“It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both…” Is the iconic text written by Niccolo Machiavelli in his “infamous” work of literature, The Prince. However, the book was popular posthumously. The Prince was created as a gift to appease Lorenzo Medici. Because Machiavelli had conspired against the powerful Florentine Lorenzo Medici. In consequence, Medici forced exile upon Machiavelli. The prince was successfully delivered to Medici. Ironically, Medici had not taken a glance over Machiavelli’s masterpiece; until it discovered by someone years later. The prince is no ordinary book that consists: exposition, climax, and the resolution. The gift to Lorenzo Medici resembles more like a brochure, how to guide, or even an advice on …show more content…
Hey, that sound familiar, more like the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917! When Vladimir Lenin and his Communist Party overthrew the Czar and his family and became Russia’s(USSR) first communist dictator. Machiavelli’s idea about becoming an effective king reflects upon the citizens admiration or devotion to their ruler. Personally, I believe any citizen would be loyal to a charismatic or a prideful monarch. Like, Queen Elizabeth II she may be a figurehead but, her glamourous styles and communication to her people certifies her to beloved by the English citizens. Machiavelli’s comment on controlling acquired territory victoriously; is to create a colony. Transporting citizens to newly acquired territory is much simpler to rule than to rule unknown people in the newly acquired territory. Like, the European conquest and discovery of Americas. There, many European powerhouses sent their citizens to their soon to be colony so they can practice the theology of mercantilism. Honestly, the prince would be useful gift for Lorenzo but, he didn’t care. Many notable dictators and monarchs must have referenced this book for their personal guidance for ruling for sure! It was rumored that during Adolph Hitler’s death he carried the prince in his coat, which I feel unease because he was close to rule the world! If it was not for the victory for Soviets in the Battle of Stalingrad; when thousands of German soldiers were starving and freezing to death in the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, a time when Italy as a whole had yet to be formed; the Italian subcontinent consisted only of loosely connected groups of independent city states with a constantly evolving political battleground. Thus Machiavelli wrote The Prince to convey his idea of a strong, active, and in his own eyes, perfect ruler to the current ruling family, the Medici, as he wished to impress them and become an eventual political attaché for the family. Machiavelli argues that when given a choice it is better to be feared than loved, and bases the majority of his rhetorical argument on logical cause and effect conclusions that are exemplified through his use of anecdotes, and analogy. The excerpt begins at chapter fifteen with Machiavelli stating that he writes the prince in order to “make something useful for whoever understands it” (Machiavelli ch.15), and he expounds upon this simple purpose by devising clear and logical solutions to many of the problems that a ruler may face.
The first half of his life was spent in the Golden Age of Florence, the heyday of the Renaissance, and the second half in a period of war between France and Spain and other powers competing in Italy. 《 The prince》was written during the period of Machiavelli's dismissal from office, and he makes it clear that his purpose in writing the book was to offer it to the Florentine authorities for reappointment. In this book, he strives to demonstrate the political wisdom he has acquired through his long political practice, limiting his subject matter to the analysis of the monarchy, which is central to his discussion of how monarchs can retain their states. Machiavelli’s political ideology was shaped by his belief in the importance of power and the need for a strong, centralized government.
Then as an attempt to regain a political post and my family’s good favour, Machiavelli wrote The Prince, which was inspired by the shrewd and cunning Cesare Borgia in 1532! Which helped to fuel his fame up to this day! The notorious book espoused his views that strong rulers should be harsh with their subjects and enemies, and that any action with no moral views is okay to do so if the leader thinks it is so. ‘The prince’ was manly for advice to me- Lorenzo De Medici .He wrote that fear and deception were the best ways to allow better political control and for any rulers to remain in power.
Both of these highly influential authors had different opinions on ruling that would shape how people would rule during their time and for rulers to come. One of Machiavelli’s major points in The Prince was that it was better to be feared than to be loved. He said this was because while both ways can be useful tools to help one rule, men are less likely to turn a ruler if they were afraid of punishment. Machiavelli had little faith in the common man and had this to say about them, “They are ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving, avoiders of dangers, eager to gain”(pg.353).
In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.
