ipl-logo

Articles Of Confederation Thematic Essay

379 Words2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was written when the United States was a fairly new country, and from the people wanting to create a different government from the king of England. Although this document respected individual rights, it was too loose of a document that could drive the country to success. After revising what they had created, the founding father of the us the created the us constitution. It was more strict, but still valued peoples rights. The Articles of Confederation were so different from the constitution. For example, The Articles of Confederation only had one branch of government called congress, while the constitution 3 branches. These branches are the Legislative branch, the Judicial branch, and the Executive branch. These …show more content…

This made them create the law that to pass any amendments, or to change any, it needed to have 2/3 of congress to vote on it and 3/4 of the states approval, unlike when they had the articles of confederation. The Articles of Confederation had to have all the states agree on an amendment. The only problem with this was that the states had different opinions and views, which resulted in nothing changing. The Articles of Confederation only had 1 representative per state. This was a problem because the ratio of population to the 1 representative was unfair. Another problematic example with the Articles of confederation were that the government could not tax people. This idea seems great when you are a person of the country, but in reality it soon backfires. The government then had no money to build roads, or schools, or do anything because it did have have any money. This is the resulting of no taxes. However in the Constitution , they did have taxes, and thus could build things like roads, schools and other public needs. Even though these documents were created only 6 years difference, they really had their differences. The founding fathers took the lessons learnt from the problematic Articles of confederation and bettered themselves, which resulted in the Constitution we still have

Show More
Related
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation Immediately following the American Revolution, the founding fathers came up with a form of a constitution to run the country. It was called “The Articles of Confederation” and it was inefficient at governing the people due to the weak central government and its inability to impose taxes or raise any form of revenue for the country. It did however, create a Judicial Supreme Court that could oversee states court cases and make a final decision in the most unbiased manner. And yet, it did not unify the states like the Constitution did when it passed.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

How the Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation Outweigh The Strengths In 1775 The American Revolution was uncontrollable, with Britain and the colonies, at the time, going head to head fighting for control. During the chaos, the new nation acknowledged that it needed a stable government if they were going to win the war. Their leaders wrote a set of rules to help control the country in 1777. The Articles of Confederation were a set of rules to be the first document that established the functions of their national government after it declared independence.

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

Based upon analysis of the documents and my knowledge of social studies it is my belief that the weaknesses of the articles of confederation led to a debate among the delegates over individual rights and representation which was ultimately resolved by the compromises in the U.S constitution. The main weakness of the Articles of Confederation comes from the fact that it was called a confederacy which placed all the power in the hands of the states. Back then the central government was basically like a charity, so it could only go around and asks for money not being able to get the right amount of funds to have thing like having a army or a national court system brought a lot of chaos to the state. Massachusetts was one of the main states that

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are vastly different, yet both exhibit what was scene as essential to the success of the nation when they each were written and enacted. It is no doubt that the Articles of Confederation were weak, otherwise citizens and legislative bodies would still be answering to them. However, the Articles served as the nation’s first constitution during the Revolutionary War, of which the United States was the victor. Therefore, despite the differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, both documents are essential to American history and the progress of this country. At the time of ratification in 1781, and well before that, the Articles of Confederation were established to

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

1. The Articles of Confederation had many problems that arose, especially with the national government. States were only issued to have one vote no matter what their population was, support for legislation had to be kept private, and the states had their own power. The Articles of Confederation did not let the national government ask for money, making it harder to achieve all the responsibilities. Individual state governments did not have to agree with any troop requests and could refuse to raise an army.

Read More
188 Words | 1 Pages

Creation and Purpose Of the Articles Of Confederation: The Articles Of Confederation was a framework created by Americans leaders after the American Independence War on March 2, 1781. The Articles Of Confederation loosely unified the states under a single government body, the Confederation Congress. But this framework was soon abandon because of its weakness. In my opinion, the American leaders were doing the right thing in terns of governing. There was indeed needed a government in order to organize the country.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was a document created by the First Continental Congress. This specific document acted as the very first constitution for the United States of America, published on November 15, 1777. Sadly, the Articles of Confederation had some major problems. Therefore, so did America. The new country was now faced with its latest conflict and the articles had to be ratified.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Articles of the Constitution The Articles of Confederation are a series of important statements for our country to live by. “Framers”wrote detailed descriptions of each article that way there would be no confusion on what they stated. They knew that as times passed and society changed we would have to make some changes to these articles. As new presidents emerge and new situations happen, the authors of the Constitution knew that some of their original laws would need to be changed to better benefit the United States.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

Read More

More about Articles Of Confederation Thematic Essay

Open Document