Judicial independence assures that judges will have the capacity to make laws and settle on choices free of impact and in light of the law. Judges play a crucial role in Canadian democracy. The judicial branch of government constitutes the court system of Canada formally known as "the Queen on the Bench”, and is made up of many courts. It differs in levels based on legal superiority and is separated by jurisdiction. There are federal court as well as provincial or municipal courts.
The Judge is considered to be the Judge, a public officer selected to administer, uphold the laws in a courtroom and to make the final decision of cases based upon the appropriate laws. Some functions maintained and handed down by the judge are: issuing warrants, making courtroom determinations, setting and denying bails, presiding over cases and ruling over motions. The Judge is appointed to the bench by the State. The Judge presides over all of the Courts in the United States: • The United States Supreme Court • Twelve Circuit Courts of
A list containing the names of these three nominees have to be presented to the president, who has twenty days to make a selection for the position of appellate judgeship. The list is presented to the governor in case of selection at the state level. The same mechanism is followed by the state appellate courts, for the appointment at the federal appellate level, from which four-fifths of the seats are filled by judges of first instance and the rest are filled by lawyers and state public
Even though it is a hard job it is a very important role in society and a highly respected occupation. Becoming a federal judge takes many talents and skills that are hard to attain. One great talent to have is courage and integrity to make the right decisions in and out of the courtroom. A federal judge should also be honest and responsible. You cannot become a judge if you are dishonest and disobeying the law.
Judges have the power to give new meaning to statues and cases on a case-by-case method. And on top of this, the judges are not even elected by the people directly; the President nominates individuals to become justices. Of course, once a justice takes office, they are guaranteed a spot on the bench for life, regardless of national public opinion. This means that we have nine unelected people with no term limits and no direct accountability to the people providing answers to some of the most controversial federal issues. But the Supreme Court’s power is surprisingly more overreaching.
The Electoral College Since the founding of our country, the Electoral College system has been used to determine our President. Established by the founding fathers in the constitution as a compromise between the election of the President through congress and through the popular vote, the Electoral College has become a point of contention for many people across the U.S. This system designates a number of electoral votes per state, and a majority of 270 out of 538 votes are needed to be elected (U.S. Electoral College). As of 2016, only 41% of adults in the United States feel the Electoral College should remain in use (Dutton).
It is also very important because it allows the supreme court of the country to check the decisions of the lower courts of the country and it also helps to check on the legislative and the executive branch of the government. The most important thing that judicial review do is the protection of the rights of the individuals and it create a balance between the powers of the government and maintain equality to every person. If there is no judicial review then the system of civil liberties would be very different. Types of Decisions in Judicial Review The court can give three types of decisions after the judicial review is conducted and the decisions are as follows: 1. The law is unconstitutional.
To overcome this problem, our Courts have developed the practice of appointing ‘fact-finding commissions’ on a case-by-case basis which are deputed to inquire into the subject-matter of the case and report back to the Court. These commissions usually consist of experts in the concerned fields or practicing lawyers. In matters involving complex legal considerations, the Courts also seek the services of senior counsels
In view of the report in 2009; it has been laid down that judges should be diverse, from various backgrounds and life experiences to have different point of views on various legal issues. UK’s current system is the evolution product of 1,000 years and is still changing to meet the needs of the society. Although UK”s current judicial appointment is supported, several people believe that that change should be brought, current judges are selected solely on the basis of “merit”. Some argues that the system consists of white males with similar backgrounds. One would definitely mention about the 2012 case; that of the controversial selection of Jonathan Sumption to sit in the Supreme Court.
We don’t want to be categorized based on how someone views us or sees us we want to be us and that is why we hate when people think they know who we are when they really don’t. Therefore of course sometimes if may be wrong but humans are wrong sometimes and the jury system is