Some of the greatest novels in history tell tales of the most heroic individuals the human mind could conjure. Usually, the hero of the novel sets out on a quest to defeat an evil villain, sacrificing a great amount along the way. Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is an exception. The novel is centered around Victor Frankenstein, young scientist who sets out to create life, but in the process, he accidentally creates a “monster.” A large part of this novel is based on the theme of perception. Many people, over the years, have argued over who Shelley’s intended hero or villain is. Most argue that Frankenstein was the real monster for creating and then abandoning the creature which leads to the many crimes the creature commits; however, the …show more content…
Readers feel bad for him because they believe that his actions are justifiable after Victor abandons him, but instead of just going after Victor, the creature goes as far as to threaten the entire world to get what he wants. In an attempt to force Victor to listen to him speak, the monster declares, “Yet it is in your power to recompense me, and deliver them from and evil which it only remains for you to make so great that not only you and your family, but thousands of others, shall be swallowed up in whirlwinds of his rage” (Shelley 84). This vicious ultimatum frames the issue in a way that makes it seem like it is only Victor’s obligation to save his fellow humans, when really the monster has full control over how he responds to Victor’s unkindness. The monster is selfish; he cares more about his own happiness than the life of every other being on the planet. Not only does the monster kill a child, he decides to blame Justine for his crime. He proclaims, “[N]ot I, but she shall suffer: the murder I have committed because I am forever robbed of all that she could give me, she shall atone. The crime had its source in her: be hers the punishment!” (Shelley 122). Instead of taking responsibility for his actions the monster blames all he has done on his inability to receive love from someone like Justine and commits yet another villainous crime by framing Justine because of this delusional belief that all of his actions can be blamed on his lack of human connection. While harm may have been done to the creature in the past, he still has the choice to refrain from doing harm to others. Some may argue that he is technically age equivalent to a toddler, but his intelligence is far beyond that. Even with the knowledge of right and wrong, the creature chooses to do villainous things. His absence of morality is what makes him a
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
He in many ways was much like his creator, extremely intelligent and curious of the world around him, much like Victor when he was young. He taught himself to read because he wanted to understand the world and he learned to communicate to vocalize his loneliness to people and maybe gain acceptance. And will rejection after rejection, he becomes more and more apathetic toward others. When the Creature killed Victor’s younger brother he tries to deflect onto Victor that it is his fault William and Justine are dead because he abandoned the Creature and wishes to destroy him. “You accuse me of murder; yet you would, with a satisfied conscience, destroy your own creature.
Generally, when people think of a monster, the first thing that comes to mind is a hideous, gruesome, inhuman creature - not a seemingly innocent person. In Frankenstein, a gothic graphic novel written by Gris Grimly, the narrator - Victor Frankenstein - faces conflict that makes his innocence questionable. This graphic novel proves that a monster does not necessarily equate to a hideous, unwanted creature. Some people suspect that the creature is a monster due to its violent behavior and cruel actions. The truth, contrastingly, is that the true monster of this novel is Victor, not the creature, because he chose to create the creature yet neglected it and failed to apologize or acknowledge his wrongdoing.
The world and his creator’s rejection of the Creature sent him on a path to failure that proved to be lonely and painful as they used his grotesque appearance as justification for discrimination. According to Bernatchez “If we understand the Creature’s moral ugliness to have been procured by a community’s refusal, we must conclude that the ugliness signifies something beyond itself. Pain” (Bernatchez 211). The creature's acts don't represent inherent evil, but rather the anguish and suffering he has experienced as a result of social alienation. His actions are predicated on the knowledge that he is cognizant that humanity as a whole has opted to detest him due to his appearance.
