Mahatma Karamchand Gandhi was a humanitarian who used peaceful topics to fight for the freedom of India. He walked 250 miles from his Ashram to Dandi, a coast off of Eastern India. He then proceeded to pick up a lump of salt, thereby defying British Law. This story leads us to ask the question, why did Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? Basically, he could convince the people to join him instead of killing off nonbelievers. He also because of how crippled Britain was, and the fact that his base of followers was so devoted and big. These three reasons combined were the main reasons that Gandhi won freedom for his country.
“It was inevitable that Britain should some day refuse to rule India and that India should some day refuse to be ruled.” Mahatma Gandhi is known as one of the 20th century’s most influential people and is seen in India as the Father of the Nation. How he achieved such status was through his attempts at protest, negotiation and non cooperation through his philosophy of Satyagraha to better the lives of the Indian people. While in the end his policies got the job done, one can ask if unwavering nonviolence really was the most effective way at ousting the British from India. Though failed non cooperation movements show Gandhi’s policy as being somewhat ineffective, analysis of the of the Salt March, its results and the way that Gandhi was able to rally followers show its importance. Gandhi’s policy of Satyagraha was in fact the most effective method of gaining India’s independence from Britain.
Gandhi people manage their anger and have peace against the British. He did this by creating a philosophy and encouraging people to follow that philosophy. Gandhi also used peace instead of violence against the British. Gandhi did this because he believed that he can achieve peace among everybody. Gandhi’s philosophy didn't work on everyone. He expected people to take on the British peacefully instead of violently. Mahatma Gandhi was a great human rights activist when the British and believed that everyone should be equal.
Gandhi tied his political and religious beliefs together and represented himself as an advocate for piece. For this reason he rejected the idea of teaming workers struggles with a campaign for British withdrawal, and thus was worried about workers and rank-and-file soldiers combining in action, as things would become very violent. Although he opposed one caste oppressing another he never in fact came out directly for the abolition of the caste system himself. Pacifists cite Gandhi as the shining example of how non-violent civil disobedience works successfully. Yet, as an advocate for non-violence he publically pledged not to embarrass the British, and that he would lend moral support for the Allies. This should have been in conflict in his beliefs, and therefore should not have supported
Gandhi created a revolution of change in India. He had an enormous impact that forever that vibrant country, and he did it all with nonviolence. Gandhi led people and taught them to stand up for themselves and in the process made India a free and independent country. The unfair treatment would no longer stand, it was time for change. The nonviolence policy worked because Gandhi did not give in, he accepted punishment and responsibility, and his followers were loyal.
Even though Gandhi was small in size his impact on India’s independence was tremendous. Gandhi has shown moral courage in fighting for India 's independence. Secondly, when fighting for India 's independence, he used non-violent protesting. Finally, because he used non-violence, his moral courage cost him his life. By examining in Gandhi’s fight for India’s independence, non-violent protesting, and his moral courage costing him his life, it is clear that he was a beautiful and courageous man, that fought for what he believed in.
Mahatma Gandhi also wanted Indian independence from the British. He wanted everyone to treat each other like brothers and sisters no matter what religion they had. All in all, he wanted equality, freedom, peace, and love.
Mohandas Gandhi is one of the greatest nonviolent activists ever. Gandhi came up with the word ahimsa, which meant nonviolence. He also introduced to the world the word satyagraha, which meant peaceful civil disobedience. In 1930 Gandhi and a group of followers began a march of more than 200 miles. Three and a half weeks later they made it to their destination, the sea. At the sea, Gandhi picked up a handful of salt. This act went against the British law mandating that they buy salt from their government and this law did not allow them to collect their own salt. That act was made to let the British government know that the Indian people were tired of being under Britain’s rule and they were tired of following all of the unjust laws that were
“An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind” -Mahatma Gandhi. Machiavelli’s Prince shows that a leader should be aggressive and feared, but Mahatma Gandhi believed it was better to be peaceful and loved. Non-religious, unforgiving and impassive are just a few words that describe the Prince. He also sees no reason to keep his word and values image over substance. Even though Gandhi and Machiavelli’s Prince are both wise leaders, they are extremely different because of their religious beliefs, violent/non-violent tendencies, and value of the truth.
Gandhi worked as a global non-violence leader for many years of his life. He used methods of non-violence to attempt to gain independence for India. India had always been a colony of Great Britain, but as its economy and population continued to boom, the movement for independence did as well. Gandhi became a leader for this movement. He helped ease tensions that could have erupted into severe violence, violence that
Crash Course World History is an educational channel on You Tube aimed to educate motivated high school students who want learn concepts in world history. This segment describes the role of Ghandi and his perception of civil disobidence. The source argues that Ghandi essentially transferred moral value to political ideology helped accomplish Indian independence. The mass media coverage of Ghandi’s civil disobidence attracted global attention and cultural echanges. While civil disobedience may not always solve problems in the world completely, the ideology of civil disobedience allows people around the world to suggest their personal opinions on justice. Overall Ghandi’s civil disobidiene movement is a response to British inequality and mass
Peaceful, non violent, and brave can describe Mahatma Gandhi. Many people know Gandhi as a protester against the English, but he was so much more. As a well known non violent protester, Mahatma Gandhi inspired African Americans that they should fight for equal rights. Gandhi helped the world by showing people that they can change the way that they are treated without violence like they used to. He left behind a lasting legacy of helping people fight for their freedom and equality.
He was against any violence and wanted to lead his country in peace. This was something the indian people liked and the british underestimated gandhi. This approach didn't work in the start as when gandhi was in africa. He did not stop the tactic still if this approach didn't work at first. At this time he was eager to make indian independent. He studied in england to become a barrister. When moving to Africa he was thrown of a train in first class going to Pietermaritzburg. He noticed the prejudice and racism. This would be a huge part of his life later. He was to create a campaign to treat the people of Africa properly and his people. He was not to seek violence in this act and did it as “peaceful” and formal as possible. Because of this act he got a lot of recognition in England itself but nearly none in his home country of india. Upon returning to india Gandhi had made a name for himself,the people where to call him mahatma (meaning great soul). His goal at this time was to make india “independent”, or free from Britain. To do this he started the salt satyagraha (also know as the salt march). This march was to resolve the “heat” between the swaraj party and the Indian national congress. He and and many other boycotted the Indian political parties . As the campaign had many positive outcomes it also had an negative effect including the imprisonment of over 60,000 indian
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi more popularly known as Mahatma Gandhi,Mahatma meaning Good soul.He was born in Porbandar,Gujarat, India on October 2, 1869.He was born into a wealthy caste with his father being the minister of Porbandar.His mother was a devoted practitioner of Vaishnavism (worship of the Hindu god Vishnu), influenced by Jainism, an ascetic religion governed by tenets of self-discipline and nonviolence. When Gandhi was 18 he went to London to study law at one of the four law schools in the city,
In order to identify whether the Gandhi’s arguments were effective enough against British rule, firstly, paper will point out what were key factors that led Gandhi to stand up against British government. Later will mention the Gandhi’s famous book Hind Swaraj where he clearly addresses all his concerns and arguments about disobedience and non-violence in a proper way and finally will look at to what extend Gandhi was effective leader that could influence not only his own nation but also people from all around the world.