Court Essays

The States Courts would likely hear case (a) and the Federal Courts would likely hear case (c). Sometimes, the jurisdiction of state courts will overlap with that of federal courts, meaning that some cases can be brought in both courts. With that being said, both cases (b) and (d) are prime examples of the overlap. With cases (b) and (d) being able to go to either to state or federal courts, we then need to find the determining factors to what court would be the proper one for the cases. For instance

The court of common pleas operates in what appears to be a very systematic way. What I mean by that is everything is according to numbers. They call your court case number and then your name, at that point if the person is present they step up and ask for an extension and the judge determines whether or not the person will be trailed or allowed an extension. Unfortunately, I was unable to witness the process of a trail. Lots of people did not show up and when the judge did issue a trailing the person

Distinction is between courts of original jurisdiction and courts of appellate, or review, jurisdiction. Courts having original jurisdiction are courts of the the first instance, or trial courts. Almost every case begins in a trial court. It is in this court that a trial (or a guilty plea) takes place, and the judge imposes a sentence if the defendant is found guilty. Trial courts are primarily concerned with questions of fact. They are designed to determine what exactly events occurred that are

adult courts. Transfers, waivers, and certifications are all a formal procedures of moving a juvenile to adult court for trial instead of allowing them to remain in juvenile court. By moving a juvenile to adult court, it is then possible for harsher punishments to be imposed, for just deserts and severe punishments for violent offenders, fairness in administering punishments suitable because of one’s actions, a deterrent to decrease juvenile violence, less leniency compared to the juvenile court system

College Dictionary a court hearing is a court appearance before a judge or court referee, other than an actual formal trial or a formal meeting, as of an investigative body or legislative committee, before which evidence is presented, or a testimony is given. In The Crucible By Arthur Miller, the court ties religion into cases by asking biblical based questions and asking accused people about the accused religious habits such as how often the accused go to church also the court can be somewhat biased

Just about everything happens in the court room however, it does seem confusing to someone who hasn’t experienced the justice system first hand. In order to conduct hearings efficiently, there is a pre-set order and all proceedings are carried out according to a certain procedure (n.d). All details are pre-deferred such as who stands there, who stands where, who takes the floor when and who are allowed to be in the court room or not allowed (n.d). The room is situated in a way which is abide by these

Magistrates Court Courts are an integral part of the Australian Legal system and the Magistrate Court is most offenders first and last point of call in their criminal trial. This report aims to outline the procedure of a hearing held in the Magistrates court as well as evaluating whether the process is fair. Observations were made at a local Magistrates court and a case will be utilized to assist in explaining the court process. Court Hearing: During a hearing in the Magistrates Court there are

Federal court processes have four steps, the frist step is the initial stages, the second is the pre-trial proceedings, the third step is the trial and guilty pleas and the final step is sentencing and post-judgment proceedings. Criminal cases are process through a clerk office which is tied to the federal court. The clerks office aids the court by processing criminal cases through the federal system in a timely order. The clerks office help both parties in the producers by organizing and followed

Court System Controversy Although there is a standard for courtrooms and how they should function it is, nevertheless, unrealistic and unable to be upheld due to bias, prejudice- either conscious or subconscious, and stereotyping. Initially, bias is using personal experiences to hold strong emotions toward a variety of groups of people. Bias can affect the court system in countless ways. For example, an individual may connect to the person on trial by race, gender, ethnicity or commonality between

there is no hearing. Both the defense attorney and the prosecutor will give their opening statements. After that, they will give their opening statements. Finally, they will present their evidence, etc. Our court system is very similar to Earth. Almost identical. Are there

Introduction The courts have many different functions, such as resolving disputes, reviewing and passing laws, as well as decision making. In this paper I will be arguing the points of why family courts should be the last thought when going through a divorce involving children and their psychological well-being in the stages of a child to an adult. Family Court, just like any other court has the job of figuring out whether a breach of legal right has taken place and what verdict would be right for

filed in opposition to him or her, courts set bail to make an effort to ensure the person charged may show up in the court for upcoming hearings. A bail is the amount of money the defendant has to deposit along with the courtroom to secure her or his freedom while the defendant 's case is being heard from the court. When the defendant will not pay the bond set by the judge, the defendant goes to jail until the court hears his or her case. In certain cases, the court may not actually make bail arrangements

I had the opportunity to visit a Kankakee County Domestic Violence Court on February 24, 2016. The purpose of this assignment was to challenge me to think about social justice, oppression, and discrimination related to individuals and families as well as social service providers in the court system. The purpose of the Domestic Violence Court was designed to improve the safety of victims and their families through related family issues, such as custody, visitation, civil protection orders, divorce

requiring an individual to appear in court and to give testimony or to bring material to be used as evidence. Some subpoenas mandate that book, papers, and other items be surrendered to the court" (Schmalleger 301). A court, Grand Jury, legislative body, or Administrative Agency uses a subpoena to compel an individual to appear before it at a specific time to give testimony. An individual who receives a subpoena but fails to appear may be charged with contempt of court and subjected to civil or criminal

In the Criminal Justice system and in particular trial courts, witnesses` give testimony when taking the stand. There are several types of witnesses`, Lay witness, Expert witness, and Law Enforcement witness. Witnesses’ give an account or testimony of the facts and issues in a trial (findlaw.com). An ordinary witness in a criminal court case is referred to as a “Lay Witness”. A Lay witness has first-hand knowledge about matters relevant to the case and their testimony, and or opinion is subject

States court system there are three levels of justice: district courts, circuit courts that handle the first level of appeals, and the Supreme court of the United States which is the final level in the federal court system. In the United States there are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme court in the entire country. There are both federal and state courts that work separately from each other. The primary difference is when it comes to civil cases; the federal courts are courts

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today the prosecution intends to convict the defendant, Samuel Sheppard, with the heinous crime of murder in the second degree. Sheppard’s long-standing torrid affair with nurse Susan Hayes serves as his motive. On the fateful night of July 4, 1954, the defendant brutally bludgeoned his loving wife, Marilyn Sheppard, to death, after flying into a fit of rage over what would be the last of their many fights over his infidelity. Marilyn Sheppard was only 31, and four

Part I – Overview of Canadian Court System In the Canadian court system there are four levels of court. The first level is the provincial or territorial courts, which handle the majority of cases that come through the court system. The second level of court is the provincial or territorial superior courts. These courts deal with more serious criminalities and also take appeals from provincial or territorial court judgments. The federal court deals with different issues, but is on the same level

The first drug court was established in Miami-Dade, Florida in 1989. Drug courts were established because of the “revolving door of drug use” and increasing recidivism rates. Drug courts have the ability to change a person’s life for the better by teaching them how to beat their addictions while providing the proper treatments for each offender. As a result, of the ongoing development of drug courts it is unfair to expect the system to be indefectible. Still, there are many benefits in participating

Did the district court have the jurisdiction to interfere in the city’s discretionary action? This court reverses the trial court’s judgment; the trial court has no jurisdiction to interfere in the lawful discretionary act of local public officials. The trial court has limited authority to implement its judgment over a discretionary act of the city officials, unless it reviews a crime or a violation of legal compliance. The trial court also does not have the authority to specify, how a local government