Political knowledge is needed to be president and not everyone has the political knowledge that is needed. Being president involves an endless amount of work and not everyone can put in the amount of work it takes to be president. William Taft had the political knowledge and effort that it takes to be president, although that was not his dream. Taft fulfilled his wife’s dream by being president, but he was not happy while serving as president. While Taft served as president he made major accomplishments, but he was not truly happy until he became chief
The advantage of a two parties system is a strong central government and constant pressure toward the center. Some Americans think that this creates a system where you can project strength in military and economic policy. This has also allowed the US to prosper and sometimes dominate in world affairs to the point of “empire”. At the moment, with Citizens United (CU) in place, I feel there is no viable hope for any third-party presidential candidate to run a successful campaign. CU affects the entire political campaign process
But recently gerrymandering has become more controversial because people feel that it has taken away their rights as a voter and it swings the votes to one side by a big percentage. Current cases are before the courts to decide if gerrymandering is legal. Some states have been discussing whether it should still be allowed during elections. “Many efforts are underway to remedy this political
The president of the United States is of utmost importance to the nation’s progress and success, both domestically and internationally. Hence, it follows that presidential elections are quite a popular event on a national level. Since the nation’s creation in 1776, it was clear that the president must be chosen wisely as well as fairly in order to preserve a democratic character in the United States and also to ensure an incapable president is note elected by the people. The solution that followed in response to these considerations was the establishment of the Electoral College, a method of indirect election of the president and his or her running mate for the vice presidency. The Electoral College establishes a group of electors who pledge to vote for the candidate of a specific political party.
Redistricting has been a cause of debate for many years in the United States. The process of manipulating the boundaries of voting districts for party or class gain is as old as our nation. In 1788, Gerrymandering was already being used by Patrick Henry to put James Madison at a disadvantage in the race for presidency (Barasch). Although certain rules are in place – like how districts must be contiguous and and compact – there is little said about the actual process of redistricting in the constitution, which is why redistricting has been taken so wildly out of its constitutional context through the centuries. Many states and activist groups have tried to reform the redistricting process, but only twenty-one states utilize a non-partisan commission
You have probably heard his name already. Yes, it’s none but Donald J. Trump. Donald J. Trump is running for the most powerful office of the world, the President of the United States of America. Generally, if we imagine an image of the President of United States, what do we think? May be a polite person who makes a cautious speech every time he speaks.
This was just one of his strategies to bring America back together, and showed even more of his strong leadership skills. "One of the little known leadership styles that Lincoln used to his advantage...was his appointment of talented national figures from opposing parties to be part of his cabinet," (Stone 4). He had members from the loyal opposition inform him of the issues on each side. This strategie is what made him one of the best presidents, as he was mature, and did not let his personal views make him one-sided. Without a doubt, Abraham Lincolns best known contribution was the erosion of slavery.
With the person elected having morally questionable views about these people being the face of our country, how will the youth react? Will the begin to adopt the opinions that many adults of today have, including the person they look up to to lead them? Our elected president will potentially cause a sectional divide across the country, much like leading up to the civil war. Is this not concerning? A nation divided against itself cannot stand.
citizen which in my case i am not a U.S. citizen. That would be a big time disqualification for me because i was born in a different country. Even though I am not a U.S citizen, I would not change that in order to become a U.S. president. I believe a person from out of state could be a good president but it would just take away the point of having an american citizen run their American Country. I do believe the role of a president should be taken seriously but the requirement could someday get modified.
They follow what their heart says and chooses that answer. They stay humble by not bragging about their accomplishments. Especially, becoming the president of the United States of America. Secondly, another example of a good president is an intelligent one. A president needs to be smart to make the right decisions.
The system allows the election of a minority president. In this situation the loser of the popular vote wins the electoral vote. According to the "winner take all" method in which the candidate who receives the majority of the votes in the state wins all of its Electors, it is possible for the candidate to become the president even without having the popular vote. This is also the case of the 2016 presidential elections. In this case Donald Trump passed 270 electoral college votes but Hillary Clinton received more popular votes.
With the Electoral College people are “Ignoring New York, California and Texas or nearly 30% of the population”(Passage 3) People may not even get to choose who they vote for. With the electoral vote it makes states like Ohio more important than Rhode Island because it is a “swing state.” The process for the Electoral College is not even the same in some of the states because each state has it’s own rules. It also makes elections so much more complicated than it needs to be. The Electoral College takes away power from the people, and that is the foundation that this country was supposed to be built on. The Electoral College should be discontinued because it gets rid of the people’s power that they have in the nation, it makes makes it so that every vote is an important vote, and the whole Electoral College system is messed up since each state has their own rules.
Many people choose not to vote in an election due to the fact that their vote is not effective in influencing the outcome of an election. This system of voting within the electoral college also generally favours large states over small states, meaning that they also do not have much influence in an election turnout. This problem requires reform because not only does it underrepresent the minority opinion, there is also a possibility that the winner might not be the candidate with the most popular votes. In fact three U.S Presidents, Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, and George W. Bush in 2000, were elected with fewer popular votes, only winning the election because of the electoral votes they received. In the 2000 presidential election, George W. Bush’s 271 electoral college victory over Al Gore’s 266, prompted renewed calls for reforming the electoral college.
Most of the states are not “bound by state law and/or by state or party pledge to cast their vote for the candidate that wins the statewide popular vote...” Some states use laws such as California’s State Law – § 6906 but, “Twenty-seven states have laws on the books that require electors to vote for their party 's candidate if that candidate gets a majority of the state 's popular vote. In 23 states, no such laws apply…” (Soni) In what is now twenty-one states some being Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware and many more no such law forces the electors to pick the majority vote’s candidate. There have been cases in which the electoral vote completely disavows the people’s votes such as, in the year 2000 George W. Bush lost the popular vote to Al Gore by .51% he ended up still winning due to an electoral outcome of 271 to 266. This is also not the only time this has happened in the United States history books, using the Electoral College
Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? What were they thinking? In order to balance the needs of states and give voting power to those deemed trustworthy, the founding fathers developed the Electoral College system. Thus, each state was entrusted with a specific amount of electoral votes to cast in the presidential election. Is our voting system fair?