ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Cherokee

464 Words2 Pages

The white settlements expanded west, they threatened to take over Cherokee land in the southern U.S. The historical question is trying to tell if the Cherokee should leave or stay in their territory. People might disagree with this because the Cherokee’s do not want to leave their homes and want to stay to fight. People think they should stay because it’s their land and it should not be taken away from them and how they should stay to fight for their territory. The Cherokee have had this land for a while, since before they could remember. “We have taken care of this land respectfully. It contains the ashes of our father.” They have had the land for a long time, do not think they should just give it up. They respected this land, it contains the burials and ashes of their fathers. The CHerokee need to stay and fight for what they believe in because they need to show the government that they own this …show more content…

“We cannot agree to give it up for a far inferior land. If you take away our liberty and country, you will cause our nation to fall apart and be humiliated.” When protesting, the Cherokee want to keep their land. While the Cherokee are pushed away they are being humiliated. People will slow down or stop for the Cherokee’s ever becoming civilized and in learning the christian religion.
If the Cherokee leave and go to the land they are being forced to go to, they do not have any control over what happens next. “They will be ruled by laws that they did not help make and which they do not understand.” Boudinot is trying to say if the Cherokee leave they could be out ruled and forced to do things by the government all because the Cherokee are on new land owned by the U.S. If the Cherokee leave they will not know what is gonna happen to them all because the U.S. government wants their land. People should reject this because the Cherokee need to believe in themselves to fight for what is

Show More
Related

Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

413 Words | 2 Pages

In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

Read More

How Did Andrew Jackson Appear On The $ 20 Bill

1184 Words | 5 Pages

According to the textbook, it states, “The law did not say that the Indians should be removed by force, and... An angry Jackson disagreed. Groups that refused to move west voluntarily were met with

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson

1334 Words | 6 Pages

They hoped that by agreeing to the government’s terms they would get to keep some of their land, they could protect themselves from the whites, and they would be viewed as a more civilized nation. But their hopes were of no avail. Just like the other tribes, the Cherokee were forced to

Read More

Objections To Cherokee Settlers

174 Words | 1 Pages

The Cherokee had several major objections to moving to new locations. The Cherokee wanted to stay instead of moving to a place such as Arkansas because it is “unknown” to them and is already occupied by the Indians. Therefore, the Indians would look at the Cherokee as if they did not belong or be seen as an enemy when the Cherokee meant no harm. Also the Indians were not really supplied by wood and water, which was bad for the Indians because they could not live as agriculturalists, but also bad for the Cherokee because they were worried there was not a lot of land for farming. Furthermore, the Cherokee had major objections because the people around the Cherokees were so different compared to them.

Read More

How Did Indian Nations Resist Removal

821 Words | 4 Pages

The remaining Cherokee Indians were surrounded by the mast increasing majority of the whites. With the increasing of the white the population, the Cherokee were forced to adapt to the white man’s world and their way of life to blend in for survival. They created their own government, they became farmers, blacksmiths, carpenters, masons, owners of property. The Cherokees nation resisted removal using political means by publishing newspaper through the pressing press and protesting to the federal government; addressing memorial to the nation; a public plea for justice resulting in Georgia passing a law making it a crime for a white person to stay in Indian territory without taking an oath to the state of Georgia. The Cherokee Indians went through lawful and political means of resistance to avoid removal but it was ignored and their land was put on sale, property taken, and treaty created; still the Cherokee followed a policy of

Read More

Indian Removal Act

152 Words | 1 Pages

Our homeland taken away Betrayed so easily at the thought of gold By those we thought would never sway The Indian Removal Act became a well-known name Relocating us west from our Cherokee homeland However, they weren’t all the same Some supported, while others pitied

Read More

Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

1239 Words | 5 Pages

As their chief explains, "But if we are compelled to leave our country, we see nothing but ruin before us. The country west of the Arkansas territory is unknown to us...with whom we have lived in perfect peace for the last forty years…to bid adieu to our homes, our farms, our streams, and our beautiful forests? No... On the soil which contains the ashes of our beloved men we wish to live" (Document G). Speaking for all Indians, they never wanted to leave at all, it would only hinder the work they've made through 40 years of peace.

Read More

How Did The Us Use Native American Exceptionalism

434 Words | 2 Pages

According to “Blankets for the Dead” reading it states “ For more than a century, the Cherokees had watched first the colonies and then the United States chip away at their tribal territory. In treaty after treaty, they exchanged one more piece of land for one more promise of respect and coexistence.” This shows the trickery used by Americans towards the Natives, causing them to be forced out of land. Telling us how Americans agreed to be helpful towards Natives, just to later go on and betray them. Americans caused Natives to leave their lands based on broken promises just to get betrayed in the end.

Read More

Andrew Jackson's Economic Policy

1064 Words | 5 Pages

The removal of the Cherokees threatened

Read More

Trail Of Tears Essay Thesis

1849 Words | 8 Pages

From all the population’s forced relocations that happened in our history, the trail of Tears is probably one of the most famous of them, and often refers as a really dark chapter in the US history. Its appellation, “Trail of Tears”, says a lot about the conditions that the Indian populations had to go through during this organized removal. The consideration that the government authorities, led by President Andrew Jackson, had about the Cherokee, Seminole, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek tribes, was inexistent at that time. These forced removals bring us to the point of questioning ourselves: how could a US president encourage the removal of thousands of Indians, based on the fact that their land brimmed with gold? How was this even tolerated by the public opinion, and sometimes ignored by powerful institutions, like the Supreme Court?

Read More

Trail Of Tears: The White Settlers And The Cherokee Nation

664 Words | 3 Pages

Unfortunately, the Cherokee knew if they wanted to keep their land it would not be worked out

Read More

Compare And Contrast Cherokee And Indians

597 Words | 3 Pages

What I learned from this was that the United States government yearned for the Native Americans to move out of ‘their’ land. Most of the tribes moved with no dilemma, but most of the Cherokees refused to move. So they went into a court battle, and the Cherokees won because they had full rights to the land. The President at the time, Andrew Jackson, ousted the ruling and proceeded with the Indian Removal Act. When the soldiers found out what the government wanted them to do was remove the Native Americans from their land, most of them resigned and turned in their insignias and regalia to the military.

Read More

Colin G. Calloway's The World Turned Upside Down

901 Words | 4 Pages

In their letter, the Cherokee leaders express their frustration with the enrichment of European settlers on their lands and their efforts to defend their sovereignty. The leaders write, "we have done all in our power to preserve peace, but our efforts have been fruitless." The Cherokee leaders ask the governor for help defending their land, and they lay out the hardships they and their people have endured due to the invasion. They conclude the letter with an appeal to the governor to take action on their behalf. On another note, the Cherokee leaders continue to speak on behalf of their people, "we cannot suffer our lands to be invaded and destroyed."

Read More

Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

402 Words | 2 Pages

In the letter, the Cherokee nation addresses several reason on why they should not have to move. One reason is that the new land if foreign to them. They are being expected to pack up, leave everything they know, and move to the unknown. Another reason to add on to the above is that there are other Native American tribe already

Read More

Indian Removal Dbq

609 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever been told what to do even though the law says otherwise? Was it easy or fun, but the same thing happened to the Cherokees and it was harder than what you had to go through because there wasn't as much help back then. The Cherokees were told to either move off of the US land or to follow the US rules. The Indian Removal act of 1830 was not justified because Andrew Jackson did not follow the constitution that he signed, the US forced the Cherokees to leave, and the US compelled the Cherokees to rebuild their nation.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Cherokee

Related Topics

Open Document