ipl-logo

Descartes First Meditation John Locke Analysis

1857 Words8 Pages

One of Descartes’ many critiques was that of fellow philosopher John Locke. Using Locke I will argue that many of Descartes claims in his meditations on innate knowledge and reality show problematic. I do not totally agree with his proposition that only the mind can produce certain knowledge and that our senses are always under the attack of the devil that deceives us. I do however agree with Locke’s argument which opposes Descartes concerning doubt in the first meditation. During Descartes first meditation the focus was placed on doubt and how knowledge is innate in each of us. Next, Descartes highlighted that idea and further explained that our senses can be considered as doubtful or deceiving. Therefore, any knowledge that was acquired through the senses is doubtful and the knowledge that we have gained is from innate ideas or concepts we create in our mind. Descartes believed that we are in a state of dreaming. In this state, our senses deceive and fool us in believing …show more content…

Descartes started his argument by saying that the knowledge of God is again innate in us. Again we see ta major problem here in the statement of Descartes. Experience will teach us the moral principles and the background needed to understand and have the knowledge about God. How can Descartes explain that God can be innate in us if experience gained from the senses would be the basis for us to understand and have a notion about God. His contradictions can only lead to confusion and back tracking. “If the objective reality of any of my ideas is found to be so great that I am that I am certain that the same reality was not in me…” (Descartes 29). John Locke considered our minds during infancy as a clean slate. During that time knowledge is added to the mind by the use of our sense experience and not by mere innate ideas. I did not have the innate idea of the stove being hot as a

Show More
Related

  • Sor Filotea De La Cruz Analysis

    990 Words  | 4 Pages

    There is no way to know everything there is to know. This means that knowledge will always be inherently limited by numerous different factors. According to DesCartes, knowing can only be applied to what one has clearly observed to be true (111). Observable knowledge can be limited by things such as background and sex. However, the greatest limitation may be lack of skepticism, whether it be questioning oneself or an authority.

    Read More

  • Descartes 'Argument From Past Failure'

    1301 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to Descartes, God gave human beings senses, however, Descartes’ philosophy suggests that the senses do not represent the true natures of physical objects. This can be seen throughout Descartes’ first three meditations, as there a recurring theme that the senses are an unreliable method to grasp the true nature of physical objects. Introducing the concept of a benevolent and non-deceiving God who would not allow humans to be deceived by their senses, Descartes claims that despite all this deceit, the senses are still reliable to a certain extent and that error is due to our imperfection rather than the fault of God. In the First Meditation, Descartes calls all his beliefs and knowledge into doubt, stating that there were many instances

    Read More

  • Descartes Sixth Meditation Analysis

    1919 Words  | 8 Pages

    This essay will now begin the task of laying out the objection to Descartes’

    Read More

  • Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

    Read More

  • Descartes Meditation Argument

    1004 Words  | 5 Pages

    Descartes' Meditation I is based on finding out if anything in this world is absolutely certain. That our own bodies and hands are actually our hands and bodies. That when we step outside and walk to our car, we are actually seeing our car. While doing this, he also wanted a foundation of knowledge that he would be able to build upon. The method he chooses to go with was to doubt everything that he knows, society knows, and in general everything, and look at what remains.

    Read More

  • Descartes Dreaming Argument Analysis

    1173 Words  | 5 Pages

    However ever so often our senses have tricked us and what appears to be most true to reality can be dreamt to be the case. Since our senses have tricked us even once before trusting them could be a poor judgement ( Reason and Responsibility, Joel Feinberg and Russ Shafer-Landau, 2013, Descartes, First Meditation, page 201). Thus this leads us to

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes On Personal Identity

    1801 Words  | 8 Pages

    In contrast, Locke believes, that knowledge can only have a high degree of certainty but cannot be certain. Since he does not focus much on certainty in his works, he believes that perception can play a major part in the process of knowledge. He further reiterates that knowledge is based on observations and senses. According to his him, ideas come from reflection and sensation while knowledge is founded on experience In summary, I have covered the respective positions and views that both Locke and Descartes hold in respect with self-identity and consciousness.

    Read More

  • Cartesian Skeptical Argument Analysis

    1448 Words  | 6 Pages

    While assuming these things, Descartes disproves his own argument. He states that one can never know anything through senses, because at any moment one might be dreaming and therefore the evidence on which you are basing your beliefs might be false. Stroud ’s argument, in modus ponens argument form, refutes Descartes’ argument regarding the external world.

