Virginia and New Jersey are plans presented at constitutional convention. They give information about the structure of the government, representation of the congress, powers given to the congress and the composition of the government branches. There are several similarities between plans presented at constitutional convection by Virginia and the New Jersey plans. On the other hand there are differences between the two plans as illustrated below.
In both Virginia and New Jersey plan the structure of the government consist of the judiciary and executive branch, but in Virginia plan there is an additional plan known as the supreme legislature making up a total of three main branches of the government. This additional branch which is the legislature
…show more content…
In Virginia plan some of the specific powers include, that the national legislature to consent in all situations to which the separate states are unskilled or in which United States consistency may be disturbed by the claim of individual regulation and also assign inferior tribunals. The executive has the power to carry into execution of national laws, and to adverse any legislative act which shall not be passed after wards unless through permission from two third of each branch of national legislature. The judiciary has the power to handle all the circumstances regarding collection of national revenue, impeachment of any state, officers and questions that comprise of national coherence. In New Jersey plan some of the powers that are presented are partially similar to those in Virginia plans but not completely …show more content…
It is given the power to authorize collection of revenue just like in Virginia plan but in this case it’s done in different ways, where imposition of duties is put in to goods that are foreign ,imported in any part of united states.it also given the power to pass act of regulation of trade and commerce with external nations as well as with each other and amendment of mistake in both law and fact rendering judgment. All federal acts are instigated through the power of the executive and in addition appoint federal officers and direct the entire operations of the millitary.Its also given the power to appoint judges of the supreme tribunal that forms the judiciary just like in Virginia plan but in this plan the judges are appointed by the first branch of the legislature. The judiciary has the supremacy to attend and regulate instances that are first on all prosecutions of federal office.Inspite of this powers given there are some powers that are specifically denied in both plans. This are, none of the judiciary during the time of service in the office will be able to receive or hold any other office or position during their time of service in new jersey plan .The relationship between new federal government and states is that they both provide specific powers to the branches of their government which are in one way or another
Student’s name Professor’s name Course number Date The Virginia and New Jersey plans 1 The Virginia plan had various characteristics as proposed by Mr Randolph. He suggested in accordance to the wishes of the committee that the national government should be created and that it should consist of a supreme legislative, Executive and Judiciary. According to Mr. Patterson in the Virginia plan which he drew from Mr. Randolph’s propositions, proposed that revision of the articles of confederations was paramount in order to render federal constitution adequacy to the demands of both government and the union in preservation.
There were two major plans for government submitted by the states: the Virginia plan- A.K.A the Large States plan, and the New Jersey Plan- A.K.A the Small States Plan. The Virginia Plan was made to specifically benefit the large, slave-holding, southern states. It called for a bicameral legislature which would take a state’s population into account when selecting the number of senators and representatives for a state. This would have given massive power to the southern states which had large populations due to slaves as opposed to the free, northern states. In reply to this was the New Jersey Plan, which was unicameral and gave equal representation to each state regardless of population.
Edmund Randolph 1753-1813 By: Sahara Hundley Edmund Randolph was born near Williamsburg, Virginia on August 10th, 1753 to Ariana Jennings and John Randolph. Randolph studied law under his father and attended the College of William and Mary. He became a notable law practitioner in Virginia thereafter. He was an aide-de-camp, or assistant, to General George Washington.
In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own state constitution, which includes the basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, state constitution is relatively more detailed than the national constitution. The purpose of this essay is to analyze and compare the similarities and differences of the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution, emphasizing in three branches of government: legislative branches, executive branches, and judicial branches. First of all, both the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution divide government into three branches in accordance with the concept of separation of powers. However, the compositions of the three branches are different
These men being known as the founding fathers The Virginia plan was to create a government consisted of what Edmond Randolph proposed that the national government be compiled of a supreme, legislative, executive and judiciary. It was also consisted of 2 houses. The lower house would represent states with the largest population. The members of the upper house would be elected by the lower house making the smaller states have little or no representation in the upper house at all.
In May 25, 1787, a convention was called in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to express the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, the intention from many delegates was to draft a new constitution; create a new government rather than fix the existing one. Rhode Island was the only one of the 13 original states to refuse to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention. At the Convention, the first issues they had to address was the representation in Congress.
The two plans that were presented was the The Virginia Plan and The New Jersey Plan. The Virginia plan was drafted by James Madison. While he waited for a an appropriate number of delegates to gather at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Virginia plan gave all power to the government. The New Jersey Plan was a proposal to structure the United States Government which was presented by William Paterson also at the Constitutional Convention 1787.
On 1787, a constitutional convention was held in Philadelphia state house, where three proposal were suggested: the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise. The Virginia Plan intention was to establish a Congress with numerical representation and a more robust national government; however, this proposition led into an opposed proposal called The New Jersey plan. The New Jersey plan was made to make modification to the Articles of Confederation but more importantly, the plan is to make clear of whom has the power of what states. Two delegates from Connecticut were joined together to acquire the image only by the states in senate and numbers in the House, calling it the Connecticut Compromise. As all the Plans I previously mentioned, I will go on depth on how the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise shape America today.
The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.
Claim A: Under the Virginia Plan, the population would determine representation in each of the two houses of Congress. Claim B: Delegates from less-populous states wanted to amend the Articles of Confederation to protect their equal standing, which would preserve each
Obviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.
From the articles of 55 to 66, they explained the structure of the outcome that came from the Connecticut Compromise, the House of Representatives and the Senate(Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, 1788 Federalist Paper). It further discussed the election methods, terms of re-election, and their duties. In this section of the articles, the Federalist Papers was mainly add on more details and restrictions onto the conclusion that draw from the Connecticut Compromise, with the legislative structure of the House of Representative and the Senate. The New Jersey Plan along with the Virginia Plan made out the Connecticut Compromise, which had perfected the US Constitution with justice and rights to
The US Constitution vs. The NJ Constitution The Constitution of the United States of America is what ensures the people have to freedom to do with their lives as they want. What many don’t know, is each state has its own Constitution that cater to the individual states. The New Jersey Constitution is made so ‘all persons are by nature free and independent’ and much more. It is important to realize both nation and state constitution are a vital part of our everyday lives.
In the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.
The governor of Florida is more powerful than West Virginia’s although their term limits and power checks are similar. The Florida Judicial Branch is set up differently than West Virginia’s; The State Supreme Court is the highest court, followed by The District Court of Appeals, The Circuit Court, and then the County Court system. Florida’s Legislative Branch is made up of 120 House of Representative members and 40 Senate