An essential element to a good novel is voice. Voice helps to develop character, theme, and setting. Just like in The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger and 1984 by George Orwell, voice helps give life to the characters. The Catcher in the Rye has a dynamic main character that struggles with fitting in with society. Winston in 1984 is a dry man who is trying to withstand the government's power. In both, voice is shown through point of view, dictation, and tone. To begin, each novel's voice have contrasting points of view that impact character. For instance, the points of view vary when informing the reader of facts. In The Catcher in the Rye, the main character speaks directly to the readers. Holden and Stradlater get in a fight when discussing girls. …show more content…
So I did it. I landed on him like a goddam panther" (16). Holden explains his own actions to the readers. First person allows readers to put themselves in the story, and therefore understand better what is going on. This is extremely different from 1984. In 1984, the narrator just tells readers important information. After Winston realizes the potential power that the Proles would have if they fought the government, the narrator interjects his own opinion. Orwell writes, "But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no need to conspire. They needed only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies" (89). The narrator is an outsider
In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, starting on page 54 the character Beatty makes a speech discussing the origin of the firemen. He claims that the civil was is what began the build to the creation of firemen, bringing about the radio and TV, causing everything to have mass. Then, due to mass production, things become simpler with and exponentially growing population. The simplicity cause films, radio, books, and movies to be movie to cut down, leaving even the classics with snap-ending. These snap-endings lead to school being shortened with the mind set of, why learn?
The purpose of my essay is to explore how different social backgrounds and the social norms that follow affect the personality of two fictive characters and encourage them to break out of their station to find an identity. The protagonists Holden Caulfield in J.D. Salinger’s novel The Catcher in the Rye and Tambudzai in Tsitsi Dangarembga’s novel Nervous Conditions are both victims of social norms. Therefore, the foundation of this essay was to analyze the character’s social background, which has influenced their personalities, behavior and aspirations, and consequently their opposing actions against society. Holden Caulfield is an American adolescent during the period after the Second World War.
One large decision an author makes when in development of a novel comes when he or she must choose what point of view the novel shall be. Point of view is normally the position in which a narrator is, in relation to the story being told. In the novels Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson, and The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, the point of view contributes to how we see and understand each story, as well as strengthening and or weakening a reader's understanding of the story and plot. In the two novels we meet narrators, Melinda Sorindo (Speak), and Holden Caulfield (Catcher), and get to view the books events through their eyes. Melinda and Holden, as the narrators and main characters, are both utilized as the lenses through which we see
As the story progresses, Holden begins to come to his senses and realizes he is not able live in the
This shows how Holden is still trying to keep a hold of his inncence and not just let everything go and turn into a normal adult. He does this as he does not like change as he does not want to grow up and be an adult. This relates to the real world as people might get scared or depressed once put into the complex world of the
Salinger utilizes a first-person point of view in the novel, which allows the reader to learn more about the traits of Holden, the protagonist. This leaves the reader to learn about the traits of the other characters through Holden. Out of all the characters in the novel, Holden spends the most time describing is his sister Phoebe.
Award winning writer, George Orwell, in his dystopian novel, 1984, Winston and O’Brien debate the nature of reality. Winston and O’Brien’s purpose is to persuade each other to believe their own beliefs of truth and reality. They adopt an aggressive tone in order to convey their beliefs about what is real is true. In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston and O’Brien use a variety of different rhetorical strategies and appeals such as parallel structure, pathos, and logos in order to persuade each other about the validity of memories and doublethink; however, each character’s argument contains flaw in logic. Winston debates with O’Brien that truth and reality are individual and connected to our memories.
As the book starts Holden describes his childhood and how he has been kicked out of several school and once more again from his currently school, giving a sense of irresponsibility and no care in the world. Holden later on mentioned slowly the loss of his brother due to leukemia and how he reacted outrageously by breaking the windows of his garage home. As a reader one would view that behavior as abnormal, but Peter Shaw descried it as a normal behavior for a fictional character in the 1950s and by mentioning that Holden, “is presenting in a somewhat different manner than are the sentimentalized young people in other novels if his period” (par. 3), admitting that Holden was somewhat of an outcast of a character even for its time he is still considered normal. Shaw also challenged the reader’s view of Holden by emphasizing that Holden is not a real person, but a fiction character developed in the 1950s and in fact a mad psychological character is normal and made the reading rather more interesting and acceptable during that time. As readers someone may come across as understanding Holden’s behavior due to a loss and everyone mourns differently and as Shaw said, “ the one period of life in which abnormal behavior is common rather than exceptional” (par.
For instance, the novel is written in third-person omniscient with slight moments of first person, narrated by the English patient. “She pours calamine in stripes across his chest where he is less burned, where she can touch him. She loves the hollow below the lowest rib, its cliff of skin,” the speaker describes the actions of Hana and her feelings towards the English patient (Ondaatje 4). Writing in this point of view allows readers to acknowledge specific details about each character and create a stronger bond with them. It also aids in the interpretation of the novel’s plot and allows for a more objective understanding of the events that happen (“The Making” n.p.).
The speech given by Virginia Woolf to a branch of the National Society for Women’s service on January 21, 1931 illustrating what a female writer must go through in order to be successful. Instead of standing before the women and explaining how difficult her journey was, she downplays her experiences and does so in order to convince the women how easy her profession of writing has been. By doing this, she creates a gap between herself and the audience, one that requires the audience to be open-minded and to look at women’s jobs through a different lense. Throughout the essay, she widens the gap, but then closes the gap in order to create common ground with the audience that will help her audience better relate to her ideas.
In the novel, the Catcher in the Rye written by J. D. Salinger, readers question the main character’s authenticity. Holden goes back and forth from acting genuine to acting like a phoney, it’s hard for the reader to trust Holden. Being a phoney is someone acting like they’re someone they’re not, which Holden does at some points. A person can tell when someone is genuine by the way they talk about the subject, how their tone is, and their emotions. Holden struggled with finding people who actually care enough to have a serious talk with him.
As soon as you, beginning reading the novel the first person narration provoke a change in the reader/audience immediately. The reader becomes part of the conversation. “Do I remember?” The Whole Barrio remembers if you want to know the truth.” “I can tell you better of a coincidence you don’t know about.”
The novel is written in the third-person omniscient point of view, which allows Atwood flexibility in her writing, because she is able to give more detail than if it is just written in the perspective of Jimmy. It also allows her to constantly and effectively
In 1984, a dystopian novel written by George Orwell, proles are represented as being generally incompetent in the ability to think and rebel against their stolen rights. However, as the story progresses, Winston comes to a realization that proles are the only ones with the character of human beings and the strength to gain consciousness to overthrow the party. Through this characterization of the proles, Orwell satirizes the detrimental effects of Stalin’s totalitarian government in employing total control and perpetual surveillance of the people in USSR to maintain an established hierarchy. The nature of how the system views the proles is clearly visible through the treatment and description of the proles in the eyes of Winston.
Although it limits the point of view to what the narrator knows and experiences, or can find out by interaction with other characters. The first-person narrator makes the novel more personal because the reader is able to read the direct words of the character and is informed about their immediate emotions. There are various types of first-person narrators, but in this novel the narrator is the main character. Therefore, the narrative point of view is relevant to characterization in J. D. Salinger’s novel because in this novel the main character, Holden Caulfield, is the first-person narrator. The readers are informed about Holden’s innermost thoughts and feelings, but this may be mistakenly unreliable because he lacks insight into his own nature and self-knowledge.