    Read More

  • Neutral Question Essay

    1592 Words  | 7 Pages

    His method of gaining knowledge was simply to start from the bottom and work his way up. Descartes, also, emphasized the fact that human beings often make mistakes in their beliefs. Additionally, Descartes mainly used deduction to get to his answers, which could increase validity. The way Descartes created questions, building up his knowledge from scratch and doubting everything that was previously said and done, can arguably be considered as neutral. However, as a counterargument, his intent could be considered to not be neutral, as he clearly makes a statement on how knowledge should be perceived; based on sense perception and reasoning as ways of knowing only, and his way of leading a discussion, with language as a way of

    Read More

  • Descartes Senses Are Sometimes Deception

    689 Words  | 3 Pages

    My thesis is that Descartes is correct when he says that the senses can be deceived and therefore they cannot be trusted, Descartes mentioned that he would confront the principles which he had supported everything that he believed. In most of the cases we use the information that our senses give us as true; however, we cannot trust our senses because they can deceive us and provide us with information that is not true or accurate. Descartes’ best argument for my thesis is that as he mentioned “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive, and it is mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once”. We cannot trust and relay that our senses are dependable. “Even thought the senses do sometimes deceive us when it is a question of very small and distant things.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Dream Argument

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Rene Descartes’ first meditation “Concerning Those Things That Can Be Called into Doubt,” he presents the dream argument, which claims that our senses are not a trustworthy source of our knowledge of our external world because they can at times be deceitful. In this paper I will show that Descartes’ argument is successful because there is no way we can know for certain what our state is at any given time (if we are awake or if we are asleep). After Descartes introduces his argument he goes on to say that he cannot tell whether he is awake or asleep at that moment. He does this by introducing the experiences of a madman, which can never be certain since its brains are always deceiving him, and comparing himself to the madman.

    Read More

  • How Did Rene Descartes Obtain True Knowledge

    921 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rene Descartes, who is an rationalist, has his views on knowledge which is believing that knowledge is possible only if it is based upon self-evidence and certain principles. Rene Descartes constructed an methodical doubt to find true knowledge which was to doubt and put aside everything that he knew. In his first meditation Descartes discusses how our sense perceptions are able to deceive us. Descartes portrays our senses as a

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Model Of Knowledge

    1194 Words  | 5 Pages

    Descartes’s knowledge was not truly neutral, even though he states that he frees his mind from all previous influence. Knowledge cannot be found based on what has yet to be proven. But it is possible to find knowledge on presumptions. Presumptions come first. While Descartes attempts to challenge the then-current set of beliefs, his attempt ultimately was to only replace one set of principles with

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Meditation On First Philosophy Analysis

    743 Words  | 3 Pages

    Famous French philosopher Rene Descartes wrote a 6 part book entitled “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in which he documents his thoughts as he attempts to discard all beliefs in all things physical by reason of doubt, and then later attempts to prove that things do indeed exist as simple “truths,” and eventually works his way back up to believing that the physical world exists. One of these “truths” was the idea that a supremely perfect being, like God, has to exist; the argument being that we would not be able to imagine something like him without having to find the base idea in an other existing being. Since God is supremely perfect, it would require an actual perfect being to exist for us to be able to imagine a God. Descartes also argues that God is an honest God because deceit is an “imperfection,” something of which a supremely perfect being simply cannot have. Another argument he has made to support his idea is that the idea of God must be an innate idea, meaning we were “born with” the knowledge of God’s existence, because the idea of a supremely perfect being cannot be adventitious or factitious;

    Read More

  • John Locke: Innate Ideas And Perceptions Of The World

    997 Words  | 4 Pages

    Locke begins his essay, aptly named: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, by questioning Rene Descartes and his rationalist view of innate ideas. Descartes’ argument explaining innate ideas as being all our ideas stored in our minds and souls by a higher power, God, so that our thoughts are dependent on our mind to fulfil our purpose in life. Locke challenges this by pointing out that it does not make sense to have an innate idea about something if you have not perceived it yet (Locke, 1689). Locke then uses the example of children. If children have to learn as they develop and grow older then surely their knowledge is not innate, as according to Descartes, even a baby would have knowledge.

    Read More

More about Descartes First Meditation John Locke Analysis

Open Document