ipl-logo

4th Amendment Case Study

829 Words4 Pages

Per this rule, the issue is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. David Riley was driving with expired tags when he was arrested. The police impounded the car when they realized that his license was suspended. Policy states that when a car is impounded, an inventory search must be conducted. He was arrested for possession of loaded firearms. The officer seized a smartphone from his pants. The record is not clear as to what the officers did with this cell phone, but there is no doubt that an officer went through the text messages. Later on a detective that specialized in gang investigations also searched the phone at the police station. This detective not only went through text messages, but also pictures and videos. Based on what was found, …show more content…

Diaz that the police are not required to have a warrant in order to search the information on someone’s phone at the time of their arrest. In this case checking Diaz’s phone was lawful because it occurred during a search incident to arrest. A search incident to a lawful arrest allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person in the interest of officer safety, destruction of evidence and prevention of escape. Based on this ruling, the digital contents of a cell phone do not threaten the safety of police officers. It makes sense for officers to secure the phone to make sure there is no potential harm, but data on the phone cannot harm anybody. There where no exigent circumstances in Mr. Riley’s case to search his cell phone. Evidence stored on a phone can be destroyed remotely. If individuals were anticipating their arrest, they could have their phone’s data wiped completely. Police officers might choose to go through the phone right then and there to make sure that evidence can’t be destroyed, but this is not the only option. Remote wiping can be prevented. Officers can just turn off the phone or remove its battery. Another option is placing the phone in an enclosure that isolates it from radio

Show More
Related

  • The Fourth Amendment: The Most Important

    117 Words  | 1 Pages

    The First Amendment is the most important, because of freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Many people think that the fourth amendment is the most important. They think this, because it is important for a person to be able to tell policemen “No” if they ask you if they could search your car or your house. I believe that the fourth amendment is really important, but you wouldn’t be able to tell the policemen “No” if you didn’t have freedom of speech. George Washington said,”If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be, like sheep to the slaughter” (“Famous Quotes Freedom of Speech”).Without freedom of speech and religion we are nothing.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case: Riley Vs. California

    1346 Words  | 6 Pages

    The writ questioned “Whether or under what circumstances the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to conduct a warrantless search of the digital contents of an individual’s cell phone seized from the person at the time of arrest”, SCOTUSblog.com; and it was granted on January 17, 2014 in part because Federal and State Courts had openly divided opinions over this issue. Riley v. California was argued on April 29, 2014 and a decision was made on June 25, 2014. The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. declared by a unanimous decision that a warrantless cell phone search violates the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. The court stated that the warrantless search exception (SITA) does not apply to this case because digital data store in an electronic device cannot be used as a weapon to harm officers. Although, the court recognizes that possible evidence stored on a cell phone may be wiped remotely, it also acknowledges that it could be avoided by disconnecting the cell phone from the network and placing it in a Faraday bag.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Case Of Sam Wardlow

    899 Words  | 4 Pages

    But, that was not the case and the officers did pursue sam without probable cause. Evidence that was founded by taking an individual’s rights is illegal and cannot be used in

    Read More

  • Wendell Clayton Case Study

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    In addition to that, this goes to show that anyone in an area with a possible threat to public safety can be stopped to search even if they don’t have anything to do with the crime or weren’t described as a suspect. Furthermore this case is a great example of how

    Read More

  • Arnie's Confidentiality Policy

    2313 Words  | 10 Pages

    Because technology is continually growing, new laws are being passed regarding technology and confidentiality. This article questions the “invasive” internet searches and looks for a constitutional answer. As of now, no electronic device can be confiscated and searched without a warrant. This could prove to be beneficial for Arnie. If he was to report Mr. Bowen’s suspicious data to the police, they would be able to obtain a warrant to officially search Mr. Bowen’s computer.

    Read More

  • District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Study

    942 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is simply not the case in the search of digital media because the evidence is not tangible and serves no immediate threat to the officer. Also, “faraday bags” exist to store the evidence until a warrant is obtained and the phone can be disconnected from any network and turned off until that warrant is obtained. The supreme court has, in previous cases, established that cell phones are “minicomputers filled with massive amounts of private information” and this served the purpose of differentiating them from traditional items that can be searched immediately following arrest such as a wallet. But the court held that in the event that it was crucial to governmental interests, a warrantless search of a cell phone could be executed. Another prominent concurring opinion was sponsored by conservative Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. who stated that although he doubts that warrantless searches are truly justifiably for the protection of officers and preservation of evidence the court’s majority opinion is the best one in the given circumstances.

