B. Leadership Styles Whether he envisioned his impressive future or not, his leadership skills ultimately guided his career trajectory (Lopez, 2014). Powell’s leadership styles allowed him to contribute in guiding his country to the right decisions. While in the administrative office, he shared his thoughts about the conflicts in some Middle East countries, weapons of mass destruction, and the country’s intelligence information capacity. Guided by his leadership styles, he was able to create plans that could be effective in ensuring peace and order to his country. Despite the difficulties, politicians and foreign leaders encounter, for Powell, effective leadership comes from those who have the ability to inspire a population …show more content…
The Colin Powell's 13 rules of leadership are: 1. It ain't as bad as you think; 2. Get mad, then get over it; 3. Avoid having your ego so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego goes with it; 4. It can be done; 5. Be careful what you choose. You may get it; 6. Don't let adverse facts stand in the way of a good decision; 7. You can't make someone else's choices; 8. Check small things; 9. Share credit; 10. Remain calm. Be kind; 11. Have a vision; 12. Don't take counsel of your fears or naysayers; 13. Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier. Based on these rules, Powell’s view on leadership could be compared to the maverick leaders, George Washington, in particular. Even when he followed his 13 signature rules, there were complexities in Mr. Powell’s career as secretary of state (Lopez, 2014). His career as a secretary of state made him a highly transformational person who could help other leaders in choosing the things that could benefit many. Powell placed an emphasis on reaffirming diplomatic alliances worldwide by means of peace efforts in the Middle East and his support to the national missile defense system. To reinvigorated U.S diplomacy through several reforms pointing in culture, technology, facilities, and security was among his goals. He also focused on improving bilateral relationships and his initiatives in settling various crisis such as in …show more content…
The rule number four of Powell says, ‘it can be done’ wherein he explained that “leaders are about making things happen; they continually ask when faced with the improbable; while one approach may not be the greatest way to do it, perhaps it can be done another way; therefore find the other way to make it happen!” Powell believes that determined leaders are the ones who could make better changes. No matter how hard the things are for, great leaders know how to innovate solution and achieve common goals. In his rule number ten, remaining calm is very important; “it is hard for a leader to inspire confidence and resilience in others if he cannot keep his composure in times of difficulty; it is hard for a leader to garner loyalty from others if he treats them badly; remain calm and be kind and your team will climb mountains for you!” Powell’s leadership qualities incorporate calmness and serenity, especially when facing great tribulation. As a leader, he inspired his men to think more than twice in making decisions and to remain calm in the midst of emotional
At the end of the Second World War, the European economy was devastated and the continent was in despair, and there was no political or economic stability in the region. Secretary Marshall believed that a politically stable and an economically strong Europe could serve the best interests of the United States. In June of 1947, Marshall revealed his mega plan for his European economic recovery program, also known as the “Marshall Plan”, which would, modernize industry, boost trade and make Europe prosperous continent again. The plan was a big success that laid the framework for a rebuilding of war ruined Europe and the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Marshall was not only dedicated to building a strong defense to safeguard the freedom and security of our nation, but also determined to find peaceful solutions to world conflicts.
Being a “great man” who is a great leader requires that one be willing to do what is lawfully right when his or her personal feelings might not align with the laws. An example of President Bush doing what is mandated by the state when his heart saw “right” as something entirely different, is in the case of Karla Faye Tucker. Tucker was facing the death penalty for multiple murders. In The Leadership Genius of George W. Bush, Thompson and Ware dictate a letter that Faye wrote to the then governor of Texas, George W. Bush, in a desperate plea to pardon her execution. Karla revealed her dramatic change in character due to her salvation and belief in Jesus Christ.
