Not only does this principle aid in supporting the individual mentally, but as a society it encourages new ideas that lead to innovation. Finally, Freedom of Speech prevents the state from gaining to much power. Without citizens having the right to certain moral beliefs the government could potentially censor its population in order to gain complete power within the
once you exiamin federlism and anti-federlism it becomes clear only one would lead to a successful country and that is federlism. Federlism is best for the country becuse it secures the rights of the people,provides a stable government and produces a fair system to create laws. The first and foremost issue of government is to secure the rights of the people and federalism does this better than the opposition in a number of ways. By limiting the power of factions, providing
For the government to be truly accountable to its citizens, those citizens must vote; they must express approval for policies and policy makes they like, and disapproval for those they do not (Coleman et.al). Lijphart and Ranney have positioned their stand with regard to voting and nonvoting. For Lijpart, compulsory voting is a prerequisite in order to have a strong democracy while Ranney’s view of nonvoting is that it is not a social disease. Comparison with these ideas is vital because there’s a need to fully appreciate the relevance of voting in a democratic state. High voter turnout could mean that people are satisfied as to how the government provides for their needs and promotes their general welfare.
This of course is predicated on the belief that the public’s opinion will influence the actions of their representatives in Congress since representatives want to be reelected. In modern use, particularly with television and looser campaign finance regulations, Presidents now are more sending a message to party leadership or interest groups, letting them either take up the issue in Congress or mobilize the people. Of the powers a President has, the power of influence; especially in modern, media-driven society, is paramount. Although another aspect of Presidential power is the idea of executive privilege, or being able to keep all conversations the President has private. This is perhaps one of the more controversial powers given to the President because it begs the question of how a President can be held responsible if the people don’t know what they are doing?
The system may seem confusing or unnecessary, but its importance is revealed by the care taken by the Founding Fathers in designing the Electoral College, which was described in more detail and at greater length than any other issue addressed in the Constitution (Guelzo and Hulme). Despite this, many still call for a shift to a popular vote system for the presidential election; however, such a change would be a mistake. The Electoral College should not be abolished and replaced by a popular vote because it is necessary to uphold the structure of the United States government, to protect the interests of the whole nation, and to preserve the integrity of the presidential election. Opponents of the Electoral College frequently argue that the Electoral College is outdated to the point of becoming obsolete, that it contradicts America’s identity as a democracy, and that it gives too much power to states with a small population. Critics of the Electoral College condemn it as a relic of a bygone era.
The importance of voting should be emphasized due to how it can change the direction of a country. As stated by the 32nd president of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt: “Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.”. For instance, one should not cast their vote blindly and should instead educate themselves on the current candidates. It’s important to realize that when you vote, you do not only vote for yourself,you are also voting for the future generations.
Dear Mr. President, Civic and political participation of the people in this nation is important in order to keep a functioning government and society. If the people of this nation ignores their civic responsibilities and don’t help make important decisions, then just a couple individuals are choosing who merits government positions. It 's our obligation as citizens to ensure our rights and take an interest politically. Lastly, civic and political participation is important because it allows people to be herd, to fight for justice and equality. What issues or events motivated the person to action?
Cruelty well employed basically asserts that a king should appear as a cruel figure in order to command respect and obedience from his people. However, he cannot appear to be too harsh before his citizens because he may lose their support. 4. In a sense there is a democratic lesson to Machiavelli’s discussion of civil princedom.
A candidate must reach a majority of 270 to win the election. There are many arguments for why the Electoral College is still effective - it strengthens the unity of the country by preventing the domination of an area with a higher population over rural areas. It maintains stability of our political environment by encouraging our bipartisan system, as it makes it very difficult for new parties to win enough popular votes to gain any traction in an election. Most importantly, it maintains a balance between state and federal governments, where the states have the power to select their own
If the citizens of the United States wish to sustain a government and protect their civil rights, then the civilians must contribute into upholding them. The responsibilities as American citizens is very important because if the people decide to ignore their obligations then it could change their government drastically. The people could change the way the U.S government is arranged and/or become a system that lacks the representative of the people, an anarchy. In order for this to not occur, the citizens of the country must fulfill this by maintaining and take care of their rights and responsibilities or duties.
Not long after the United States constitution was created, the country witnessed a growing debate over how to explain and apply the presentation of the new constitution. During the 1790s the United States federal government took charge in a series of threats to the country such as international tensions. Most importantly the formation of competing political parties which were the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. Today the United States is predominately a two party system although more political parties exist, American voters usually side with one of the main two which are the Democrats or the Republicans. These two parties represent different visions for America.
As has been thoroughly established, the problem in America doesn’t appear to be related to the recent increase in partisanship. If the partisan argument were sufficient, it would suggest gridlock would occur in countries that also possess this same principle. What has been proven though is that this is not the case in other parts of the world, and instead quite the contrary often occurs. A new answer must be formulated to answer the question as to what is causing the consistency in America’s dissent and inefficiency. What appears to be the case is that rather than the actual, tangible partisanship being the problem, it is instead a lower tolerance for partisanship that America possesses.
Political parties have been alive almost as long as the country, and for good reason. They make democracy possible through moderating the mass public and the government. I contend that they help solve the problems of ambition and elective office seeking, making group decisions, mobilizing supporters and solving collective dilemmas among candidates, voters, funders, and publicists. In addition, parties should focus on getting their candidates re-elected instead of concentrating on issues and ideology. Furthermore, when parties have entrenched positions the public is adversely affected as the policies may be unpopular.
The Federalist Party is one of the two original political parties in the United States of America. These two parties originated during the first administration of George Washington. They were formed as a result of different opinions towards the extent of authority the new government wielded. The discussions during the debate of the bank of United States clearly portrayed clear different opinions between the state and the nation’s authority. They also had different perspectives towards the proposed treaty with Great Britain (MacDonald, 1905).