Integrity in The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter
People around the world tend to deal with their mistakes in their own way and can lead to unforeseen consequences. Nathaniel Hawthorne and Arthur Miller use symbolism, imagery and ithe experiences of Arthur Dimmesdale and John Proctor in The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter to express the concept of integrity and how when people go against their principles/morals and attempt to deal with them, they and the people around them might suffer the consequences.
One can see that both John Proctor and Arthur Dimmesdale suffer internally from the actions they committed. Proctor committed a cardinal sin and one can see that throughout the story, there was some conflict within himself. Proctor is a man
…show more content…
Proctor has been faltering from confessing because he was seen as somewhat of a role model. If someone were to hold the same position as Proctor does in their community, it would be daunting to have such a secret. If any word of that secret gets out, his reputation would be immediately demolished because people who are higher up on the social ladder are held at a higher standard than your average person. Proctor’s conflict looks tame compared to that of Arthur Dimmesdale. Like Proctor, Dimmesdale held influence and power in his community and was highly respected. However, their conflicts were marginally different. Dimmesdale suffered both internally and externally. His thoughts were plagued with visions of Hester and Pearl which scared him to death. Dimmesdale also considered using physical pain as a path to relief. When the author describes the effects of the “inward trouble”(Hawthorne 175) that Dimmesdale was experiencing, he talks about how “In Mr. Dimmesdale’s secret closet, under lock and key, there was a bloody scourge”(Hawthorne 175). The “scourge” is referring to the whip he uses in order to “purify the body”. Dimmesdale is a person who believes in inflicting pain in order to amend for his sins. Moreover, when Dimmesdale is on the scaffold …show more content…
In The Crucible, Miller fully displays how the actions of John Proctor really affected the lives of the people around him. His affair with Abigail reveals to be potent to the people around him. Because of Abigail’s desires for Proctor to leave Elizabeth because she questions “how such a strong man may let such a sickly [woman] be [his wife]”(Miller 23). She insults Proctor’s wife as a way to blacken the image of Elizabeth in Proctor’s mind but it seems to have the opposite effect as Proctor yells that [She’ll] speak nothin’ of Elizabeth!(Miller 23). This all leads to Elizabeth still playing along with the pretense of witchcraft and finally accusing Elizabeth herself in a devious plan. She stabs herself and blames Elizabeth in order to get her arrested and Proctor to herself. The idea stemmed when Mary Warren was making her poppet, “Abby sat beside [her] when [she] made it.” (Miller 76). This shows that Abigail’s idea was conjured up at this moment and she is later found stabbed in the same spot as the needle was on the doll. One can say that Abigail is a vengeful woman simply because of her lust. She exploits the calamity which gave rise to the witch trials. Her jealousy of Elizabeth overcomes her and it drives her to do unforgivable things. Abigail is a smart woman who has calculated the odds in order to get what she wishes for. She takes advantage of the
If you’ve ever read The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, or The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, you may have made a connection between the two. These two texts relate in many different ways and of course, they also have numerous differences. While comparing and contrasting the two texts, The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter, I concluded on three similarities including: a conflicted male, reputation, and setting; three differences include: reactions from Hester and Abigail, attitude of Roger Chillingworth and Elizabeth Proctor, and the communities’ opinions on the Reverends. John Proctor from the Crucible and Arthur Dimmesdale from the Scarlet Letter both share a conflict in theses texts. Both characters obviously, have made the decision
When his wife confronted him and questioned him he got made at her for accusing him even though he literally did. It's also very against his religion to cheat and said nine out of ten of the commandments and the one he missed was about adultery. Proctor continues to lie to people and his wife. Proctor changes his personality so much and is so bipolar in his thoughts.
She is a cold, sniveling woman…”(1.203). Abigail's attempt to get rid of Elizabeth is to spread the word of her evil ways and to accuse her of witchcraft. This method of manipulation is turning the entire society of Salem against Elizabeth, since eliminating Elizabeth is the key to John Proctor. She spreads lies to make everybody replicate her personal thoughts onto others: miserable and lonely. This demonstrates the manipulative side of Abigail that takes advantage of others throughout the story.
Fear blinds him because of his need to retain the respect of the Salem villagers. This need leads to the unsuccessful protection of his reputation but also his downfall. Proctor has to be a tragic hero to properly portray how corruption is so deeply embedded in a society that even such a powerful, honest, respected member of this society, himself, was affected. His fall from this high status to one of a witch reveals that he is affected. If Proctor remained only a hero, prevented his flaw from destroying his reputation, then the corruption born from the fear created would not be as significant.
