On the date of August 4, 1892 Andrew and Abby Borden were axe murdered in their home, Lizzie should be guilty because she was the only person in the house during the time of the murders in about a 90 minute period of time, The dust in the barn was undisturbed, and she burned the dress ( Evidence). To begin, Lizzie claimed that during the fifteen minutes in which Andrew Borden was murdered in the living room, “Excepting the two or three minutes you were down cellar, where you away from the house until your father came in?” stated in the lizzie borden inquest (Page #5) during her questioning, Yet she said she was in the cellar during Andrew Borden’s death
In addition Lizzie claimed “I went out to the barn. I don't know what time he
“August 4, 1892, Andrew and Abby Borden are murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts.” Chery Eddy Lizzie Borden is arrested for the murder of her father and stepmother. ... Lizzie Borden was found not guilty But I think that she was. The first reason, I think lizzie borden was the murderer because of the suspicious behavior before and after the murder. A clean, handle-free hatchet blade was found in the basement, which was the only reason it was suggested murder weapon.
It seems unusual that a woman would choose to wait alone in a house if she thought a murderer still might be in the neighborhood on the loose. Furthermore, On the night before the murders, Lizzie went to visit Alice Russell ( a neighbor), and told her that she was worried that some unknown enemy of her father's might try to kill him soon. As a result, this convinced me to believe that Lizzie Borden was the only possible culprit for the murders of her
In August 1892, one of the most disastrous murderers occurred that is still yet to be solved. Andrew Jackson Borden and Abby Durfee Borden were a married couple in the 19th century. They were suddenly murdered with an ax and were given multiple whacks to the head. Lizzie Borden, daughter of the two victims, still remains as the only suspect that committed the murderers. For this reason, Lizzie Borden is guilty.
I read through all the witness testimonies and Lizzie Borden is guilty let me tell you why. All these testimonies mentioned something that made her look guilty. here’s why, she changed the story way too much, Lizzie Borden burned a really big piece of evidence, she also could have been jealous of her stepmother because her father bought her stepmother Abby Borden a house. Lizzie Borden seems to change her answers a lot in the very last document. Let me explain to you why she is guilty.
A local drug store owner had said that the day before the murders Lizzie had tried to buy a poison from the store and he would not allow her, since back in that day that is how women would kill people. Lizzie during the time of her trial was found burning a dress that she claimed had a paint stain on it. Lizzie had feminists on her side saying that she was being prosecuted for no reason. Later on in her trial she had paid the ex-governor of Massachusetts as her lawyer. Lizzie Borden was acquitted on June 20, 1893.
The only one in the house at the time was Lizzie Borden. Also, they found no evidence that someone came in and just murdered mr. and mrs. Borden. Another reason why I think she committed the murder was because she was having conflict with her mother All in all, Lizzie had to have been guilty because she had the most evidence out of everybody else that was considered a suspect.
Is Lizzie Andrew Borden Guilty? I have a very simple answer, yet rather a complex answer to that. Most people in this day an age believe that she was guilty. Now, why out of everyone in the town of Fall River would you choose this poor innocent lady who supposedly loved her parents so much that she hacked her mother 18 times and her father 11. She brutally and viciously murdered her own parents in all under 2 hours.
She had been taken into questioning on June 1893. An all-male jury deliberated and returned saying that she was not guilty but can we really trust an all-male jury group? They obviously would not say she guilty because she was a women and they wouldn’t do something to her to make her go to jail. In my opinion, I strongly believe that Lizzie Borden is guilty of killing both her parents because she attempted to buy prussic acid, she burned a dress that supposedly had paint on it, and the ‘nursery rhyme” even states what could have actually happened during the times of the murders. Lizzie had much reasons to be blamed for this.
In Fall River a girl that goes by Lizzie Borden killed her parents out of anger and rage. This was a planned murder due to family friction and the relationship in the family. It seems apparent that Lizzie Borden killed her parents due to a bad relationship and friction between the three. Lizzie Borden killed her parents over a fit of range and an insecure mindset to be thinking. For example, she had a bad home life and relationship with her family members.
Lizzie Borden is Guilty Many cases were named “Trials of the 19th Century”. Lizzie Borden’s trial was one of them. Lizzie was put on trial for the murder of her father and step mother.
I have done enough research to know that there are three reasons why Lizzie didn’t commit this hideous crime. There were other people home at the time of the murder. The night before the murder John Morse, the uncle, showed up unexpectedly. In her statement to the police, Lizzie was outside at the time of the murder, so she wasn’t in the
Lizzie and her parents had a strong, devoted, and long-standing relationship, making a motive for murder unlikely. There is no incriminating evidence such as blood found on Lizzie. In addition, other possible suspects
For one, there was no physical evidence linking Lizzie to the murders, and no murder weapon was ever found. Furthermore, there were conflicting witness statements about Lizzie's whereabouts at the time of the murders, which suggested that she may not have been in the house when they occurred. Finally, Lizzie had no prior history of violence or criminal behavior, which made it difficult to believe that she would suddenly become a cold-blooded killer. So, was Lizzie Borden guilty or innocent?
The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, suggests that often the primary response to one's own fault is to blame another individual. In the playwright, a young girl, Abigail Williams, is found to be dancing and conjuring spirits with her friends in the woods, going against the town’s religious beliefs. Immediately after getting exposed, Abigail attempts to put the blame on their servant Tituba, whom she knows cannot dispute the claim. Her insolence and lies cause an undesirable chain reaction that puts the town into a state of chaos and terror. Eventually, she is forced to flee town or risk considerable punishment for the havoc she caused by her deception and fabrication.
In Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation it states that “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders” There was no evidence that she did the murders. They didn't question anybody but Lizzie. Anyone could have done it. This just proves that Lizzie did not do