“Thirty years ago, prosecution seemed deemed to take my life from me. They didn’t just take me from my family and friends. They had every intention of prosecuting me for something I didn’t do.” –Anthony Ray Hinton. On October 12, 2016 I attended a speech by Anthony Ray Hinton at the Johnson Fine Arts Center on Northern State University’s Campus in Aberdeen, SD. Anthony Hinton spoke to us about his time on death row, and the events leading up to arrest, conviction, and being exonerated. He was there to inform us on his experience and the injustice that can come with the death penalty. This eventually leads to him trying to persuade the audience to take action to get rid of the death penalty. As a strong believer of the death penalty, Hinton’s …show more content…
At the beginning of his speech, he had a video presentation that had been done hours after he was exonerated, and it gave a slight look into what had happened to him. This set up his actual speech in a way where you wanted to listen to what he was going to talk about, and made you curious about what had happened to this poor man. After this, he began his actual speech. Hinton’s attention getter was as follows, “I wish I could stand here tonight and tell you that race is not an issue in the justice system. I wish I could tell you that the state of Alabama realized their mistake. However, I would be lying if I said anything of these things.” This grabbed my attention because it makes you wonder what happened again, and in addition it was the way he said it. Hinton is a large black man with a deep voice and a thick southern drawl, and when he talks, it demands attention but it’s not intimidating, this was also an attention grabber for me. His introduction was about setting up the scene of his arrest. He talked about his mother in a way that made you want her to be your mother, what he was doing and how the arrest didn’t make any sense in the first place. One thing he said at the end of his introduction, which led into what I would consider the body, that will stick with me is this, “One of the white men that came to carry me to jail said, “Oh I don't care if you did it or didn't do it, you're gonna pay the price for …show more content…
I learned a lot about the justice system in America, and what can happen to somebody who is wrongly convicted. Hinton truly made me question my belief in the death penalty when he spoke. He also taught me that when giving a public speech, it’s okay to let your emotions overcome you sometimes and to make people laugh, or ask them to question their beliefs. If I could give Hinton some suggestions, it would be to better organize the body portion of the speech. This is due to the fact that it was hard to differentiate points sometimes and follow what was going on. Hinton did an amazing job of keeping my attention the whole time. This speech was well over an hour long, and not once did I day dream about when I got to leave, or when this would be over. He captivated me the whole time during his speech. I am extremely happy I got the chance to attend this speech and I couldn’t have asked for a better one to
Several of people ended up being so moved and captivated by the speech, because after he finished talking you could tell he was passionate about the situation and actually
Equality means every individual has equal opportunities. Historically, certain groups of people, African Americans, have been denied of their rights as Americans. The Voting Rights of 1965, a law passed, elimated literacy test that restricted African Americans from voting. In Lydon B. Johnson speech ¨ The American Promise¨ ,Johnson is making an effort to have equality among white and black in society.
He had a smile on the entire time and made sure to emphasize his passion for this subject. His posture was good but at certain parts throughout the speech you can see him start to slouch, making it slightly less professional, but overall it was good. His expressions were very animated but not over the top, just watching his face you could tell the way he felt about each thing he spoke on, I think this was also one of the best parts of his speech. As
The United States remains in the minority of nations in the world that still uses death as penalty for certain crimes. Capital punishment is seen by many as barbaric and against American values, while others see it as a very important tool in fighting violent pre-meditated murder. One of the supporters of the Death penalty was a man named Walter Berns (a professor of American constitutional law and political philosophy.) He wrote clearly about his view on the death penalty in his Crime and Delinquency article, “Defending the Death Penalty.” He argued that the “Opposition to capital punishment is a modern phenomenon, a product of modern sentiment and modern thought” (p. 504) and with the help of historical references and logical reasoning throughout
We have all heard of the saying “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” Patrick Hannon was ordered to be executed on November 8th by a lethal injection after Governor Scott signed his death warrant for a murder scene in 1991. On Patrick’s day of execution, I attended his vigil at the Florida State Prison in Starke with the Gainesville Citizens for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. At the Vigil, I met two of Patrick’s Pen Pals and heard great things about him. From that moment, I realized that our past does not define who we are.
Jenny Cromie and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from “The Death Penalty Isn’t the Answer to Crime Woes.”
Given that he spoke for the American people, he implies that as a nation, we have had to make some difficult choices, but, yet we make those decisions with courage and determination that keeps us united. This is one of the many points that highlights his speech. Giving positive and strong statements adds strength to his speech which keeps his audience occupied with his words. Hence, it is very important that audience is listening and comprehending what is being
He started off with a promise. Not a direct one, but one that gave me a sense of hope for the future. There he was, a white man, stating that his convictions towards black discrimination will not falter, and that he believed in his heart of hearts that
He successfully uses the three rhetorical appeals, allegory, and repetition to get his point across. His speech definitely shows the South it could be capable of amazing success, if the Whites and the African American realize they need each
The essay, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life”, written by Edward I. Koch is written to persuade the reader to accept the favor of the death penalty. The writer not only states a variety of facts, but he also tries to generate sorrow or even anger at times. He expresses different topics that lead to these emotions throughout the text by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Koch was successful at making the reader favor the death penalty not only because he used these techniques, but he also kept the reading concise. Another solid reasoning that Edward I. Koch uses that mixes with the internal emotions is pathos.
He explains that people of his race are feeling trapped because of their situation and speaking up means they “interfere with life and disrupt white mainstream”(19). The “wall less prison” is described by the experiences that America Americans have had such as “lousy schools, drug use and abuse, being the victims of crimes, lack of employment, economic despair” (19). All of these factors contributed to the issues that the African American community has faced and has also impacted families. Black parents feel they must describe their children as “what they are not, rather than what they are” (19).
This speech is also not effective to me because his speech was hard to understand and it did not keep my attention. It was not direct to the point and it didn’t use a typical everyday vocabulary an 8th grader would use . But, if I were an older person I would maybe, reconsider saying it was too hard to understand . Another negative about his speech was that many people weren’t coming together to make the constitution better .
By utilizing a varying sentence structure, McKnight is able to shape tet text into almost command-like statements, declaring the importance of each and every word. This technique portrays the somewhat negative mood of the short story but also highlights the first matter at hand, racism. Integrating parataxis at the opening of the story lets McKnight arrange fragments that play off of each other and also be direct and declarative; additionally, the transparent nature of this emphasizes that McKnight is not going to beat around the bush about the important subject of race that he expands upon with this piece of literature. Even just in the introduction, there is a clear statement that racism exists is made by using the terms “black” and “white” in a stereotyping
Roosevelt does not try to be aggressive in his speech and offers people to think about his proposal. He gives proofs why people should be in politics and accompanied with appropriate
Did they have a PREVIEW? Do they use any CITATIONS? What were the MAIN POINTS in the speech? HOW was the speaker’s CONCLUSION EFFECTIVE or not?