The word dharma derives its origins form the Sanskrit language but the exact renderings or meaning of this word cannot be pointed out. Dharma has many meanings. Many of the dictionary define dharma as ordinance, usage, duty, right, justice, morality, virtue, religion, good works, functions or characteristic. In Hindu jurisprudence the meaning of dharma, any a times is considered as “the privileges, duties and obligations of man, his standard of conduct as a member of the Aryan community and so on.” The code of Manu also makes use of the term dharma in the sense given above. To understand the concept of justice in ancient India it is essential understand the concept and actual meaning of the term dharma as understood by the ancient law givers …show more content…
The law of dharma has a definite end which can be reached when it is used as a sense of obligation to achieve its purpose of keeping the individuals within their ideals and assigned roles. The visible end of dhrma is in maintaining the status quo in the society and the absolute end of dharma is in helping the individual and providing him the opportunity to realize his ultimate goal of human existence. Manu believed that the ultimate goal of human existence is to realize ones nature. And to achieve this goal Manu puts forth the scheme of varna and ashrama. The concept of varna is based on the rational classification of the society into four groups according to the intellectual and physical capabilities, the four classes are brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya and sudra. Just like this the individual life is also divided into 4 ashrams- brahmacharya, grhastha, vanaprastha and sanyasa. Manu said that it throught he social order based on varna and ashrama that all the goals of a society as well as individual can be achieved. The ancient Indian legislators created policies for the welfare of all and the systems of varna and ashrama helped them in striking a balance between the societal and individual interest. The “varnashrama-dhrma” had two fold aims. One was to maintain harmony in the society and …show more content…
Manu says that the person who administers justice must also posses certain virtues, the most important of them being modesty and humility. According to Monu the king should be modest and always willing and ready to learn. He said the virtue of modesty and humility is capable of raising the social status of a man from lower to higher.
He said legal justice is the most important virtue and if we sacrifice this virtue then the whole social order would collapse. Also justice is a value both individual and public and is always seen as a manifestation of attitude of men towards others, because if there is only one man in the world then there would be no concept of fair or unfair, just or unjust. Justice is seen as attitude of an individual towards life and society.
This aspect of justice is also used in modern Indian legal philosophy which is relevant in relation to administration and appointment of judges, because judges should have dharma as moral part of their nature. The concept of justice in ancient Indian jurisprudence also carried in it the essential character of modern doctrines like “rule of law”, “doctrine of separation of power” concept of natural rights etc. principles of equity also kind of owe their origin to pure virtue.
c. Justice: As
Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. The word comes from the Latin word jus, meaning right or law. According to Kelsen (2000), Justice is primarily a possible, but not a necessary, quality of a social order regulating the mutual relations of men As a result of its importance, prominent and knowledgeable people have shared their views on justice and what it means and how the state is involved in its administration. The likes of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke among others have written extensively on the concept of justice.
King goes on to state, “Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.” This works because it gives these items something everyone can relate to or imagine. Like water, justice can be strong enough to change people. Justice is also natural and essential for people to thrive. And, finally, according to King, Justice is clear.
He is full of humility and loyalty, a virtue that is required to be exemplified by the
(48). She goes on to explain that other virtues can supersede benevolence, which provides proof that benevolence is not the ultimate end. “We find in our ordinary moral code many requirements and prohibitions inconsistent with the idea that benevolence is the whole of morality.” (48). If benevolence is not the overall end of morality, but instead the end of one virtue within morality, then it cannot be the basis for morality as a
Dharma is as described by Batchelor, “referring to the teachings of the Buddha as well as to those aspects of reality and experience with which his teachings are concerned, ‘Dharma practice’ refers to the way of life undertaken by someone who is inspired by such teachings” (xi). Later in the book he goes on to further explain that the goal of dharma practice is to free ourselves from the illusion of freedom and to let go of self-centered craving so that our lives become gradually more
Dharma is the duty a person must achieve in the time they live. Karma is based on your actions so if you have good actions, you will have good karma and if you
While most individuals reject the idea that a king’s authority reigns supreme, many individuals agree that authoritative figures do indeed hold a scared position, a position which requires respect and honor. The balance between the two lies in maintaining that the law, disregarding all the unjust aspects, necessitates obedience, and maintaining that the law only necessitates obedience when it does not go against one’s
Montana 1948: Justice and the Rule of Law According to Merriam-Webster, “justice” means the process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals. In the story of Montana 1948 the character David Hayden encounters many distinctive ways the law works than it would normally be displayed in the American Justice system.
Around 268 to 232 BCE, the Ashoka empire strongly encouraged Dharma because supposedly it was the way to happiness and the way to obtain love. In this civilization there were honors and benefits of following this belief and those who chose to accept the religion. If Dharma wasn’t followed there would be consequence but the only way to be happy would be to conform to the rest of what the empire thought was right. ‘The Edicts of Kings Asoka: An English Rendering’ tells about the beliefs of Ashoka and he think that “through [his own] instruction this regard for Dharma and love of Dharma has grown day by day… my officers high, low and middle rank are practicing and conforming to Dharma, and are capable of inspiring others to do the same.”
Throughout human history, Justice shows that it is a concept of involving people getting what they have of issues. Also, justice in the interests of safety and efficiency is an action in accordance with the requirements of some laws. In its narrow sense, justice is fairness. It is action that pays due regard to the proper interests, property, and safety of one's fellows. Some people maintain that justice stems from God's will or command while others believe that justice is inherent in nature itself.
Philosophers have debated the distinct subjects such as justice and happiness extensively. For instance, Plato discusses the subject of justice by arguing that justice is what allows people to live excellently. In contrast, Aristotle discusses happiness by arguing that acquiring virtues enables people to achieve the ultimate goal of happiness. What is the meaning of the terms justice and happiness? The term happiness could be elucidated as a satisfaction from goals achieved or from one’s status.
Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.
King addresses the characteristics of unjust laws in 3 points. First point being that just laws are always harmonious with natural morale law. Second point being that a just law is one that uplifts human personality as opposed to degrading human personality. Lastly, a just law can only be created in the most democratic manner possible and if it is not, the minority automatically has the right to disobey the law because they had no say in the creation of the law. As for the first point, a natural morale law must be measured by our natural human sense.
The concept of justice varies depending on the country, their cultures, and on individual people. Justice and mercy are important themes in The Merchant of Venice and are supported by quotes in the play; it is clearly seen that these two virtues cannot be achieved simultaneously. Justice calls for “an eye for an eye” and mercy asks for forgiveness and compassion towards the one who did wrong. Using examples from The Merchant of Venice, it can clearly be seen that these two human virtues can not be pursued at the same time. There are various definitions as to what justice truly is.
Natural justice is universal and unchanging (the Form) while conventional justice is based on convention or agreement and can be changed (the matter). According to him there are two kinds of conventional justice, namely distributive and corrective justice. Distributive justice means that those who are equal should be treated equally and those who are not equal should be treated unequally. This is the kind of justice that is used when distributing wealth, honor and other assets of the community. Corrective justice, on the other hand, is the kind of justice used by courts to correct an imbalance that has occurred.