The Cold War was a period of tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. In The Quiet American by Graham Greene, Fowler perspective is more justified because he understands that U.S.actions were hypocritical and knows Vietnam cared for their people and independence and what I mean by this is they didn't want the spread of Communism Fowler is more justified because he understands U.S. actions were hypocritical. Also, Thomas Fowler, he's a journalist so he knows a lot about what happens throughout the whole world and covers stories about the U.S. and other countries. While on the other hand Alden Pyle who works with (CIA Undercover) really doesn't know much about anything and he thinks the U.S. would be a good ally and he just spreads around everything he believes. Pyle is a good person …show more content…
They were so pretty. Why she might have been one of them I wanted to protect her” (Greene 49). So I guess this characterizes Pyle as caring and shows that he is very respectful towards women. Also, Phuong who he's trying to protect represents the U.S. and trying to stop the conflict between the two countries. Therefore Pyle is really generous and caring but also has lots of flaws and ruins a lot of things and causes many problems. Fowler, while they are in the Watchtower, tells Pyle something about the Vietnamese he says “ I like the buffaloes they don't like our smell, the smell of Europeans” (Greene 87). What he's trying to tell Pyle is the Buffaloes (Vietnamese People) don't like us on their land and don't like the smell of us (foreigners) which symbolizes who they are the Buffaloes and we are the Europeans. Because Vietnam doesn't want any foreigners on their land trying to take over and they don't like people other than Vietnamese. But Pyle really doesn't care too much about what Fowler says cause it's the
R. McMaster is an American soldier and a career officer in the U.S army. The purpose of McMaster’s book is to analyze how and why the United States becomes involved in the Vietnam War. During this, the author also explains on what he thinks why the president decided to keep the war going instead and escalate it. McMaster came to a conclusion that Johnson made the mess himself and he chose to escalate the war. The author presents the war as a consequence of specific decisions made by specific men, Lyndon B. Johnson.
In A Better War Lewis Sorely presents his audience with a well thought out, and well written examination of the last years of the Vietnam War. In 1968 then commander William Westmorland was superceded by General Creighton Adams(16-17). Several vitally important events during the war had taken place under the direction and leadership of Adams but by the time he had taken over, the people and media of the United States were declining in their concern towards the war in Vietnam. Because of this limited amount of attention towards the end of the war, most of the media coverage having to do with it focused on the time before Tet, when the tensions were high revolving the topic of Vietnam. Sorely points this fact out, using material that was only available in recent times, he delivers to us a swift and corrective story in which the little known truths are brought to light.
The start of the book in the late 1970 the United States had pretty much won the Vietnam War. We had defeated the Viet Cong in the field, returned most of the control to the South Vietnamese and where the South Vietnamese could continue the war on their own. This is when Army General Creighton Abrams replaced William Westmoreland in 1968, after the military defeat but public relations disaster of the Tet Offensive. Where Westmoreland had treated the War as a military exercise, Abrams understood its political side. Abrams worked on developing a new war plan at the Pentagon.
In a “Vietnam Veterans against the war”, John Kerry’s comment on President Nixon not wanting to become, “the first President to lose a war,” illustrates just how insistent Nixon was on maintaining a superior Presidential image of power. Ironically, Nixon has one of the more, if not the most, tarnished Presidential image due to the Watergate scandal. Kerry’s speech drove the idea that the Veterans fighting in Vietnam did not believe that they were there to do good and did not feel that they were the “heroes” liberalizing the Vietnamese from the dangers of communism. As he notes, most people there did not understand the difference between communism and democracy. The freedom the Vietnamese sought was liberation from the helicopters, the bombs,
In If I Die in a Combat Zone, author Tim O’Brien argues that the Vietnam War was unjust by expressing his disapproval of the war through his own moral beliefs, sharing the descriptions of deaths in Vietnam of the innocent citizens, and by describing how much the war impacted himself and others negatively. In the beginning of the book, O’Brien openly stated his beliefs on the war. He believed it was wrongly accepted and unjust, but he battled his own opinions with society’s views anyway (18). Constantly, O’Brien discussed within his own head about the true definition of bravery and courage (147).
