The scandalous 19th century trial of Lizzie Borden, a wealthy women who so is accused of murdering her parents with an ax, is back. Despite if you believe that Lizzie killed them or not, is your opinion. Lizzie had much evidence to be blamed for. Perhaps not all the blame should be aspired towards her, but there is enough evidence that can charged against her. Even though Lizzie adored her father, but she completely hated her stepmother. Even though there was a lot of evidence that proved Lizzie was innocent, the evidence that proved her guilt was much more reliable and trustworthy. Lizzie did actually commit these murders because she had tried to buy prussic acid, she had burned a dress that supposedly had paint on it, and because even the own nursery rhyme states that because she had killed her stepmother she was afraid that her father would suspect of her, so she decided to kill him as well …show more content…
She had been taken into questioning on June 1893. An all-male jury deliberated and returned saying that she was not guilty but can we really trust an all-male jury group? They obviously would not say she guilty because she was a women and they wouldn’t do something to her to make her go to jail. In my opinion, I strongly believe that Lizzie Borden is guilty of killing both her parents because she attempted to buy prussic acid, she burned a dress that supposedly had paint on it, and the ‘nursery rhyme” even states what could have actually happened during the times of the murders. Lizzie had much reasons to be blamed for this. It had been claimed that Lizzie tried her best to cover up things that happened. During the testimony and questioning of Lizzie, she would hesitate a lot while she spoke and she would say that she didn’t want to answer many of the questions. Overall, this “media sensation” has been around for many years and the perspectives of everyone set a eerie
The Accused Lizzie Borden Lizzie Andrew Borden is suspected for the murder of her father and stepmother. In my opinion, she DID kill them. The 32-year-old had a motive, which would likely be gaining her father’s inheritance of money and property. She felt was owed to her, since she was his daughter.
She did, Lizzie Borden murdered her parents, then got questioned, and then burned a dress that she claimed was ruined by “paint stains.” Although Lizzie could have burned the dress because of paint stains, why would she be worried about burning dresses when who she claimed to be the best father ever just died? Lizzie would of course be devastated if her father had died so why would she be burning dresses right after the murder happened. Lizzie could have easily lied and said the dress was burned due to paint stains, but if that was the dress she murdered her parents in it would have gotten blood on it and that’s why she wanted to get rid of it.
How would you all react if you had just walked into the family room and you saw that your blood father had a big whole in his head and he was covered in blood. According to, ‘Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation?,’ “Lizzie’s actions in the days after the murders also raised eyebrows: She gave contradictory answers to questions.” During the trial, Lizzie was medicated so heavily she most likely wasn’t totally aware so she couldn’t give the clearest answers. Most likely, she was very angry about the situation so she was not able to express all of her beliefs or describe the whole situation without telling all of her emotions. Even if people are a little mentally unstable, they don’t kill their parents, it would have to be somebody
“THE LIZZIE BORDEN CASE” On August 4, 1892, Andrew and Abby Borden were murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts. Lizzie Borden convicted of the murder and arrested on August 11, 1892. It seems obvious that Lizzie committed the crime due to the evidence provided, family problems and, the brutal nature of the murder. Lizzie and her family had problems, which means this could have led Lizzie to murder her parents.
Although they didn't find her guilty with the evidence I portrayed to you to day it is pretty clear to say that she was the axe murderer. All my reasons and up the main summary is that she tried hiding the evidence and tried leaving no bloody footprints to herself. Lizzie borden is a true master mind to get away with murder and on top of that stay in that same town. Wait why did she stay in that town you might ask if she did kill her parents. Well the answer to that is simple she hid in plain
While in custody she could not repeat the same story about her whereabouts, making her even more suspicious (Linder 1995). Given that Lizzie Borden did not have a lawyer at the time of testimony it was not admissible in court (Linder 1995). The police speculated that the murder had to be someone from the house and since Lizzie Borden’s sister was out of town the blame fell on her (Linder 1995). During the trial the police did not find any evidence against Lizzie Borden therefore, just after one hour of deliberations the jury decided that she was not guilty (Linder
I have done enough research to know that there are three reasons why Lizzie didn’t commit this hideous crime. There were other people home at the time of the murder. The night before the murder John Morse, the uncle, showed up unexpectedly. In her statement to the police, Lizzie was outside at the time of the murder, so she wasn’t in the
Instead of being scared and afraid of what might happen too her, she wasn’t worried at all and somewhat excited about been listed as a suspect. Her sister was more frightened about what might happen then she was and the maid was very surprised about the death. Lizzie was very confident with her story as if she was planning everything out for a while, this explains why going to the police station for questions wasn’t a bad thing too her. One reason Lizzie is guilty,she stated the night before that
She couldn’t be in the barn because Bridget Sullivan would have seen her whilst running between the windows and the barn to refill her pail. The same goes for if Lizzie was outside. All of theses defenses that seem to have all happened at the same time are proof that Lizzie is guilty for murdering her parents. Even if they were made up due to Morphine, the very first one she gave, being in the barn getting a piece of iron was definitely a white lie, because neighbors and the maid have seen
I believe that Lizzie Borden did not kill her parents because of her testimony, her letters written from her time in prison, and her visit to her neighbor the day before the murder. The evidence provided shows a new light to the case of Lizzie Borden. A significant fact that proves Lizzie was innocent is her testimony.
In Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation it states that “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders” There was no evidence that she did the murders. They didn't question anybody but Lizzie. Anyone could have done it. This just proves that Lizzie did not do
Although there was limited concrete evidence to convict her guilty beyond reasonable doubt, it is safe to assume she committed the murder. Margaret Hossack should be convicted guilty of the murder of her husband, due to the holes in her defense case, the history of the couple’s unsteady relationship, and a financial induced motive (Bovsun). The defense by Mrs. Hossack was questioned repeatedly by the prosecutors, and rightfully so. There were too many holes in her defense claim and story.
During the trials, even some active accusers and the magistrate were doubtful of her accusations because of her respectable reputation (Linder). Moreover, Rebecca was innocent because she never confessed to her accusation and responded, “I am innocent and God will clear my innocency” (Ray). Also, the first jury’s verdict on her of “Not Guilty” and the probation granted by Governor Phips that proved her innocence were purposely overturned by her rivals and accusers (Ray). In
I’ve looked over and over the paper’s and I think that Lizzie Borden didn’t kill her parents, for multiple reasons. The first reason is the defense exploited the government about the timing isn’t right. The second reason is that Charles Gifford and Uriah Kirby reported seeing a strange man near the house. Last but not least the third reason is they found an ax head and assumed it was hers, and they had no proof that it was.
In 1892 the father and stepmother of Lizzie Borden is found dead by the maid of the family. Lizzie is accused of the murder but is later acquitted. The play takes place 10 years later with a re-enactment of the events, but with The Actress, Lizzie’s lover, playing as Lizzie and with Lizzie playing the other roles. We learn through the course of the re-enactment that Lizzie, as a woman in the 19th century has very little control over her situation. She is unable to earn any money and must rely on her father’s inheritance to be independent.