High-stakes testing Essays

Testing and schools go hand in hand, and they generally have a positive impact. High stakes testing has become vital for public schools; consequently, high-stakes testing has risen and spread like a bad case of the flu.[PP3] High stakes testing is detrimental to American education due to the accountability, course favoritism, and negative attitude it brings to school systems. A major creditor to the evolution of high stakes testing is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was enacted

use existing international and Australian literature on student’s experience of high stakes testing to support their research to answer the question ‘is high-stakes testing in the best interest of students?’ The reoccurring theme throughout the review is the negative impact that high-stakes testing has on the health and wellbeing of students. The review draws attention to existing research that suggests high-stakes testing lowers the self esteem, self image and long term confidence of students, causing

These kids may not be able to get into a university as they lacked the crucial help and resources to not only pass the test but score as high as the students who have the edge to prepare better. My question is why are American school systems are relying so much on one test to defy a student’s grade or future? Studies have shown that high stake testing like the SAT’s, have cut down on different ethnicities getting into colleges. According an article written by Rebecca Zwick, At the

I agree high stakes testing has an impact how we teach our curriculum, even in the military environment. We use high stakes testing for promotion to the next pay grade in our enlisted ranks. As educators, our primary goal should be developing curriculum and assessment procedures that improve learning outcomes for our students instead of deterring them. Test like high-stakes actual deters student learning. Amrein & Berliner (2002) suggest, the No Child Left Behind Act high stakes testing policy has

From a student and teacher standpoint, I think that there is way too much emphasis on high stakes testing. All year you hear teachers say “You’re going to need to know this when you take the FSA”. It is insane how much you hear about these types of test, even at the beginning of the school year. Another bad thing about high stakes testing is that teachers only worry about these forms of test. Throughout the year, teachers forget about teaching the material and worry about teaching to the test.

High-stakes testing is a form of testing that came about after the No Child Left Behind Act, or NCLB. High stakes tests are defined as the summative test or assessment designed to measure student achievement to make decisions that are of prominent educational, financial or social impact. (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2013) The concept of high stakes test is to determine and account for several factors such as whether a student will be promoted to the next grade or if a student will receive a high school

Discussion Post- Chapter 7- High stakes testing Claim: High stakes testing is an extremely problematic political issue within the education system because it holds all students to the same standards regardless of disabilities or disadvantages, it encourages educators to teach strictly on information that relates to the tests, and it can have major consequences for schools across the country that are unable to make Adequete Yearly Progress (AYP). Evidence: The Learning to Teach Edition Nine textbook

some form of high stakes testing for many years, the SAT, ACT, AP, and so on. Testing in this form was used to measure how much a student had learned and retained over the course of a student’s education. However, over time the testing focus changed. High stakes testing morphed from a useful tool that gauges achievement to becoming the primary focus in education. The focus is no longer about what the child has achieved, instead the emphasis is on achieving top scores. High stakes testing effects education

High-stakes testing is something most people have experienced; however, the stigma around the testing has changed drastically within the last twenty years. Becoming more popular with the push to become smarter as a nation, high-stakes testing has become a kind of epidemic across the land. High stakes testing is detrimental to the future of United States education due to how it has become all-encompassing in schools, how accountable it makes a single test, and how the actual effects stray from the

Association (AEA) in taking a strong stance on the deleterious effects of high stakes testing, especially going so far as to promulgate their reasons and concerns. It is obvious from the statement that the AEA supports the importance of testing and accountability in improving education, but finds the current testing manipulation environment to be harmful for any positive improvements in education. Specifically, how the monolithic testing focus has increased dropout rates, created cultural insensitivity,

I believe this article in asking the question; Are High-Stakes Tests punishing some students is a valid issue. A high percentage of students who are failing these standardized tests are from poor, low-income, ethnic, racial minority and special education students. Here are some specific tests and results. The ACLU of Massachusetts states the testing gap punishes the poor, and ethnic minority the most. There is a testing gap between rich and poor communities. About 65 percent of students in low-income

of High-Stakes Testing Towards Students' Skills and Mental Health High-stakes testing has become a widely used method to assess students' skills and compare their academic abilities. These tests refer to assessments or exams that have significant consequences for students in educational systems. These tests typically carry high stakes because they heavily influence important decisions, such as student promotion, graduation, college admissions, or school funding. Although high-stakes testing provides

I have a hard time seeing the value in high-stakes testing, although they may contribute data and performance levels, I think it’s hard to say whether or not the data is reliable. The first thing I think of when it comes to testing is how detrimental it can be for students. For a majority of students who may struggle in school, or are bad test takers, testing can greatly effect their self esteem. I also think testing takes away from the fun of school, teachers are and sort of have to spend more

is aligned to meet high-stake testing requirements. The National Education Association reported 72% of teacher felt “moderate” or “extreme” pressure from schools and their district to better student test score in order to get funding from the federal government (Barth, 2006). Therefore, this indicates that the teacher has little or no influence on what their student loan, as a result, this has impacted the classroom learning environment negatively. Moreover, high stake testing has force teachers

\Cizek, (2022), argues that high stakes testing has led to a "cultural shift in education, from a focus on teaching and learning to a focus on testing and accountability". He suggests that this shift has been detrimental to both teachers and students, as it has reduced the flexibility and creativity of instruction and led to a greater emphasis on rote memorization. Researcher reported that an assessment method that is used to make important decisions about students, teachers, and schools. They indicated

which schools and teachers are effectively doing their job. Alternatively, low-stakes tests are used to measure academic achievement and adjust teaching/learning practices. The difference between high and low stakes testing is not the type of test itself, rather the impact of the results. For students, high-stakes testing can be used to determine whether they can move on to the next grade level. For schools, high-stakes tests can have an impact on decisions for penalties, like negative ratings, staff

With the increasing demands of high stakes testing and teacher accountability, elementary school leaders are continuously examining the curriculum, best practices, technology, assessment tools and assessments outcomes to help enhance student achievement. During this course, we have discussed several scholars that investigated and implemented various theories of curriculum instructional practices. There was Franklin Bobbitt, Boyd Bode, William H. Kilpatrick, Jean Piaget, B.F. Skinner and Ralph Tyler

High-stakes testing is a topic that fosters a lot of passionate opinions. The intended reasons for high-stakes testing is that it measures learning, and holds schools accountable. (Cordogan, 37) There are many advantages and disadvantages of high-stakes. Also, there are many options for change of standardized tests. For example, decrease in importance of high-stakes and use diverse strategies. Most of the disadvantages of it effects the school, teachers, and students as a whole not just individually

Part I: High-stakes student testing has challenged many states, districts, and schools across the nation. In some states, students do not advance to the next grade level or receive diplomas without passing standardized tests. What are the validity and reliability issues? What are the consequences of using the scores for making such decisions? The validity concerns with standardized test are that it can be “valid in one situation and invalid in another” (McMillan & Schumacher, 2010, p. 173). In order

not need to be high-stakes tests, time-limited tests, or multiple-choice tests. the questions can be simple or complex. the subject matter among school-age students is frequently academic skills, but a standardized test can be given on nearly any topic, including driving tests, creativity, personality,