Danforth Vs. Proctor In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

662 Words3 Pages

A fair, pliable, and equitable judge during a trial is key. Judges must be able to view both sides and not be fooled by the other into their party. Such privilege was not given by Danforth who was a buyest, arrogant, and controlling judge during the Salem witch trials in the novel The Crucible by Arthur Miller. Danforth is the ultimate villain because he kept the Salem witch trials viable by allowing no fair representation in court and allowed court to be narrow minded.

To begin with Danforth is the ultimate villain because he kept the Salem witch trials viable by allowing no fair representation in court. In the novel The Crucible Danforth states “[The pure in heart need no lawyer. Proceed as you will]” (Miller 93). In this scene Danforth is talking to Proctor. Proctor is one of the men who had his wife arrested due to an accusation of witchcraft. Proctor is attempting to prove his friends wifes as well as his own wife's innocence. In a normal proceeding a lawyer would be one on behalf of Mr Proctor to defend his wife's innocence. However Danforth as stated in the novel thought that as long as you're telling the truth it is enough. However readers …show more content…

“[...a person is either with the court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between.]” (Miller 94). In this scene Danforth was given a testament of 91 landowners who thought good of Elizabeth Proctor, Rebbeca Nurse, and Martha Corey who were arrested for accusation of witchcraft. Danforth instead of questioning why such a large number of individuals would stick up for women accused of witchcraft instead thought of them as if they were against the court.This shows that there was no middle ground of whether witchcraft was present or not in Salem. Danforth only saw those who didn't agree with his conclusion on the three wifes arrested as individuals who were against the

Open Document