“You can't judge an album by a single song; it's like judging a book by only reading a single chapter” Trevor Rabin. Although the short stories Cathedral and A Rose for Emily have completely different plots, they both have morals that are described in this quote. Cathedral follows around a blind man named Robert visiting an old friend and her husband, who does not care for the Robert. A Rose for Emily is about Emily, a woman who is perceived as a local oddity but soon the townspeople realize she is not just odd, but also a little bit crazy. Both Emily from the short story, A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner, and Robert from Cathedral by Raymond Carver, portray characters that become of the targets of premature assumptions, but when the …show more content…
Both Emily and Robert are prematurely judged by the narrators in both stories, and the assumptions are so far fetched from the reality. Miss. Emily is perceived to be a lonely old woman, whom nobody ever spoke with. Since they never talk with her or learn anything about what is going on in her life, the townspeople begin to gossip to make up for this. They knew her father had driven away any man from becoming close to her, and they just thought to themselves, “ poor Emily” (32). The townspeople never consider her to be a crazy woman, not even when she claimed her father wasn't dead, and kept the body in her house. They all make up excuses for Emily because they felt sympathy for her, and they kept on just saying poor Emily. The narrator in The Cathedral did not want anything to do with Robert because he was a blind man. He thought they would not have anything to bond over anything, and all he knew about him was what his wife told him. The narrator assumes he has a long cane, dark sunglasses, and is a quiet man whom he would …show more content…
Emily, their opinions on each person drastically change. Robert and the narrator learn that they have somethings in common, such as both liking to drink scotch. The narrator finally begins to open his eyes and see Robert as a human being, and this is sparked when they all eat dinner together. While they were all eating dinner , the narrator said, “I watched with admiration as he used his fork and knife on the meat” (98). The narrator expects for Robert to be a sloppy eater, constantly using his fingers to eat because of his blindness, but he is dumbstruck that Robert eats like a normal person. He realizes how smart Robert is, and he keeps being shocked as the night goes on. While listening to a show about Cathedrals, Robert asks the narrator to describe him a Cathedral. The narrator tries his hardest, but can not do it. To combat this, Robert takes the narrator's hand and has him close his eyes and together they draw the church just from memory. After drawing the Cathedrals, the narrator describes the picture as, “ It’s really something” (103).He learns how seeing is not everything in life, and how wrong he was with his assumptions about Robert. The narrator finally understands how Robert can love a woman or even just eat dinner being blind, since looking is not as important as he once thought. The townspeople were also just as wrong about Miss. Emily. When Emily dies, the townspeople are let into
While many Christians may blanch at the alcohol drinking and pot smoking portrayed in Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral”, the blind man, Robert, actually bears a strong resemblance to the Christian messiah. Robert may not have a halachic education or brown sandals on his feet, but he does have a brown beard and many similarities to Jesus that mark him as a Christ figure. In Carver’s “Cathedral”, Robert serves as a modern day Christ figure, bringing enlightenment to the people he encounters. Jesus is famous for being a messiah in a time that did not welcome him; he was an outsider and one who was perceived to be a threat to the society of his time. Robert is also on the fringe of society on account of his blindness.
While the narrator feels regret for not being able to raise her daughter right, she understands that mistakes will be made and her children can still grow up to be okay in the world. While Emily learns from her past and works towards a new future, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a perfect child. In realizing that the narrator and Emily are very similar in their personalities as well as their young adult struggles, it is important to lean on family members for support in times of
The narrator in “ Cathedral” has the characteristics of a white sheltered man, who lives in the beginning of the 80’s. He is the reflection of Archie Bunker, from the hit show, All in the Family. The narrator lives in the sub-burbs of Connecticut, where his ignorance, is able to blossom. Where his way of thinking is universal. The narrator has a lot of biases views of people, especially of the blind.
Robert is a lenient and easygoing person. Even though the narrator shows his unpleasant feelings about his visit, Robert turned the contradiction to ease at last. Initially, Robert is a mysterious person to the narrator; the narrator has no idea about a blind man, and he has been lurking in the background of his wife’s life. He also touched his wife’s face when she worked for him at the past. After that, Robert married the next woman who worked for him.