Abigail wanted to get her vengeance on Elizabeth Proctor for firing her as a maid. John Proctor screamed in rage at Judge Danforth, “She thinks to dance with me on my wife’s grave!... But it is a whore’s vengeance, and you must see it…”(3.863-8). Abigail wanted to kill or blame Elizabeth for witchcraft to get her vengeance. She may have wanted vengeance, but that did not happen as much as scapegoating like when Abigail scapegoated Tituba.
As Bob Marley once said, “The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.” Integrity is the quality of being honest and upholding one’s morals and principles. Living in a fast-paced and ever-changing society, human beings have come into contact with adversity and hardship all throughout history. Those who act with integrity during tough times have a major influence on those around them, and taking a stand and upholding ones’ beliefs and morals at great self sacrifice can inspire and encourage others to do the same. Arthur Miller’s 1953 play, The Crucible is a prime example of upholding integrity, and the characters within the play face difficult choices between doing
Proctor talks good about the people who decided not to confess. He Doesn't want to say anything that will harm them. Proctor doesn't think he’s doing the right thing by confessing and wants to change his mind to do the right thing. John proctor is successful in helping his friends be
Integrity is an essential piece of heroism, this can especially be seen in the novel "The Crucible" as the two ideals of integrity and heroism collide. Many different conclusions could be made from reading this novel when it comes to both integrity and heroism. While there are characters like John Proctor whom exhibits heroism through integrity, selflessness, and bravery, there are other characters whom sacrifice their own integrity in order to preserve their own imagine. These characters are portrayed as dynamic villains like Reverend Parris and Abigail Williams and others like Salem's own Sheriff whom is less dynamic and a greater linear character. Each individual's integrity would change constantly throughout the story due to a constant stacking of lies, all of which is rooted to one's struggle to keep a good image by forfeiting her own integrity.
Integrity is “the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles”. In the crucible, john proctor shows this definition through his actions and words. He stands up for what he believes in despite the consequences he may face. For example, when the proctor shows his commitment to the truth and justice. He states “ Because it is my name!
It Proctor values his reputation, albeit in a positive way (unlike characters such as Abigail) when he says"Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name?
These changes take him from lustful and deceiving to loving and loyal. In The Crucible Arthur Miller paints John Proctor to be a lecherous man. In act one Proctor and Abigail are speaking somewhat hastily when proctor says,"Abby, I may think of you softly from time to time. But I will cut off my hand before I’ll ever reach for you again"(Miller 23).
She accuses Elizabeth of casting a spell on her that caused her to be stabbed, but she really had stabbed herself. Abigail wants revenge on Elizabeth since she is in love with Proctor and Elizabeth is in the way justifying her ethics. In The Crucible Elizabeth is loving towards others unlike Abigail who revengeful. For the duration of The Crucible Elizabeth and Abigail express very contradictory traits following the theme of protecting their integrity.
John Proctor’s words towards Elizabeth signal irritation and annoyance. John Proctor, the main character of The Crucible, has an affair with a much younger girl, Abigail Williams, breaking his wife, Elizabeth’s trust in him. Her suspicion of him rises when he tells her he was in a room alone with Abigail. Elizabeth’s growing mistrust begins to aggravate John, which is revealed when he says, “I’ll not have your suspicion any more” (489). Elizabeth is doubtful after learning about John’s affair with Abigail and her lack of trust in her husband begins to anger him.
Moreover, he would be justifying the existence of witches, which would further galvanize future spurious accusations. In addition, Proctor claimed, “I have three children - how may I teach them to walk like men in the world, and I sold my friends?” This quote insinuates that if he were to lie to his kids, they would not admire him as a role model and instead feel ashamed of him. Clearly, Proctor’s honor contributed to the ultimate decision of ripping up the signed
Expressionist artist, Edvard Munch, created a popular painting given the name “The Scream” for its representation of the embodiment of suffering on man and nature. The landscape of the painting is a “dark orange sky” meant to represent the suffering of nature as it is being destroyed by volcanic eruptions and natural disasters. The figure of a man with an “agonized expression” is said to be a result of the great amount of suffering he encounters as both nature and the world around him ceases to exist. Suffering comes in a variety of different ways and at a myriad of different degrees. While suffering appears in many different forms throughout The Scarlet Letter in both Hester and Dimmesdale, the suffering of Dimmesdale is much worse because of the copious amounts of guilt within his conscience.