Machiavelli wrote about a fictitious prince, describing how he is a terrible being who has no respect for people who have a lower status than him. He is described as being selfish and untrustworthy. His writing about this prince was supposed to replicate princes and kings that were ruling and open he reader’s eyes to real issues occuring. In Document 1 there is an excerpt from The Prince, written by Machiavelli, telling about how terrible the Prince of England. Document 1 states, “For all men in general this observation may be made: they are ungrateful, fickle, and deceitful, eager to avoid dangers, and avid for gain, and while you are useful to them they are all with you, but when it [danger] approaches they turn on you”.
In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote “The Prince,” telling rulers how they should rule. (Document 1) Many of the ideas in his book are shown in the ways these rulers governed their people. King Louis XIV believed if there were multiple people had power more would take advantage of it (Document 3) which is a major idea from “The Prince,” stating “for love is held by a bond of obligation, which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it.” (Document 1).
The Prince and the Discourses, by Machiavelli as a gift to the prince. Because it was the best thing that Niccolo Machiavelli could give to him. He was trying to teach the prince ways to stay in power. Machiavelli even stated it himself “I can consider of this subject, discussing what a principality is, the variety of such states, how they are won, how they are held, and how they are lost” (Machiavelli xxiv). The main focus of his work was with monarchies because he did not care for republics.
In Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, he maintains a harsh perspective on reality. His advice on how to maintain power leaves no room for compassion or generousity. While some may believe that these are qualities of a good person, Machiavelli believes these qualities lead to the downfall of rulers. He acknowledges that, in reality, it is impossible for someone to have qualities of a good person and simultaneously a good ruler. Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion.
The Prince is a revolutionary political treatise by Machiavelli, sometimes considered to be one of the first works of modern political philosophy, that invoked extensive debate due to its controversial preferencing of reality’s truths above moral ideals. In this book, Machiavelli presents a series of claims about how a prince, a term in this setting generally used to mean any ruler or sovereign, should act in order to obtain glory, respect, and power. These claims have received widespread critical attention, namely because of his support for using, even needing to use, violent and often immoral actions in order to retain such power. He justifies this notion with the further claim that otherwise, without committing these immoral actions, a prince
His book, The Prince uses Renaissance values and applies them to politics, intriguing most everyone. His book targets powerful men, teaching them how to gain and maintain power. “It is not al all necessary for a prince to have all the good qualities which I have named, but it is necessary to seem to have them” (Machiavelli). Although Machiavelli gained his power, not every man can, so Machiavelli is saying that in order to become an idol, you just have to project the idea of power. People with power are admired, so Machiavelli wrote a book teaching how to gain power, and become and idol themselves.
Both men had similar outlooks on how goals should be achieved as well as similar morals. The ideal Prince would do anything necessary to achieve a goal and to maintain absolute power. The result is of utmost importance, not how one gets there. Hitler executing this idea many times. He came into power by wowing crowds with his speeches, intimidating other parties, appealing to the nationalism and pride of the German people, and lying.
In the book, Machiavelli believes in the idea of having a strong dominant leader, in order to preserve the benefits to the citizens as a group instead of individually. This strategy clearly shows in chapter seventeen where Machiavelli points out that every prince would prefer to be loved than to be feared. However, the two rarely co-existed. If one had to choose, it is not only better to be feared than to be loved but it is also much “safer” looking at it realistically. By safer, it means that you will not have to worry and watch out as much since people will be less likely to conspire against someone they fear than someone they love.
As modeled by Niccolò Machiavelli in The Prince, a great leader should hold an even amount of love and fear over his citizens. In today’s day and age, many principles from this work have been disproven but as we take a look at contemporary art, such as television, it is seen that many ideas have found their way in. In the story told by the show Game of Thrones many characters embody traits Machiavelli describes in The Prince, some more rather than others.
I. Machiavelli In his famous work the Prince Niccolo Machiavelli exposes what it takes to be a good prince and how only this good price and keep control over his state. There are many different qualities that make a man a good ruler but there are some that are more essential than others. In this work Machiavelli stresses the importance of being a warrior prince, a wise prince, and knowing how to navigate the duality of virtù and vices. Without these attributes there was no way that a prince could hold together their state and their people.