Mathilde has to learn the hard way that greediness does not result in good outcomes. She also learns that honesty is always the best policy, and with these lessons she has to go through the consequences of her actions. Along with being greedy and dishonest, Mathilde is also very ungrateful for all of the hard work that her husband has put in to support her. “Hard work doesn’t build character for her; it signifies a lack of power and status on the part of the worker.” (Miller) The fact that her husband is simply a lowly clerk is very bothersome to Mathilde, even though he is a very hardworking man with great character. No matter how much he cared for her the way a husband should, she was never happy.
This is very selfish because even after her husband makes sacrifices for her, she still believes that it is not enough for her to go to the ball. She even slugs around the house and moans being depressed that the dress is not enough. Both of these actions just further the belief that Matilde is very
Since the necklace was so costly, she has to work to earn back the money she had spent on the necklace. You will soon learn that her character improved and changed for the better. Mathilde’s humility was abused by her ungratefulness, unrealistic fantasies, entitlement, and pride but improved as the story went along. Mathilde was a beautiful and charming lady who married a clerk in the Ministry of Education. Though she was physically beautiful, inside she was ungrateful and had a very spoiled nature.
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde Loise was a beautiful woman who envied those of the lavish lifestyle. She married an ordinary man despite her beauty because she lacked a dowry. Mathilde got the opportunity to go to an evening reception and borrowed a diamond necklace from a rich friend, Mme. Forestier. However, she lost the necklace.
For instance, Mathilde wants to be rich but she becomes poor. Throughout the story, Mathilde complains and wishes that she is rich like her friend Jeanne. Her life is fine living in a simple apartment with a maid and a hardworking husband. But she is still not satisfied in middle class. Soon after she declines to poor.
One of the situational ironies in “The Necklace” is that she wants to be beautiful and rich, but she becomes the opposite. After paying the debt she owed for the necklace she lost to replace it and get a new one, she lost her money and
To illustrate, both women inside felt incomplete that they lost what they desired. What is meant to be said is that both either have lost something, or wanted something. Nevertheless, both of them were missing something that clearly ruins their conditions in life. Consequently, Mathilde Loisel from “The Diamond Necklace” and Emily Grierson from “A Rose for Emily” are two women from two different short stories who faced different circumstances throughout a phase of their life. To begin with, Miss Emily Grierson is quite a strange character with an erratic behavior due to the fact that her situation could go in any number of directions.
That said, Voltaire’s Candide and Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” are both good stories that play against the reader’s expectations and end off rather ironically, unexpectedly. In Voltaire’s Candide, the titular character kept going through many obstacles and unusual situations, which conventionally builds up the reader’s expectations, but the story ends rather oddly and unconventionally with Cunegonde, Candide’s love interest, becoming unattractive and unpleasant (chapter 29), with the baron, Cunegonde’s brother, still disapproving of Candide and Cunegonde’s relationship (chapter 29), and with Pangloss no longer truly believing that this world is the best of all possible worlds (chapter 30). Firstly, had Cunegonde had the reverse effect, going from an ugly, disagreeable woman to beautiful and charming, her character would have played to the notion of a happy, conventional
Guy de Maupassant, the author of "The Necklace", uses foreshadowing to develop the theme that there are consequences for being untruthful. Foreshadowing gives the reader hints to predict a result in the story. In the text, Mrs.Loisel "didn't listen to him and rapidly descend the stairs." The quote shows foreshadowing because when Mrs.Loisel didn't listen to her husband, and instead quickly left the party, it gave the reader a hint that something is going to happen to Mrs.Loisel. As the story progresses, the story states that Mrs.Loisel lost the diamond necklace and created a plan to trick Mrs.Forestier into thinking that she never lost the necklace.