Alice, in the book, doesn’t have a childlike exuberance. In the movie, she does bring this exuberance. Basically, Alice is energetic in the movie but not in the book. Characters were, still are, and will continue to be the most important part of movies, but sometimes producers change them. As a wrap, most of the time it’s better to read the book than watching the movie.
Due to this fact, it's best for one to understand why they gave up on silent films and what makes watching them so difficult in our current age. People usually give up on silent films for three reasons. The first is due to a lack of dialogue. If one was to think about it, dialogue is one of the most important elements in a film and to the film’s audience. Since silent films don’t actually contain any type of verbal dialogue that can be heard by the audience, this missing element makes it extremely difficult for most people to both watch and understand what is happening in the film.
While I would not argue against the notion that there is some transference of real-life schemata to infer meaning for on-screen actions, Bordwell does not address that, even though film try to emulate realism, in the end they will be fiction – even if they are documentaries as well. Films have a constraint in relation to time, they simply cannot emulate the depth of a real person and the spectator can only do so much to fill in the blanks for characters on-screen, to fulfill the depth of a real person. To give credence to this transference of real schemata, we can look at Theory-of-mind (find source!). A key development as a human to fully develop the social understanding of the intentions of others, which is needed in society. It seems logical then, that this understanding is applied to the fictional characters on-screen.
Either war movie reconstructs the reality of the past and the real way people treated each other or it presents fictional reality. Today’s viewer very often confuses fiction with reality. In addition, moviemakers often combine historical reconstruction with their own fictional elements. If some war movies had been made in the times in which their storylines are located, the viewers would probably have not considered those movies racists. Nevertheless, today's viewer live in different, modern reality and is aware of any signs of bias.
The most prominent similarity was the fact that Liesel still adored to steal and read books. Without this trait, this would be an entirely different book. The two most salient differences between the book and movie were the fact that Max Vandenburg didn’t give Liesel and books and that Death didn’t give any, or almost any, comments and narrations. Without these, there are noticeable differences between the film adaptation and book. All in all, I prefered the book better.
As for me, I both agree and disagree with the statement. First of all, I agree because in the process of adaptation, the director has to do a lot of thinking to create a movie from a text. There are many lots of element that would fit greatly in text but not in movie, such as background story, characters’ thinking and character’s background. Therefore, the film director needs to create something to explain to the audience about it by using flashbacks or dialogues. When the director thinks about adding it to explain to audience, they also need to consider whether it will affect the whole story or whether it fits with the plot.
It demonstrated what a few individuals really need to manage in ordinary life. While at this movie there were numerous scenes that were exceptionally scandalous for me. Numerous issues in this movie need to manage how one envisions oneself. This is an elegantly composed movie despite the fact that it demonstrates reality behind oppressive family units. In this movie, Precious needs to manage numerous things; that no young person ought to need to confront.
Unfortunately, Sirens is the first SAC student film that I truly did not like and, honestly, it was difficult to see past the plot, which, again, I really did not enjoy or understand at many points. It had a few strong aspects independent of the story, but as Weston says in Directing Actor, not even great acting can make a poor script into a truly great movie. In this case, I think that the script really was a hindrance for the actors because there appeared to causality and thus no reasoning behind the plot progression and the film lacked the emotion depth required of an effectual film. I have thought about it quite a bit and I am still unsure of what the film wanted me to take away from it. To begin, I will address some of the things that
While some people like this style, I personally do not. Another component I don’t like about this novel is how cliché it is. The story-line is pretty basic and can be found in many other shows, movies and book, and doesn’t present uniqueness. Though it creates a beautiful, heart-warming story, I would have enjoyed seeing something different
The “Catharsis Theory” might have been a very widespread theory, but due to its lack of empirical evidence, it is rejected and considered irrelevant by many researchers nowadays (Khoo & Oliver, 2013). 2.2 Terror Management Theory by Goldenberg The “Terror Management Theory”, developed by Goldenberg, is another approach that gives a possible explanation for seeking out negative emotions by the usage of mass media. The theory states that watching tragic films enables the