Stephen Nathanson Capital Punishment

281 Words2 Pages

Capital Punishment Punishment is the imposition of a penalty as retribution for a crime, and the retribution deserves those who do the crime. The main idea of this chapter is whether the killer deserves to die or not, and we ought to kill them or not. Stephen Nathanson argues against the punishment that leads to execution. He said that the actual and moral beliefs based on the death penalty are wrong and must be repealed. Many people said that the death penalty is the best way to deter murder and thus save lives. However, he said it is not a better deterrent than life jail. Jeffery Reiman also rejects the death penalty, and he has shown that it is not fair to punish killers less cruelty. Some people said that the death penalty prevents

Show More
Open Document