The Harrison Narcotic Act was proposed to Congress by Dr. Hamilton Wright. This particular Act was not made to criminalize the use of any drug. However, it was considered a tax law because there was a tax imposed on individuals that made or sold narcotics. Suppliers had the responsibility of registering with the Bureau of International Revenue once a year along with paying a one-dollar fee. Since medical professionals prescribed narcotics, they also had to register and pay the fee annually or they would be punished. Medical professionals could only prescribe these drugs for medical reasons and they had to possess records of distribution to patients for two years. However, it was not considered appropriate to prescribe a narcotic drug to treat an addiction, which was troubling for both medical professionals and addicts. The Harrison Act contributed to a large number of medical professionals being either indicted on narcotic charges or being forced to face prison sentences. This particular Act also transformed the way in which narcotics could be …show more content…
Hamilton Wright included racism within his proposal. Specifically, he proposed that African American Southerners snorted cocaine, and this caused African American men to rape white women. This caused fear to increase in the individuals of Congress causing them to believe that the passing of the Harrison Act was essential. This shows how relevant racism was during this time period. Another aspect that is historically significant is the fact that this law did not criminalize the use of narcotics, but only taxed the drugs. Throughout this time period the government believed that Congress was not legally capable of monitoring possession and use because of the Constitution. However, they did believe that they had to power to impose taxes to decrease drug use instead of imposing federal criminal
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
What we interpret from the text is that the law has little to do with the dangers associated with illicit (opium) drug usage? Additionally, people use other drugs, alcohol and tobacco (that are a hazard to health too), both privately and publicly are legal. In fact, creating 1908 anti-drug law is a fight between cultures- Chinese and white traders, it is all about economic crises, racism, resolving labor conflicts, satisfying federal government and, pleasing white traders. Most important of all, health issues does not play the significant role in the creation of the 1908 anti-drug law as it does in the present time. The nature of the statute law starts with the ferocity that took place on September 7, 1907.
Let’s look at the punishment related to crack cocaine use offenses and how they are that much more severe than the punishment for illicit use of prescription opioids. Through this research we will come to realize that the only real difference between the two is the skin color of the people using them. With a rapid increase of deaths related to the misuse of pain relief prescription medications there is a frenzy in the “white community”. However, this same type of sympathy was unheard of during the black crack cocaine epidemic of the 1990s. Where the most aggressive drug sentencing laws to date were instituted, impacting minorities
Pure Food and Drug Act: Robert Clark In 1879 Robert Clark started working in a factory. He started as a 17 year old boy who made products in the factory but as his years there added up I became higher in rank. First, Robert was just one of the many guys making about 1.50 per day.
1900’s and it was directed by black men. The Chinese immigrants directed the anti-opium laws in the 1870’s, while Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans directed the anti-marijuana laws in the 1910’s and 20’s. Drugs started getting evaluated for medical safety and efficacy in the 1960’s, due to the fact that drugs were becoming the symbols of youthful rebellion and even political dissent (Muriskin & Roberts, 2009 P.110). The war in drugs got declared by President Nixon, in June 1971.
This act required manufacturers and distributors of cocaine, opium to register with the US Department of Treasury. This placed a special tax on these drugs and keep records of each transaction. The act authorized the prescribing of opiates and cocaine but the law was open to interpretation of the enforcement body. The Internal Revenue Bureau closed down state and city narcotic clinics and arrested drug violators to federal penitentiaries (Wallechinsky, 2015).
There are two things that prompted the idea of regulating drugs in the 20th century. They were the abuse of the drug and the drug use among minority groups. Cocaine and opium were the main drugs used for treating pain the soldiers were in and women with female problems. These two drugs were the first to be patent because of the addiction that is was causing. Today patent means it has to be registered with the government.
Legal measures against drug abuse in the United States were first established in 1875, when opium dens were outlawed in San Francisco. The first national drug law was the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which required accurate labeling of patent medicines containing opium and certain other drugs. In 1914 the Harrison Narcotic Act forbade sale of substantial doses of opiates or cocaine except by licensed doctors and pharmacies. Later, heroin was totally banned. Subsequent Supreme Court decisions made it illegal for doctors to prescribe any narcotic to addicts; many doctors who prescribed maintenance doses as part of an addiction treatment plan were jailed, and soon all attempts at treatment were abandoned.
So they were advocating for the proper use of drugs. They didn't think regulations as powerful as Anslinger’s were needed. They were scholars who knew he wasn’t providing the entire information to the public about the dangers of drugs. Anslinger even said that marijuana was dangerous because it made a teenager kill his entire family; hindering that fact that he had psychiatric health issues as well as having used marijuana. Therefore there was legislation like the Harrison Act, that protected the doctors that wanted to disregard Anslinger’s ideas and use drugs for their addicted patients.
It was originally concerned with ensuring products were labeled correctly, however, later on efforts were made to outlaw any products what were not safe as well as not effective. The act required that drugs such as alcohol, cocaine, heroin, morphine and cannabis were to be accurately labeled with substances and dosage. The Pure Food and Drug Act was responsible for testing all foods and drugs intended for human consumption, made it a requirement for prescriptions to be signed from a licensed physician before a patient could purchase certain drugs, and made it a requirement of label warnings on habit forming
In 1971 President Richard Nixon declared War on Drugs in an effort to combat the increasing use of illegal drugs in the United States. In 1986, in response to the surge of crack cocaine that was flooding American inner cities, Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which handed out harsher penalties for crack cocaine offenses than for powder cocaine offenses. For sentencing purposes, they used the 100:1 rule, the law said that one gram of crack cocaine be treated as equivalent to 100 grams of powder cocaine. Because crack cocaine offenders tended to be black and powder cocaine offenders tended to be white, the law seemed just to target African Americans.
The production of drug abroad was also reduced. The major purpose of the law to protect the people from drugs was to create a drug free America and to establish the office of National Drug control policy. 2) Animal drug user fee act 2003 The Animal Drug user fee act was established in 2003 by the congress
The loopholes in Prohibition legislation allowed physicians and pharmacies to distribute alcohol on a prescription basis. The practice of prescription liquor allowed violators a legal avenue to obtain otherwise illegal alcohol. The only restriction doctors faced was obtaining “licenses to dispense liquor” (191). Ultimately, the prescription allowed doctors to gain an extended profit on alcohol purchases and provided minimal effort to achieve it. As a result, many historians call prohibition an “experiment” rather than a reform.
The Purpose of Stopping Illegal Prescriptions in America Abusing prescription pain relievers has become a worldwide problem and it needs to be stopped. In the United States alone, an estimated amount of 2.1 million people are victims to disorders and addictions caused by prescription pain pills. This problem is rising at an exponential rate and the number of deaths due to prescription pain relievers overdose is 4 times higher than it was in 1999. People are using these medications as a cheaper way to get high. However, these alternative drugs may cost less but the consequences of abusing these pills are too high to take the risk.
As pointed out by David Courtwright, the spread of psychoactive substances, including tea, coffee, coca, spirits, opium, and tobacco, was a worldwide phenomenon which began in the 15th century. Virgiania Berridge and Griffith Edwards pointed out that before the first Pharmacy Act in 1868, opium was freely traded in Britain, just like any other commodity. It was transported into Britain via commercial channels, and widely enjoyed by a large section of society ranging from the