John Quincy Adams’ decision to support the Louisiana Purchase put him at odds with the Federalist party and his colleagues in the Senate. His religious faith and faith in the future prosperity of the country (westward expansion) inspired his decision to vote “yes” on the Louisiana Purchase—a controversial proposition as the only Federalist that supported the acquisition. “His guiding star was the principle of Puritan statesmanship his father had laid down many years before: ‘The magistrate is a servant not of his own desires, not even of the people, but of his God’”. Nevertheless, the Puritan principle drove Adams to vote for the Embargo Act of 1807 as well, ultimately costing him his seat in the Senate. “The country is so totally given
He knew that he needed experts around him to manage his foreign policy. Carter had confidence in the law in universal undertakings and in the standard of self-determination for all individuals. In addition, he needed the United States to lead the pack in advancing all inclusive human rights. Carter trusted that American force needs to be practiced sparingly and that the United States should keep away
The effectiveness of a leader lives and dies on the decisions that leader makes. It is a leader's job not only to make decisions that will be successful but to make decisions in a way that will be followed as well. When a leader commits to a decision that they have made and does not waiver from it, at very least it gives off the appearance of strength. It is human nature to follow the leader who we view as the strongest; the one who we see as giving us the best chance of survival. However, humans also tend to follow leaders who make decisions that they see as most beneficial to them; either out of respect for the leader or fear of something else.
America had participated in its fair share of wars in the twentieth century. Germany as a whole had been in a political and economic drought ever since the last world war and Reagan was offering a hand of help through his speech when saying, “I understand the fear of war and the pain of division that afflict this continent – and I pledge to you my country’s efforts to help overcome these burdens.” Reagan had also held two summits with Secretary Gorbachev and wanted more. Reagan had been doing his part and clarified to the Secretary that his contribution and willingness to make changes was a necessity to future progression: “General Secretary Gorbachev if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate!” Tough love and bluntness often times are required to make actual change.
Do more right things than wrong things and success is inevitable."
As a former Vice President, Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Commerce, Henry A. Wallace, a strong proponent of the New Deal and advocate of a more lenient Soviet Union policy which ultimately became controversial within the Democratic Party. Although Wallace’s criticism of President Harry S. Truman’s resulted in his dismissal, he nevertheless, actively voiced his criticisms during the Cold War. In “The Path to Peace with Russia,” Wallace criticized America’s foreign policy, while asking to judge the Soviet Union interests against those of the United States. Henry believed the United States involvement in the reconstruction of the Soviet Union could have helped the economies of both countries only if the mentality of international affairs could have been shifted. Wallace’s private letter, primarily to influence President Trumans’ thinking was achieved by creating a world where the United States was without their air bases, weapons and the atomic bomb and a Soviet Union who had “[created] a level of armed strength far exceeding anything in their previous history.”
Then George wanted to tell everyone America’s role in the nation. George thought that the United States should show good justice and good faith toward all nations. That how the United States would act toward all nations would distinguish them from other
As he lives in a turbulent world where many conflicting interests meet, he often finds himself in trouble. Luckily, his gutsy resilience and clarity of vision always get him through. Well, almost always. Leaders face the continuing challenge of how they can meet the expectations of those who placed them there. Addressing these expectations usually takes the form of strategic decisions and actions.
Finally, I must confess that my working definition of leadership needs renovation and attempt to tailor it to my own style of leadership. I equate the Experienced Guide style to “elderly wisdom”. It is the retired neighbor that knows how to do all the home maintenance on his own and makes yard care look
During Woodrow Wilson’s presidency, Wilson wanted our economy to change and look beyond our best interests and spread our democracy overseas. The United States worked hard to stay consistent internationally. The United States took action in the traditional Western Hemisphere and in Europe before/during World War I. Wilson’s vision for security in leadership
Papathanasiou et al. (2014, p. 407) outline authentic leadership as the ability to influence the actions and behaviour of individuals to work together to achieve their goals. Additionally, Goffee and Jones (2005, p. 87) describe authentic leadership as a real thing, an attribute that uniquely defines great leaders. Furthermore, they highlight that authentic leaders are highly attuned to their environment and that whilst they retain their distinctiveness they understand how to strongly influence and win acceptance in strong cultures and how to utilise those cultures as a basis for radical change. President Kennedy also displayed attributes of an effective transformational leader in a time of crisis and sought to inspire and encourage the population to develop and achieve their greatest potential.
One quality all leaders have is confidence. Confidence is crucial to have when something goes wrong. A leader is confident when they are brave in hard situations and keep going even if others are doubting. After the spaceship in Apollo 13 broke, the newspaper editors were doubting Jean and his crew. Jean cut the newspaper editors off and said, “ All do respect sir, I believe this is going to be our finest hour.”
Bruce and Vernakis mentioned that decisiveness especially in high-risk situations were also the result of discipline . Speaking of such situations, this is one of the main difference between military and non-military leadership- being better trained to be calm and composed in stressful, dangerous situations and understanding strategic actions