The husband’s mindset has impaired his ability to see Robert as anything other than handicapped. His discomfort is shown again once the three of them finish dinner. He says that his wife sat with Robert on the couch and that they had “two or three more drinks while they talked about the major things that had come to pass for them in the past ten years. For the most part, I just listened.
A Mistry of Emily’s Life. In the story “A Rose for Emily”, the author William Faulkner tells about a mysterious small, fat woman Emily Grierson. After her father past away and her sweetheart is gone, Emily has a mental breakdown and is entirely cut off from the outside world; people hardly see her at all. The whole town is very curious to see the inside of her house, to penetrate Emily’s world and exchange a few words with the Negro who is her cook and gardener.
The narrator’s discomfort around the man begins when the narrator first ask Robert, “Which side of the train did yous sit on” (89).This question is rather irrelevant because Robert can not see the scenery from either side of the train, so the narrator’s action immediately shows he is uncomfortable around Robert because he is blind. By the narrator asking Robert a question that he is incapable of answering, one can see how he shows no sense of boundaries upon others. Another time the narrator’s discomfort takes over is when he says, “We had us two or three more drinks while they talked about the major things that had come to pass for them in the past ten years. For the most part, I just listened. Now and then I joined in"(91).
The unknown narrator captures ever single important detail of Emily's life as if he was her secret admirer. Years past and he continues to know what is occurring in her life. I Realized that the narrator is a male character when he stated " So when she got to be thirty and was still single, we were not pleased exactly(630). Throughout the story, he explains the negative comments from the townspeople. Your brought into the scenery of her life behind the view of others.
The narrator begins to change as Robert taught him to see beyond the surface of looking. The narrator feels enlightened and opens up to a new world of vision and imagination. This brief experience has a long lasting effect on the narrator. Being able to shut out everything around us allows an individual the ability to become focused on their relationships, intrapersonal well-being, and
Emily is judged for loving a man who is less fortunate than her . In the following line the townspeople’s reactions to their relationship is obvious, “’Poor Emily’, the whispering began. ‘Do you suppose it’s really so?’ they said to one another” (102). The townspeople did not to much care for the relationship between the two because of the barriers set up by social class saying poor date the poor and rich date the rich.
Emily Grierson was an old, overweight woman often dressed in black. The author describes her body as being as if it was “long submerged in motionless water” (1), her eyes “alike two small pieces of coal” (1). It is blatant that the woman is unhealthy and damaged, falling behind in the way that she lives. The life and times of the surrounding people are moving forward, while she is stuck living in the past, leading the reader to better understand the relationship she once had with her late father. All of these factors of setting help to make things clear about the mental state in which the woman was in, and it is most clear when it is made a point with no surprise that Emily was in fact not always alone, as she had been sleeping beside
He sees that what he thought about Robert's life was not at all what it was. Sometimes our lives are built on what we see and how we think others people see us. He learns that Robert sees and communicates by seeing in his mind not with his eyes. As both were watching television Robert ask the narrator to tell him what a cathedral looks like. The narrator couldn’t imagine how he was going to describe what a cathedral looked like.
The mental instability and Emily’s delusions, and her losing touch with the reality of her time result in her desire and action of necrophilia. So, Miss Emily killed her lover and sleeps in bed next his corpse every night to satisfy her dream need. Additionally, in the super-ego or “over the self,” Emily is always fighting to achieve what is socially correct and morally
As for Udolpho, rampart is a place connected with mysterious events: the figure came opposite to her casement. . . she had not heard even a footfall; and the solemnity of this silence, with the mysterious form she saw, subdued her spirits . . . she observed the figure start away, and glide down the rampart . . . scarcely doubting that she had witnessed a supernatural appearance. At Château-le-Blanc, the supernatural is concentrated in the rooms of a suddenly deceased former lady.
I feel that the narrator is on par with us as readers. It would seem that the narrator has no direct access to Emily's private life, he seems to depend on the few public appearances, and rumors. Often, one does not know if the narrator has been watching the narrated himself, or if he is retelling the story by means of the talk of the people that lived around Emily. If the chatter of the old in the city is a major source of narration, then the leaps in time become in a way more understandable. Gossip often comes with the price of untruth lying at its core, everyone having their own version of events, and embellishment often taking over the actual