Lacie Grant
World Literature 1
Mrs. Gray
1 February 2023
Keep Memory Alive and The American Idea
“Age shall not wear them, nor the years condemn. When we go down and in the morning, We will remember them.” A quote by Laurence Binyan. In the essays, “Keep Memory Alive” and “The American Idea,” the author uses Rhetorical devices and appeals to be able to explain their reasoning more thoroughly.Some Rhetorical devices are Logos, Pathos and Ethos. The author, Theodore H. White, for the essay “The American Idea”, was born May 6, 1915, in Dorchester, Boston. Elie Wiesel, the author for "Keep Memory Alive”, was born in 1928 in the town of Sighet, which is now part of Romania. These essays are about both the Holocaust and the Declaration of Independence. “Keep Memory Alive,” is based on the Holocaust and a lot more during this time. This essay uses Rhetorical devices and appeals. In Wiesel's essay, it states, “ We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” Meaning people who are silent during this time did not choose to take a side and speak up. “Keep Memory Alive” was on the behalf of the survivors and the children. It had also stated about the
…show more content…
Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Theodore H. White all wrote the Declaration of Independence. This essay also uses rhetorical devices and appeals, such as Pathos, Logos, and Ethos. An excerpt from the Declaration of Independence was stated in the essay, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” This sentence is Rhetorical, and it is Ethos because it is referring to someone
In the “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech,” Elie implied that his memory and many other victims’ memories of the Holocaust should never be forgotten because he believes the victims should be remembered and honored. He believes that others should continue to stand up against antisemitism and keep these memories forever, that way, nothing like the Holocaust ever occurs again. This central idea is shared amongst many other sources, including the book “Night” by Elie Wiesel, The social media article about Lily Ebert titled “It Happened,” and Elie Wiesel’s Acceptance speech. Elie Wiesel created a book called “Night.” Night was a memoir by Elie Wiesel.
Whereas others choose to suppress their memories, this is their way of finding peace and moving on with their life. The difference in individuals ways of coping with the trauma of the holocaust is justified in the opposition of opinions that Harry Weinberg and Elie Wiesel possess. Ellie Wiesel believes that the sharing of stories and memories from the Holocaust is crucial as it was "the last wish of the dead", therefore he holds himself as responsible to "devote [his] life to testify on behalf" of the people who did not make it out of World War II or the concentration camps alive. Wiesel writes "to remain faithful" to everyone who suffered the most appalling genocide in history; and to develop an understanding amongst all people of the ghastly events that took place under the Nazi's reign. Harry Weinberg portrays survivors that choose to let their stories and memories be forgotten and swept along as they find peace in their new life away from the horrific events that plague their memory.
In ” Keep Memory Alive” and “The American Idea” both use rhetorical appeals to create the speech. Both speeches were great and both had a great impact on the world. They should be remembered and acknowledged more. In Elie Wiesel’s “Keep Memory Alive” speech he is trying to encourage the audience that they should forever remember what happened to the people in the Holocaust. He was not happy about the fact that the world was silent and that they knew and did nothing about it.
Wiesel writes, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.” Wiesel is saying in this quote that not taking a side in a cruelty will not help the victim because it won’t stop the oppressor from doing what they are doing to the victim. Wiesel also writes, “Do I have the right to represent the multitudes who have perished? Do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf?
This is displayed in two books. In these two books, there are two characters who are survivors of two major genocides known as, The Holocaust and The Parsley Massacre. These characters are perfect examples of how identity and memory are hand and hand with each other. In 2006 Elie Wiesel
Elie Wiesel was Jewish author and humanist that was born in 1928 in Romania. During World War 2, Wiesel was witness and experienced the atrocities committed during the Holocaust where his family was deported to Auschwitz. Wiesel’s parents and little sister ended up dying from the conditions present in the camp. After the war, he went on to be an author and a human rights activist. Wiesel advocated for remembering about and learning from the Holocaust and became the leading spokesman on the Holocaust.
Elie Wiesel is a Holocaust survivor who strongly believes that people need to share their stories about the Holocaust with others. Elie Wiesel was in concentration camps for about half of his teen years along with his father. After being the only member of his family to survive the Holocaust he resolved to make what really happened more well-known. Elie Wiesel wrote dozens of books and submitted an essay titled “A God Who Remembers” to the book This I Believe. The essay focused on Elie Wiesel’s belief that those who have survived the Holocaust should not suppress their experiences but must share them so history will not repeat itself.
Elie Wiesel voiced his emotions and thoughts of the horrors done to Jewish people during World War II whilst developing his claim. Wiesel “remember[s] his bewilderment,” “his astonishment,” and “his anguish” when he saw they were dropped into the ghetto to become slaves and to be slaughtered. He repeats the words “I remember” because he and the world, especially those who suffered in the ghettos and camps, would never be able to forget how innocent suffered. Consequently, he emphasized that “no one” has the right to advocate for the dead. Like many other people in the world, he lost his family during the war.
When Wiesel makes it clear that he has suffered personal loss, he is evoking an emotional response from his audience. By stating that he senses their presence “The presence of my parents, that of my little sister.” the audience empathizes with him and the horror of the Holocaust is made more clear for them. They cannot only understand his feelings; they can connect to them which strengthens their understanding of the need to act whenever they witness inhumanity.
At the time of Hitler's reign six million Jews died and even more suffered, yet the world remained silent. Six million lives could have been saved by simply speaking out against these tormentors. Eli feels strong about this subject and says, "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor never the tormented"(Wiesel Acceptance Speech, pg 1). This helps the reader realize if society doesn't speak it takes the side of the tormentor.
Wiesel wanted to make us feel sad and trust him by using pathos in the speech. At the beginning of the speech, he states, “Do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf? I do not. No one may speak for the dead, no one may interpret their mutilated dreams and visions.” In this part of his talk, he tells the people that no one can ever make up for the loss of so many people in the concentration camps.
Thomas Jefferson in particular wrote the Declaration of Independence, which stated “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
This excerpt is relevant to Wiesel’s biggest fear which is that the world has not learned or has simply forgotten about the Holocaust. The line “Never shall I forget…” (Wiesel, 34) is reiterated to show how important remembering is to Wiesel. This also pertains to Wiesel 's “big idea” which is that his purpose for writing Night was to never let anyone forget about the Holocaust. He hopes that this memoir helps prevent another genocide like this, and helps motivate people to stand up to injustices.
Finally, the author expresses the dangers in ignorance and forgetfulness, “Because if we forget who the guilty are, we are accomplices” (Wiesel). He also conveys how if we forget the guilty, we do not care about what crimes they put forth. We cannot be ignorant to the oppressors, for the effect is the same as to side with them. In conclusion, Elie Wiesel persuades the audience and expresses his bias on neutrality during World War II by using his authority and personal
He uses memory as a method of protecting the future from the past. Wiesel explains that memory is “mystical” and that memory “will save humanity” (Wiesel 3) because the “memory of evil will serve as a shield against evil” and the “memory of death will serve as a shield against death” He says this because to prevent another event similar to the Holocaust; we must remember the evil to protect us from evil and remember those that died so that way we may protect ourselves from death. The logos he uses by telling us the uses of memory allows the reader to understand how to protect the future and how to prevent another Holocaust by remembering. Logically, there is a connection between memory and protection that was used allowed the reader to understand the importance of