Is the Gospel of Matthew a Reliable Biography of Jesus?
The Gospels have been accused of not being reliable and incorrect for many years now. Skeptics and naturalists alike have tried to come up with reasons as to how the Gospels are not reliable biographies of Jesus. Of course, there has been no significant or specific evidence to the unreliability of the Gospels. However, there is much evidence proving the reliability of the Gospels.
The Gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew Levi, a tax collector who became one of Jesus’ disciples. It is supposed that Matthew was written between 60 and 70 A.D. Only 30 to 40 years after Jesus’ death! Now, when we look at the length of time between the death of Jesus’ and when Matthew was written, it is in fact a short time interval compared to other historical biographies. The biographies of Alexander the Great were
…show more content…
Does this mean that the Gospels contradict each other? No, it doesn’t. As Patrick Zukeran states, “Imagine if four people wrote a biography on your life: your son, your father, a co-worker, and a good friend. They would each focus on different aspects of your life and write from a unique perspective.” In the same way, the Gospels each wrote on different aspects of Jesus’ life and they each had their own perspective. Matthew chose to focus more on trying to understand the relationship between Christianity and Judaism. He focuses on how Jesus is the son of God, is the King, and is the promised Savior. Matthew also leaves out some stories that the other Gospels contain. However, these are not contradictions. They are simply not a part of the perspective of the Gospel of Matthew. Also, there are some passages that have different wording than other Gospels. These, too, are not contradictions, because they are simply just a part of Matthew’s unique
Also the version of Jesus presented in the Synoptic Gospels is different from the Gospel of John. He speaks very little about himself; he is focused on the coming of the Kingdom of God. Prior to this unit I considered all the Gospels to
Jesus asked Judas why he would act like his friend in kissing him, when in actuality Judas
Van Biema presents several ideas that to him prove that those four gospels are unreliable and cannot be trusted. Van Biema presents a critical view point
Seemingly, both men are simply following the wishes of the divine. Jesus has been sent down to Earth by the Lord to “save his people from their sins” [Matthew 1: 21]. His entire life is devoted to spreading the word of God, and he is ultimately crucified so that all have the opportunity to live in the Kingdom of God. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus is constantly giving thanks to the Lord and reminding those around him that the miracles that are being performed are done so out of God’s grace.
Not only this, Judah never called Jesus "son of the God" as other disciples do, but instead of “teacher”, because he thinks Jesus was just a teacher. When other apostles disclosed their faithfulness of Jesus, Judas still has remained silent (John 6:68, 11:16)
Life of Saint Athanasius Saint Athanasius spent over seventeen years being banned from his own country by four different emperors. There were many great theologians and Church fathers, but Athanasius was one of the most important Church Fathers in ecclesiastical history. Saint Athanasius of Alexandria was born in 293. He was a theologian, ecclesiastical statesman, and a leader of Egypt. He had a lot of enemies, and defended against heresies.
The word “critical” often conjures the incorrect image of negativity. If the Four Gospels are to be analysed critically would this study find loopholes only? This need not be the case, as the Four Gospels, and the Bible as a whole, has withstood the test of time. As a stand-alone text, the Bible has proven its accuracy in its portrayal of events, its authorship, and its date of writing. Though scholars have tried to use both textual and literary criticism to discredit the Four Gospels, there are an equal number of scholars, using these same tools, who have proved that the Four Gospels have an accurate portrayal of events.
The Bible is so detailed that every person has a different view for every
Regardless of how the Gospel of Matthew illustrates the same story, it is an unknown fact whether the disciples literally got into the boat or not. Matthew specifically states, “but by this time the boat, battered by the waves, was far from the land for the wind was against them” (14:24). Unlike Mark where Jesus alone on the land truly saw that they were “straining at the oars against the adverse wind” (6:48). With clarity, in Mark it states that the disciples were in the boat and struggling against an adverse wind but in Matthew it states that the boat was being battered by the waves, and far from the land; not stating if the disciples were definitely in the boat and out at sea. The problem now, is that if in Matthew’s gospel the disciples were not in the boat but were still on land because of the wind, this reveals the fact that the disciples did not listen to Jesus.
These disciples were all honest men who sought the salvation of souls, the fullness of virtue, and the will of Jesus Christ. This conclusion is evident from their writings: they detested evil, promoted virtue, warned of falsities in the spirit and of the flesh, and endured persecution. One historian said, “I willingly believe historians whose witnesses are willing to suffer death and persecution for the truth of their testimony” (Laux 69). These epistles and other books of the New Testament were honestly written by followers of Christ, which is evident by their lives and
Most of Jesus's life is told through the four Gospels of the New Testament Bible, known as the Canonical gospels, written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. These are not biographies in the modern sense but accounts with allegorical intent. They are written to engender faith in Jesus as the Messiah and the incarnation of God, who came to teach, suffer and die for people’s sins. Jesus was born around 4 B.C. in Bethlehem. His mother, Mary, was a virgin who was betrothed to Joseph, a carpenter.
Everyone knows the gospels are very important to the Catholic Church, But why? We read them at mass every Sunday so they must have a deeper meaning. Well that’s just it. They teach about Jesus’ life on earth, his death and resurrection. They might differ from each other but that is because they were written by four different authors.
Matthew, the first gospel in the New Testament, utilizes an interesting formula of fulfillment when compared to other New Testament writings. Detractors have lobbed fiery darts at this formula, claiming that it displays bias and inaccuracy. This, however, comes from a misunderstanding of what Matthew is attempting to portray to his audience. Jewish Hellenists were the likely audience that Matthew had in mind when he wrote his account. Resulting from this, he wishes to provide them with insurmountable proof of Jesus Christ being the promised Messiah of the Old Testament.
Furthermore this account of the priests’ and elders’ deception provides Matthew with an explanation for why many Jewish people never became believers after the