Embryonic Stem Cell Research Persuasive Speech

But, if no spare embryo is created and the original embryo is tested and not implanted because it is damaged by the procedure, it is also a waste of human potential. Even more people don’t support cloning because of the rights that all humans, both born and yet to be born, have. One of these is a right to have parents, or to have genes from two individuals. However, this argument is based off of the misconception that many people have, which is that a clone is the child of a nucleus donor. In fact, they are the donor’s twin sibling and have the same genetic parents as the donor.

Another problem is that the scissors component of the system can hang around in the cell and later on, when you think you’re done, it starts snipping away. The term ‘gene editing’ helps people understand how the technology works, but it also suggests a level of precision and safety that at least for now isn’t there.” Furthermore, some people may need to use another women’s egg for this process, whether to replace their egg or to have in addition to their egg. Three-parent babies are human offspring with three genetic parents, created through a specialized form of in vitro fertilization in which the future baby's mitochondrial DNA comes from a third party. The

If come across any informalities that it seems like a baby may have a ultrasound, a doctor would be able to do a fatal operation, to clarify or deny the original findings. On the other hand, I don’t think that everyone should be able to know the gender of their child as they will make that the main factor of the child entering this world. Some countries should make more laws against knowing the gender as they do in an unethical way and should be stopped. For others who don’t take advantage of it, they should have every right to know the gender and health status of the

Because animal tests are so unreliable, they make those human trials all the more risky” (“Animal Testing is a Bad Science” 1). Once the experiments with the animals are completed, clinical trials start on humans and they are the first set of people to be tested. Not only are there going to be a set of people that are the first to be tested on, but barely any drugs work in clinical trials. “Ninety-two percent of drugs—those that have been tested on animals and in vitro—do not make it through Phase 1 of human clinical trials” (“Medical Testing on Animals is Cruel and Unnecessary” 3). So, even if we do test on animals, humans eventually have to be tested on and the drug successes on the animals didn’t work on humans.

Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment. This amendment declared that no government funding would go towards anything that results in or could cause the destruction of embryos.

When people think about cloning they often imagen frightening human beings being created in some mad scientist experiment. Many barely know that cloning has been studied for decades and respect scientist from all over the world discovered many benefits for the humankind. “A clone is a genetic copy of another organism”(Cloning Questions). However, there are two types of cloning: reproductive and therapeutic. Basically, the difference between the two is that in reproductive the cloned embryo is implanted in the womb and is going to develop into an organism and in the therapeutic, the embryo will never develop beyond a chunk of cells.

Everyone is entitled to choose their own lifestyle, whether they want to have a child or not. Some females who seek to have children find it easy, although some are unfortunate. There are numerous of reasonings, such as being too old to be pregnant, damage to the Fallopian tube or uterus and cancer radiation or chemotherapy. As our generation goes on, many discoveries revolving biology is produced and one of it is the "In Vitro Fertilization". It is the procedure of fertilization where they save sperm sample, take an egg from the women and physically combining it in a laboratory dish where the egg and the sperm is now called an embryo.

The discussion on whether parents have the right to decide on the use of embryonic stem cells that are attained from their new born baby is quite an open question considering the fact that it touches religious and societal morals as a whole. The study of embryonic stem cells has taken a turn for better as scientists and they have captured the imaginations of scientists and non-scientists and has sparked a debate on whether or not attaining the stem cells in units and storing them for use on humans to help treat human beings from their illnesses and diseases and possibly rid the world of certain diseases. The two opposing sides have two different views on the way that this study should be approached. This essay will touch base on both views of the different sides and draw a conclusion from the result. Embryonic stem cells are cells that can be taken from embryos that have been fertilized through in vitro fertilization.

Should Taxpayer Money Go Towards Cloning? If therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning are both dangerous then why allow it in human and animal cloning? Cloning is the process of producing similar populations of genetically identical individuals. “95% of cloning have resulted in failures.” Therapeutic cloning can be replacing old organs on to someone or something else. Reproductive cloning is cloning a whole new human body.

For example, a couple who are carriers of genetic disease usually have a one in the four risk of transmitting the disease to the offspring. Therefore, they can choose to clone the embryo rather than having the offspring with that disease. Furthermore, human cloning enables the duplication of individuals of great traits. Parents able to screen their future baby for modify or select the baby genetic makeup. They can choose the traits such as intelligence, height, hair colour, skin colour and else.

fend for themselves, despite being relatives to one of the most important individuals’ in cell-line history. Now, knowing the full potential of these cells, the question arises of why the Lacks family was not told of the cells by the scientists themselves. Many possibilities arise, but the main one is that the existence of the cells would have gone against the wishes of the family. The sample of the tumor was taken before Henrietta died, but permission to perform tests was only requested after her death. Additionally, the permission was initially not granted by Day, her husband, to perform any additional test on her body.