The Dawes Act was latter introduced The Dawes Act was passed the 8th of February 1887. It divided up reservation and gave allotted parcels of land to individual in severalty to Indians. The reservation on various granted individuals parcels of land rather than members of tribes. The Civil war brought a great impact to the American people, despite the six hundred thousand lives that was lost. Emancipation Proclamation which granted freedom to the salves, but it was not until a hundred years later that they were actual set free.
Supreme Court that argued against Plessy in the “Plessy V. Ferguson” case explained that their interpretation of the 14th amendment was that all citizens should be legally equal, but not necessarily socially equal. The court said that, “The object of the amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature of things, it could not have been intended… to enforce social equality.” In the “Plessy V. Ferguson” case, the court decided to segregate the train cars because it would make them separate but equal and have legal equality, but it doesn't have to have social equality. The 13th amendment explains that all slaves are free, and the court's decision on the railroad law makes it seem as if the court is trying to put more of a badge of servitude on the blacks by separating them from the blacks. The 13 amendment abolished slavery and said that all slaves are free and are made citizens. In this case, they all deserve equal
This includes slaves, which is why it was so important in 1868 after the Civil War. But today, it also defines citizenship in immigrants and gives them the right to live and work in the US. If we didn’t have this amendment, we would not be able to experience the cultures of other countries, and we would not be known as “the melting pot” of culture we are today. With the power of the Fourteenth Amendment, we can define what makes a citizen, prevent anyone who took an oath against or conspired against the United States from holding any position of office in out government, allow states to make and change laws if necessary, and ensure that citizen cannot have the right to “life, liberty, and property” taken away from them without due
This new definition opened the door to gays and lesbians claiming a right to be married, too. (Anonymous) In 2001, Netherlands became the first country to legalize gay marriage. They were soon followed South Africa, Spain, Canada and a great number of other countries and as of 2015, even the United States of American. ( Freedomtomarry.org) But due to its unique service to society, marriage can never be a private lifestyle choice, but must remain between a man and a woman. However, some may argue that same sex marriage is nothing new and dates back over some six hundred years.
Marriage equality can be achieved in the Philippines when the constitution is amended. Because according to the law, marriage is a union between a man and a woman thus limiting the marriage to opposite sex partners. There have been high interests in same-sex marriage in the Philippines since 2011 according to Google. The Philippine government should recognize the rights of every individual to choose the one they would marry. Marriage is for two people who love each other, and there should be no discrimination among
With the famous Supreme Court Case Obergefell v. Hodges that befell American society in 2015, many people believe that the same-sex marriage controversy is over; however, this is far from reality. Many people still believe that same-sex couples should be denied the right to marry. However, these people are on the wrong side of history: same-sex marriage should be endorsed by all, and its time as a controversial topic should be put to a stop. First of all, governments and businesses must comply with legal obligations that protect homosexual couples. The government, first of all, must follow the Constitution.
This is consistent with the principle of freedom and equality. Withholding civil marriage from homosexual couples violates a fundamental right: the right to marry the partner of one’s choice. According to the Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights, men and women have the rights to marry and found a family in their marriageable age. Legalising homosexual marriage in Hong Kong could allow the same-sex couples enjoy the same rights with the opposite-sex couples. Apart from providing fundamental right, legalisation could reduce the social discrimination.
Fortunately for a lot of gay men and lesbian women the view of parenthood, marriage and all other kinship relationships are viewed as social relationships and not biological ones any longer. This would have been due to the fact that in modern day society people place a great deal of emphasis on sociocultural characteristics rather than biological bonds. An argument begins to form when asked if these gay couples are within their legal boundaries when they challenge the Defense of Marriage Act as they can argue that they are being denied the 14th amendment which addresses the rights of citizens living and born on United States soil. All Americans are equal before the law and deserve equal rights. It could also be argued that marriage is the joining of two people based on love and trust that commit themselves to a long term relationship.
We cannot force the people of the community to like the issue on Same-Sex Marriage. One thing we wish to happen is for them to embrace the issue and to have respect and acceptance for our LGBT Community. If Same-Sex Marriage is legalized in the Philippines it will start a new era for the LGBT Community. An era where there is acceptance, gender equality and a peaceful society. THE VIEWS ABOUT SAME SEX MARRIAGE FROM VARIOUS CULTURES AND BELIEFS AROUND THE WORLD In many countries all around the world they have different views and practices regarding same-sex marriage depending from their cultures and beliefs.
The Act 2013 has afforded same sex couples the ability to marry in civil ceremonies, they may be turned away by religious organizations, since religious organizations may marry same sex couples only if they have ‘explicitly opted in.’ It is not unlawful for a religious organization or minister to refuse to marry a same sex couple as per the Equality Act of 2010, which is in accordance with Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights which guarantees the right to freedom of religion. The Act 2013 enables civil partnerships to convert into marriages, per the partners’ wishes. It provides transgender persons with the opportunity to have their change of gender recognized without having to bring their existing marriage to an end. The Act 2013 has ensured that there are marriage rights for everyone in the United Kingdom and has received a large welcome from