Clover begins by portraying the fact about how slasher films remain ignored by the reprovers. She uses the example of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Page 67) quoting reprovers who accolade the narrative swears Massacre to be imbecilic and a “vile little piece of sick crap". Although, today slasher films continue to be popular and are not ignored by the viewers especially the teenagers. The reason abaft this is that slasher films are direct in whatever ideology they are presenting, unlike the other genres where they may obnubilate their ideology in tropes. Clover promulgates her intention to expound that it is the very characteristics of slasher films that present a more pellucid view of culture than other, more highly accoladed works. She then explains the slasher films as "the immensely generational story of a psycho killer who slashes to death a string of mostly female victims, one by one, until he is himself subdued or killed, usually by the one girl who has survived” (Page 66). Here she is explicating a pattern in horror films where the killer, mundanely male, is consequently killed by the female lead in the cessation to bulwark herself. For an instance, the writer quotes an example of Halloween where the final girl gets to save herself and escape from the killer. Whereas, in …show more content…
As viewers, we are "supposed" to identify the killer but Clover says it in a different manner. She states that these shots want the viewer to get associated with the killer and get close to the real danger. Then as the story proceeds, after the killer's shots, the point-of-view shots then shifts towards the final girl. Yet, in Disturbia, we see the I-camera shots of Kale and very few shots of the killer. Though, the movie should have shown us as for why the killer killed these people more vividly as they depicted the final girl i.e
Through the story the memories and feelings of each girl are uncovered, giving the viewers a glimpse of the ethics, esthetics and eroticism of these teenagers. The movie was heavily promoted as a Thriller in trailers, posters and other media due to its dark and twisted sense of humor, but some critics have claimed to find it somehow misleading, since it also fits in the drama category due to its storyline. The film premiered in theaters in Mexico City on March 4, 2011.
Everywhere I turn I see the same figure–her bloodless arms and relaxed form flung by the murderer on its bridal bier. (...) She had been moved from the posture in which I had beheld her; and now, as she lay, her head upon her arm, and a handkerchief thrown across her face and neck, I might have supposed her asleep. (...) The murderous mark of the fiend’s grasp was on her neck, and the breath had ceased to issue from her lips.”
Myers chose to kill her this way because it is more punishable for a woman to act that way than a man, with a man it is almost expected. In the Novel Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, by Carol L Clover, it is mentioned that the fact that Bob was still punished regardless of to what extent has been the standard for boys in other horror movies as well, "the numbers are not equal, and the scenes not equally charges; but the fact remains that in most slasher films after 1978 (following Halloween), men and boys who go after 'wrong ' sex also die" (Clover, 34). The misogyny displayed by Myers reflects the expectation of women in the 70s. Women had to be prim and proper and it was looked down upon by conservatives to engage in any inappropriate
“Confronting the Fabled Monster, Not to Mention His Naked Mom” contains and abundance of spectacular detail, but the author’s predominant purpose was to criticize the film. Throughout the article the author, Dargis, uses astounding figurative language, comical phrases, and humorous tone. She writes in a humorous tone, using such phrases as, “You could poke your eye out with one of those things! Which is precisely what I thought when I first saw Ms. Jolie’s jutting breast too.”
Once there, she is confronted by the same mask that’s haunted her life over the years. Later, it is revealed that her teenage cousin, assisted by a friend, is the one responsible for the killings. In movies, there is almost always going to be a character to fill the shadow archetypes, especially in the horror genre. In horror movies, it’s usually not hard to point out which character or characters fit the part. In this film, it was a teenage girl and her friend causing havoc on their hometown.
The director makes the argument that unorthodox behavior is worse than murder to portray that unorthodoxy threatens more than the life of one person. Unorthodoxy is so dangerous for the reason that it threatens the whole society, it strikes at society itself (pg.148). D.C.H dislikes Bernard for Bernards heretical views on soma and sport, unorthodox sex life, and refusal to obey teaching of Ford. To humiliate Bernard D.C.H exposes Bernard. For instance, he states, “ this man who stands before you hear, this Alpha-Plus to whom so much has been given, and from whom, in consequence so much must be expected, this colleague of yours or should I anticipate and say this ex colleague?
