A journalist by the name of Jon Krakauer wrote the book “Into The Wild”.He used this piece of literature to persuade to the audience that McCandless is inspiring and courageous role model.Going out into the world showed how others can connect to Mccandless and it would withhold judgment.An inspiring person is someone who shows others the urge or ability to do or feel something that may be creative,risk taking and or challenging.Krakauer is proving how McCandlesses adventurous actions proves he had a lot of courage meaning he was not deterred by danger or pain.Krakauer also had his own empathy for McCandless as a fellow explorer. Krakauers used McCandlesses adventures to reveal his courage.McCandless spent two years testing his theory
“Into the Wild” – Persuasive Essay What is your thoughts about Chris McCandless? Was he brave, or was he just another foolish person? The book “Into the Wild” written by Jon Krakauer was a book describing the life and death of an adventurer known as Chris McCandless. The answer to the question I asked earlier is simple. McCandless is neither wise nor foolish, for he has both qualities.
This book starts with the founding of Christopher McCandless’s body by a bunch of Alaskan hunters in a bus. The law enforcement then comes to remove his body. Jon Krakauer writes about this while writing for “Outside Magazine” and become very curious about this story. To find out more Krakauer pays a visit to a man named Wayne Westerberg, who says that he knew Christopher McCandless as “Alex McCandless” and he then gives a sketch of the young man’s character while in Carthage Wisconsin. He states that he used McCandless from time to time on his grain elevator and from his memories views him as participating, smart, and determined.
Krakauer was instead the author and detective for Into The Wild interviewing each person Chris had crossed paths with and left an impact. This long process gave Krakauer a new insight into why Chris had gone to Alaska. In the end ,although not living, Chris affected Krakauer by giving him a new outlook on the transcendentalist way of life and why it was so appealing to him. Krakauer felt closer to Chris than many of those that actually crossed his path. He had a similar experience when he was younger going out on his own and scaling the “Devils Thumb” in Alaska.
The need to be separated from the society that oppressed him. Throughout the years since Krakauer’s publication, people have both condemned and praised McCandless for his actions. One individual, Shaun Callarman, claims that McCandless was
In Krakauer’s non-fiction novel Into The Wild, he tells the story of a young man named Chris McCandless and his crazy adventures all over North America. Chirs McCandless was a 22-year-old, who had just graduated from Emory University and decided to go off on this journey. Throughout the novel, Krakauer follows the trail that took, he meets with many different people who had interacted with McCandless and they tell him their stories. Krakauer also tells the stories of four other men who set out on similar adventures. The men who stuck out to me were Gene Rosellini and Evertt Ruess, two men with similar plans to those of McCandless.
While Krakauer admits to holding a personal bias towards McCandless’s life and story, his statements about McCandless’s emotions and reasoning stems directly from
He was a person who followed his natural calling and acted on his beliefs. McCandless is often compared to Everett Ruess--a solo traveler like Chris-- who “went out and did the things he dreamed about” (90). Men like McCandless and Ruess are motivating because they actually had the courage to break away from the norms of society and do what it takes to become truly self-reliant. McCandless knew that when he graduated college that he needed to find time and a safe place to understand himself. As an experienced traveler himself, Krakauer described the trek into the wild as, “ a trancelike state settles over your efforts; the climb becomes a clear-eyed dream.
The life of Chris Mccandless as shown in “Into the Wild” by John Krakauer reflects off of the ideas of courage and nobility through his interactions with society, philosophies on life, and his pursuit to fully achieve his goal. Throughout Mccandless’ journey he encountered many people in which he inspired. No matter how long the visit was with each stranger he always “made an indelible impression on a number of people” (Pg. 48). Mccandless has even left such a huge impact on people that they completely change their lifestyle.
To conclude, Krakauer uses three valuable techniques to capture the meaning behind Into the Wild and McCandless’s journey itself: narrative structure, epigraphs, and tone. Chris McCandless was an intelligent young man who sought adventure far from his dull stable life. He essentially went off the grid to capture what he wished for the most, which was ultimate freedom and happiness. It was like a tag on a shirt that keeps bothering the tenderness of one’s skin. It was the reason why the tag was ripped off.
Krakauer decided to return from his journey, concluding that no matter how badly someone may want something, there are goals that are impossible to reach. McCandless was possibly on this vision quest not because he wanted people to notice him, but to find his true self. It is possible that although it seemed like McCandless had such a good life, he felt that he was missing something on the inside. McCandless may have found out what he was missing just like Krakauer, but he may have found out too
“I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement and danger and the chance to sacrifice myself for my love. I felt in myself a superabundance of energy which found no outlet in our quiet life.” Leo Tolstoy “Family Happiness” Jon Krakauer in his nonfiction novel Into the wild, Krakauer depicts the life of Chris McCandless as he made his way into the Alaskan Bush.
Move on” to this response Krakauer defends himself by writing “because many people—both admirers of McCandless and his detractors—regard Into the Wild as a cautionary tale, it’s important to know as much as possible about how McCandless actually may have died.” The amount of determination of Jon Krakauer does make many critics and ordinary people question the mentally of the author however Krakauer could solve the mystery of McCandless’s
However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden
Into the Wild Christopher McCandless is a son of wealthy parents which were graduates from Emory University as a top student and athlete. Chris McCandless was seeking into the wilderness to show people he can really do it. Krakauer’s statement was proven to show his actions and support his courageous from living in the wilderness. McCandless wanted to walk to Alaska to start his journey on the hike. His adventure lasted 113 days in the wilderness which turned into something that shouldn’t have happened.
Based on a real story, Into the Wild can make us think from different perspectives about what the main character Christopher McCandless did. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a dramatic but also remarkable story from a young, newly graduated, college student that escaped for a long wild journey but never came back. As time passes throughout the book, the reader may notice how the main character interacts with society and nature, finally McCandless dies in the wild but even though he was struggling for survival he died happy. Some people never get out of their comfort zone, others are tired of it and retire from their comfort zone to have different experiences in life, some are good enough or some are terrible.