The Vietnam war, one of the longest war in the history of United States, is often regarded as the most controversial battle. The liberal, radical and conservative interpretation tries to shed some light on the dark and murky image of the war. Radical view suggests
I do not believe you can have a positive view on American history during the Cold War with the Soviets. President Reagan attempted to set America apart from the Soviets by using faith and freedom as the framework of our nation. Acceptance and understanding is a far greater tool as demonstrated by President Obama. The Soviets were not an evil empire and people living in the USSR could just as well have had faith and traditions just as those in the U.S. President Reagan should not have called Soviets an evil empire and inferred that the U.S. was in a good vs. evil battle with the Soviets and played into the hearts of individuals in the nation. This was simply not true.
The Vietnam War was a long battle of seventeen long years. There were many causes leading up to this traumatic event. The U.S. got involved because of the spread of communism throughout Asia. The novel, The Things They Carried is about how morality can change both how a soldier thinks and feels. In Tim O’Brien’s historical fiction novel, The Things They Carried, both the physical and geographical surroundings shape the psychological traits of the characters during the following events: Mary Anne’s disappearance, the death of Curt Lemon and Mitchell Sander’s unbelievable story.
We believe that true, patriotic heroes go to war without cowardice or complaint. Yet, as O’Brien demonstrates in his novel, war is incomprehensible and lacks the morality we expect it to have. The Vietnam War was fought for reasons unknown to the soldiers involved as seen in the lines “The very facts were shrouded in uncertainty: Was it a civil war? A war of national liberation or simple aggression?
Some people thought that we shouldn 't be in the war because it wasn 't our war to fight, and others thought we should get involved to stop the spread of communism. In a Nation Divided, many men would avoid getting drafted by lying about their health condition, marrying, and moving to Canada. People often questioned whether we should have a draft or not because of the fact that not everyone had the desire to fight for our country. In the article What Happened in My Lai, the massacre changed the perspective the US citizens had on us being in Vietnam. Investigations concerning what happened in My Lai were misleading and superficial, and the info was suppressed.
In If I Die In A Combat Zone, author Tim O’Brien argued that the Vietnam War was immoral through the evil it placed on others lives, how poorly justified it was, and how the war desensitized the soldiers to death. Although Tim O’Brien came from a background of parents who fought in the Navy and were active in war, he was a protestor of the Vietnam war along with any war that had no good cause behind it. He was being drafted into a war that he didn’t want to take any part in. To O’Brien, the war was plain evil in every shape or form.
Reagan pursued a heavily anti-Soviet ideology designed at out-doing the Soviet Union is various areas such as military might (“Tom Clancy” 308). This is similar to how the U.S. approaches the Soviets in the novel, and the reader is able to sense the general disgust towards the Soviet Union as a whole. Further, Hixon, a literary critic, explains that Clancy helps to “reinforce American exceptionalism by demonizing both foreign enemies and domestic political foes, much as the Reagan administration did also” (Hixon 105). Understanding Reagan’s philosophy, Clancy creates a fictitious administration run by the same logic. By making innumerable comparisons to Reagan’s presidency, Clancy indirectly secures the United State’s
“American Reckoning: The Vietnam War and our National Identity” is a book that takes us through 20 years of the War in Vietnam from about 1955 to 1975. The Vietnam War is the second longest war in US history encompassing 5 presidents which include Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford. Appy’s book gives a unique American perspective on incredible, horrifying, and inspiring stories in Vietnam as well as American. Through Apps book readers learn about different communism containment methods that America used. Readers also learn about different methods of attack on Vietnam from an American standpoint and how the different failures of the US army and US politicians turned many heads into hard truths about the war.
The soldiers in the Vietnams war were there for different reasons, some soldiers were forced against their will and some were there by choice. Because of that, each soldier has their own thoughts about the war, O’Brien has interpreted that “The twenty –six men were very quiet: some of them excited by the adventure, some of them afraid”. This clearly shows how the men
In addition, he deals with resentment towards America and its handling of these events, specifically how America blames others rather than itself. Overall, In the Lake of the Woods by Tim O’Brien allows him to express his anger and disagreements with the Vietnam conflict, and the psychological