The Cultural Influences in Japanese Horror Film and Its American Remake (A case study of Ju-On: The Grudge (2002) and The Grudge (2004)) Abstract: Hollywood has produced a number of remakes of Asian horror films, especially Japanese horror films. As the remake is embodies the cultural aspects or American point of view, this research is conducted to see the cultural differences between Japanese horror film and its Hollywood’s remake. Using Joseph Champoux 's observational model and David Edelstein’s Hollywood adaptation rules, this research will identify the specific cultural elements in both movies. The result is separated into two subdivision where the cultural aspects of both country is depicted in both films; the clear explanation of the cause of
By examining the horror genre through the lens of obsessive-compulsive disorder, or OCD, audiences will see how exactly
Karen Hollinger is a professor of English at Atlantic University, an author and is also a very strong feminist. Hollinger’s essay, “The Monster as Woman: Two Generations of Cat People,” is an essay merely expressing how most monsters in novels or films are characterized as masculine identities and that viewers forget how powerful feminine identities in novels and films can be. Hollinger’s goal in this essay is to explain that feminine monsters are just as frightening all masculine monsters. She uses many references to movies with feminine monsters and expresses how powerful they are compared to masculine monsters and also expresses that males and females have castration anxieties. I think Hollinger succeeded in a sophisticated way because she
Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 film Psycho redirected the entire horror genre, and in doing so dismantled the prudent 1950’s societal barriers of cinema. Although unseen for its potential by the large studios of the time, Psycho became one of the crowning achievements of film history. While based partially on a true story of murder and psychosis from Wisconsin, the widespread viewing of this tale made way for a new era of film and ushered in a new audience of movie goers. The use of violence, sexual explicitness, dramatic twists, sound, and cinematography throughout this film gave Hitchcock his reputable name and title as master of suspense.
When Beatty hears about how this girl died and how she was different from everyone he put the two pieces together. Beatty is explaining, through dialogue, how a dystopian society does not want anyone to
They use their sexuality to control and manipulate the man into doing her bidding, often these tasks are immoral acts that will benefit her, however, it would bring eventual destruction for the man. The femme fatales is often brought to justice and punished by the protagonist, ultimately she gets destroyed. Beckman adds that “the dangerous woman is almost always punished for her threat to masculinity and male power. The strong, independent, and sexually provocative femme fatale is typically subdued toward the end of the film noir, through her death, her abandonment, or her "rescue" from moral decline by a man. If it is correct that a certain Hollywood realism tends to confirm a patriarchal status quo through coordinating the gradual unmasking of the sexual power of the woman with the "epistemological drive of the narrative," then this tradition of narrative continuity itself must be of interest” (p 26-27).
One of the lengthiest and most obscure debates among cinema fans regards the topic of what is cult, what art-house and what mainstream. Usually, discussions like that do not reach a definite conclusion, however, there are some themes, notions and events that define what is cult, which is the point of interest of this particular list. The filmmakers that shot the films in this list challenged the notions of everything considered normal and even acceptable by society, in terms of politics, culture, history, society, violence and sex. This tactic originated from their non-existent regard for commercial success and resulted in broken taboos, offensive and even blasphemous images, characters, dialogues and themes, and even to a number of hilarious
“One in five women will be a victim of rape or attempted rape in her lifetime” (23). Gabriel Garcia Marquez wrote Chronicle of a Death Foretold. The book takes place in the 1950s in a small Columbian town. The book is a murder mystery and describes the murder of Santiago Nasar. Pedro and Pablo end up killing Santiago because he is accused of taking Angela’s virginity before she is married.
The camera was rotating around her, which built the intensity of the scene and symbolized Katherine’s emotions, that everything was spinning out of control. Spielberg finally ended the movie with a powerful and intriguing cliffhanger which leads to the possibility of a sequel. This film also presented the viewers with a variety of themes. There was strong sense of feminism through Katherine Graham.