As long as the criminal is still alive, they are still capable of killing or hurting someone . Putting a criminal in prison makes the government look more sympathetic towards the criminal than the victim. The government needs to send out a strong message that they will not tolerate such crimes and they won't let them get away with it, prison time is enough to stop most people, but for some people a stronger reason is needed. Having a functional death penalty law will help protect the public from society’s worst
The execution of a life has always been one of the most harsh forms of punishment from the beginning of time. Though the capital punishment is widely accepted for people that commit crimes such as murders, rape, or bombings, the death penalty is still unfair in some cases. The death penalty still is not the right form of punishment because it is unfair to selective races and social statuses and in some cases, it is too merciful. Numerous cases and events could prove that the death penalty has always been biased towards certain groups of people. This is true considering that the rich white man has a smaller chance of getting the death penalty than the impoverished colored man.
Firstly, death teaches the convicted nothing. He who committed the crime is sentenced to death and not given the chance to think through his/her miscarriages of justice. However, a person is never executed immediately, therefore they are given a sufficient amount of time to not only fear their fate but also rethink their actions and misdoings. Notwithstanding, capital punishment, however much feared, won 't necessarily dissuade criminals to continue committing crimes. This may be because the perpetrator is either psychotic and enjoys committing felonies or the offender simply doesn 't fear death.
So, in such instances when a person has no will to live, the loss of life penalty does not deter them in any respect. If we are seeing that the death penalty is not running a roadblock to people committing crimes, then what is the purpose of it. A better deterrent is wanted which might make the offender less likely to give in to a life of crime. If this type of deterrent become observed then criminals could have second thoughts of committing the crime due to the fact they could think that they may get caught. Criminals who plan their crimes very cautiously, might not be deterred with the aid of the death sentence because they might trust that they might not be
The capital punishment is identified as the most radical means of punishment that is aimed at decreasing the number of the murders and other severe crimes that can happen on the streets. However, it is still not proven that the death penalty is effective in terms of reducing the crime rates. As the opponents of the capital punishment claim, “essential objectives the death penalty is meant to serve—crime control, deterrence and retribution—can be achieved without it, and are often not achieved with it” (Šimonović 183). First of all, the death penalty does not perform its main function as a means of punishment directed at the correction of the criminals. Furthermore, through the capital punishment, it is possible to take only one criminal off the streets while others will
While some may say it seems barbaric to still have a death penalty, the U.S. says it 's used as a crime deterrent. While the thought of death may be a deterrent, it 's typically not thought about during the forbidden actions, meaning that its actually not barbaric enough. The death penalty is ineffective, because its main purposes are to give some consolation to the victim 's family, and to be a crime deterrent. The main problem with this is that it doesn 't work at all as a crime deterrent. According to “Study: 88% of criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent” in 2008 88.2% of criminologists surveyed did not believe that the death penalty is effective.
There is no evidence that the death penalty prevents crimes from happening. Abolishing the death penalty will save money and keep innocent people from dying. Conclusion Three strikes laws, the war on drugs, lack of rehabilitation programs and mandatory minimum sentences have caused the prison overcrowding problem in the United States. Furthermore, the death penalty is not a solution to crime and cost society. Rehabilitation is key to preventing prison overcrowding, preventing future crimes, and offenders becoming a successful citizen in
In each year, there are lots of rape case in our society. Most of people may think that the death penalty can decrease the crime rates in the society because the death penalty is the way to prevent people from being the criminal. It is like the proverb which said, drawing a tiger to scare the cattle. This can be the factor that made people afraid of doing crime. Then, arresting
The more the individual perceives legal sanctions as severe, the greater is the perceived cost of crime and thus the probability of deterrence (Dr. Kirk Williams, Ph.D. in Philosophy from University of Arizona, 1987). What is more, incapacitation directly proves the rationality of retribution. According to Dr. David Green, Ph.D. in Economics at University of Newcastle, (2006), crime levels fall when more offenders have been sent to prison. Statistics show the average inmate committed 140 crimes in the 12 months before his admission into custody. If we locked up 10,000 more offenders a year, we could prevent 1.4 million offenses, saving a fortune and reducing aggravation for citizens.