfare. To treat people “as an end” according to Kant is, “as beings who (can) contain in themselves the end of the very same action” (Rachels, 139).

    Read More

  • Kantian Theory Of Morality

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    Also, volunteering to sell our organs does not mean losing altruistic values of giving an organ and commodifying does not mean the only thing of value is money. In Kantian theory, you must perform the right action for the right reasons. The good will is the good in itself. Reasons, means what makes a good will good, is its compliance to act in accordance with the obligations dictated by reason.

    Read More

More about Utilitarianism: Morally Right Or Wrong?

Open Document