    Read More

  • How Do Phone Snooping Violate The 4th Amendment

    248 Words  | 1 Pages

    A phone with bank information can be a top prize for a treacherous police officer. They can go to your home, text contacts, even steal identities if you put enough information on alleged “secure” personal devices. Phone snooping violates the 4th amendment, which says "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”. When Gregory Diaz, a California resident who was seen participating a drug deal, was ordered to hand over his phone to an officer without a warrant, it violated the amendment. The Supreme Court, when notified about the case, decided that Diaz’s case was an exception to the 200 y/o rule.

    Read More

  • Riley Vs California Research Paper

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    Roberts. The Court’s decision was a unanimous 9-0 in favor of David Riley (Oyez, “Riley v. California”). This means that there was no dissenting opinion because the all the judges voted the same. In the judges statement says that it is unnecessary to search the phone right away because it can just be held until a proper warrant is obtained. The judges also claimed that because of the “Cloud” most of the information that would be searched is not technically in physical possession of the person.(Oyez, “Riley v. California”).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Stingray In The United States

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    The judge in the specific Milwaukee case stated that “A person wanted on probable cause (and an arrest warrant) who is taken into custody in a public place where he had no legitimate expectation of privacy cannot complain about how the police learned his location” This argument doesn’t make much sense if you change it to be about something other than a phone. If the police searched the man’s house without a warrant in order to learn his location, then in court any evidence that they obtained within the house would be thrown out. The judge is pretty much

    Read More

  • Dk Dbq Analysis

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    These actions did not go by what was established by an earlier, similar case, and by performing the scan with no warrant, the government did not allow DLK to conduct private activities in his own home. Although some argue that the government’s actions were acceptable because they only scanned what was visible to the public, they still used a device not readily available to the public to see inside DLK’s home. The government’s actions were unacceptable, and a warrant should have been obtained prior to performing the search in order to make it

    Read More

  • Why The Fourth Amendment Requires A Probable Cause For Arrest

    164 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment requires a probable cause for arrest. Substantially, particular things are needed to legally conduct a search or seizure. This incorporates arrest, so a search, a seizure, or an arrest cannot take place without reason. Not to mention, there must be a "court order" for Apple to give the government "customer data." So, since a “court order” must be in place for Apple to give the government “customer data,” that “court order” would have to also take place for an arrest that could conceivably follow.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cell phone can unveil information within our call history, text messages, pictures, and even internet searches. Access to our cell phones is like access to our lives. No matter how much time passes, the fourth amendment continues to

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment Scenarios

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures (Hall, 2014). In the scenario, it is important to remember that the employer is a government entity and the Fourth Amendment was originally designed to limit government authority as it applies to unreasonable searches and seizures (Hall, 2014). You would not be able to make a strong argument that the government violated the Fourth Amendment in this scenario. The property, whether it is a laptop, cell phone, or tablet, belongs to the government. Government entities have policies that employees must read and sign specifically acknowledging there is no expectation of privacy on these devices owned by the government.

    Read More

  • Skepticism Prevails Between Lawmakers And FBI In The Encryption

    858 Words  | 4 Pages

    But the law is outdated and does not cover modern devices and online communication. Are Apple and Google willing to let bad guys walk away just like that? Certainly, that is what the latest default encryption means to the FBI. By locking out the phone for police, what do the tech giants aim to achieve in law and order? Comney further added.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Essay On 1984 By George Orwell

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    That's my tracker,” by Peter Maass and Megha Rajagopalan they talk about how every personal information that a citizen has safe on their phone is not safe and that their phones are in danger. In the article, they mention how “1.3 million of call data was collected”. Millions of cell phone users have been swept up in government surveillance of their calls. That proves that cell phone companies have definitely been watching our every move and how our phones have obviously become like our personal trackers. In the article, they also mention how “Cellular systems constantly check and record the location of all phones on their networks – and this data is particularly treasured by police departments and online advertisers” this obviously shows that the government is able to obtain private information from citizens.

    Read More

More about 4th Amendment Case Study

Open Document