The Creature is furious at Victor for not keeping his promise, and at the likelihood of his like continuing in solitude. The Creature warns Victor that he will be there on his wedding night. Victor is oblivious to the fact that the Creature kills Elizabeth because he is envious of Victor's life in which he will never have. Victor takes no responsibility to provide a good life for his creation that the Monster has no other duty than to torment Victor and show him what his life is like. Until this point, Victor avoided the Monster but now, he dedicates his life to
I was benevolent and good; misery made me fiend. Make me happy and I shall be virtuous” (90-91) In the novel, the creature was shown being helpful to the De Lacys and the little girl who was seen drowning that he saved. That is ultimately besides the point because his negative actions outweigh his positives through the entirety of his life. Overall, many things can be looked at to shift the moral responsibility but overall, due to the creators actions and his diction, he has a moral culpability over the murders
The potential to be evil lives in everyone. Some may claim to live a life without sin, but the temptation of wrongdoing constantly lurks in our environment. With this in mind, if one soul was able to harness the powers of the most villainous monster, they would surely achieve world domination. With this creation, your hopes and dreams will become reality; if you chose to make Friday an international holiday, it could be achieved. In order to concoct such a creature, a strict step-by-step process is required that should ensure an emotionless subject willing to do your deeds.
In the story Frankenstein, Victor is the true villain. Victor was the creator of the monster. Although the creature wasn’t a human, he needed to be parented like one, and Victor did not provide for him. The monster did some pretty horrible things, but Victor could’ve prevented this from the start by going back and helping the monster to learn how to do everyday things. Both Victor and the monster are villains, but it's deciding who is the bigger villain that is important.
In reality, if one is not given a purpose in life and has to fuel themself every day to stay delighted, why would one continue to give to society's wishes? Victor ultimately chose to put the monster on the planet, and it was up to him to teach him the difference between right and wrong. Psychologists believe that 99% of the time, one's malicious behavior stems from the parents, not the child. The monster lashes out at the novel's end, "I shall ascend my funeral pile triumphantly and exult in the agony of the torturing flames. The light of that conflagration will fade away; the winds will sweep my
The creature is no different than humans in the way that humans can kill, be kind or be violent and miserable, which the creature shows and experiences. As the creature learns more he encounters villagers with "gentle manners" and some barbarous villagers" who treat him like trash. If humans are so called humans because of their sympathy and compassion, then humans shouldn 't be considered humans if they kill or become violent. The men the creature meets are just as defective as he becomes. Just like any human around the creature 's "heart was fashioned to be susceptible of love and sympathy", but he also experiences "misery" and "violence" he is "filled with an insatiable thirst for vengeance" (190).
Victor creates the Creature, but there are many situations throughout the novel where the Monster displays as the victim. He seeks love from different people, but everyone treats him bad. His anger towards his father drives him to kill Victor’s family. The Monster later feels devastated for the murders he commits. All the monster wants is love.
Nonetheless,Victor is overwhelmed and instead of caring for the monster, he seeks an easy way out which ultimately leads to the betrayal and abandonment of the creature. Now, the monster is left without care and is filled with anger and sadness as Victor did not take responsibility to look after him. Therefore the monster goes out of rage and kills people that are closest to victor's life. Evidently, all the monster wanted was for Victor to take pride in his work and both care and accept him for the monster that he was. In addition, the monster tried to get near people with hopes of gaining trust and bonds.
The monster ends up asking Victor to create a mate that would be able to keep him company. Victor agrees but ends up not going through with it. This causes the Monster to reach his breaking point. He wants to seek revenge against Victor in hopes to show how much pain and anguish he has so selfishly caused. Although Victor isn’t the one who kills his loved ones, he still feels responsible.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein openly propounds the co-existence of good and evil that yields to inexorable carnage and unrelenting revenge. A maniacal devotion to reason makes Victor the true antagonist of the novel and therefore the real villain in Frankenstein. Victor’s ability to create a life out of lifeless matter unbounded the pious, circumscribed view of God as the creator. Nevertheless, this infringement of propriety leads Victor down a path of revenge, which ultimately sets forth his destruction. Lastly, Victor and the monster are two aspects of the same person.
The idea of vengeance is a central theme in Shelley’s Frankenstein, and the question of where to draw the line is commonly raised throughout the novel. The inability of individuals to take responsibility for their actions, and humanity’s grotesque attempts to pervert nature may suggest that the events that transpired in the text were warranted. On the other hand, it can be called into question whether the destruction of innocent lives for retribution was justifiable or simply reprehensible. So while the Creature’s vengeance against its creator was certainly ruinous, in which innocent people were destroyed in the name of a perceived justice, its actions against Victor are ultimately justifiable as the Creature’s behaviour can easily be traced