Angel Salazar
Mr. Young
English I
Have you made a bad decision, then wondered what the opposite decision would be? In the play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, bad decisions are everywhere. These include the main characters getting married after knowing each other for less than a day, killing themselves, and letting lust run their lives. Nevertheless, even after all these bad decisions some still believe it was fate that led to this tragedy, because Romeo and Juliet would have never met if not for fate. One perspective is that we can't control fate, and the reason for everything is fate. Another interpretation is that there is no such thing as fate, and it was poor decision making that led to this tragedy. While arguments can be
…show more content…
Evidence to support this would be when Romeo and Juliet decide that they have an undying love for each other, on the same night they meet. It is certainly true that this could be seen as a bad decision. However, the fact that Romeo and Juliet met under complete ironic circumstances, helps prove that fate led to the tragedy. How Romeo and Juliet met all started when a servant of the Capulet house asks Romeo to read the list of people to invite to the Capulet party. Shortly after this, the Montague boys plan to go to the party, this is where Romeo meets Juliet. To agree with the poor decision making perspective is to ignore the fact that Romeo and Juliet may have never met if not for that party, the servant not being able to read, or those Montague boys not going. The argument that fate led to this tragedy is consistent with the story.
In the final analysis, fate definitely led to this tragedy. Evidence for this would be when the servant who can't read approaches Romeo and says “God 'i' good e'en. I pray, sir, can you read?” and Romeo says he can and reads the paper to the servant. The servant then invites Romeo to the party saying “Now I’ll tell you without asking. My master is the great rich Capulet, and if you be not of the house of Montagues, I pray come and crush a cup of wine. Rest you merry!”
As you can see, it is more conceivable that fate led to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Next
One reason that the tragedy was due to fate was because at the very beginning, Romeo met a servant of the Capulet family asking Romeo to read something for him. If Romeo hadn't met that servant, he wouldn’t have heard about the Capulets having a party tonight, him going and seeing Juliet. In Act 1 Scene 3, The servant says to Romeo “Now I'll tell you without asking. My master is the great rich Capulet, and if you be not of the house of Montagues, I pray, come and crush a cup of wine. Rest you merry!”
An error within an action is a mistake, a mistake is a thing that most people will regret in the future. Friar Laurence as well as Romeo made many mistakes but some of them went overboard in William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet. It wasn't fate that led to the death of Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet it was the mistakes of Romeo and Friar Laurence. As in the mistake of marrying the two lovers and planning a risky scheme of drinking a sleeping potion from the Friar or even the murder of Tybalt by Romeo Montague. The tragedy in this play is caused by the main actions of Friar Lawrence and Romeo, and not by fate.
One of the most asked questions about the star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet, is “Who is to blame for the untimely deaths of these young lovers?”. The play Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is filled with very influential emotions. The tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet were brought about by many characters such as Lord Capulet, fate and a feud between two families. One of the most substantial characters in Romeo and Juliet is fate. There are many times where Shakespeare leads us to believe that fate is involved with the hapless deaths of Juliet and Romeo.
Some may think it was fate that lead to Romeo and Juliet's death but this is inaccurate because the quote in the prologue "A pair of star cross'd lovers take their life" shows how this is fate. This quote is not accurate because they chose to kill themselves not fate. Fate did not force them to stab and poison
The theme of fate being responsible for Romeo and Juliet’s deaths in the play, Romeo and Juliet. Such as when Friar John was not able to enter Mantua, and transfer Friar Lawrence’s letter to Romeo. However, instances like this one are misleading, as the “star-crossed lovers” hold responsibility for their ultimate demise. Romeo and Juliet’s ultimate deaths were an inauspicious side effect of their own actions, rather than fate, because they were far too passionate, demonstrated suicidal tendencies long before their suicides, and made very brash decisions. Romeo and Juliet’s passion for one another was a component that led to their final moments.
When I say fate I mean bad timing. Events in the play that happened with terrible timing were lord Capulet moving the wedding date, the quarantine of the city, and Juliet waking up too late all of these events also led to Romeo and Juliet’s death. Lord Capulet moving the wedding date earlier gave Romeo, Juliet, and Friar Lawrence less time to come up with a good plan to get Juliet out of the marriage with Paris and it also pressured them. The quarantine of the city is very bad timing because Friar John couldn't give Romeo the letter informing him about the plan and that Juliet was not dead (5.2.5-16). Even Friar Lawrence could tell that something bad was going to happen because of fate when he said, “Unhappy fortune.
Fate also led Romeo and Juliet to death. Additionally, everything happens for a reason. Romeo and Juliet were destined to meet and fall in love. Friar Lawrence is the second most to blame. In Doc C, Friar says ¨So smile the heavens upon this holy act...
In the beginning of the book is where the smallest thing started it all. While Romeo was in town, he was approached by an illiterate Capulet servant named Peter. Romeo was asked to read the guest list for a Capulet party to Peter, because Peter didn’t know how to read. “I pray, sir, can you read?” After reading the list,
Are people in control of their destiny? Having no power over one’s destiny is an important theme in William Shakespeare’s, Romeo and Juliet. We are in told in the prologue that fate is going to drive the story. Romeo and Juliet are not in control of their lives. It is predetermined destiny, not free choice that manipulates the lives of these two lovers.
People are always looking for someone to blame. It is no different when they read the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. There are many differing beliefs as to who is to blame for the deaths of the ill-fated young lovers, but the truth is that it was not one single person who determined what happened to Romeo and Juliet. Fate is to blame for the deaths of the teenage couple because it predetermined their unavoidable deaths, rushed the time span of the story, and put all of the characters into countless coincidental situations. No person in the story of Romeo and Juliet can be blamed for their deaths because Fate already predetermined their unavoidable deaths.
William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is a perfect example of how poor choices don’t only affect one’s own futures but also those of their communities. Romeo and Juliet fall in love despite their families, the Montagues and the Capulets, being enemies. The two marry in secret and plan to live a happy life together before a deadly fight breaks out between the Montagues and the Capulets and the lovers are separated. The heartbreaking story consists of risky decisions and bad timing. Romeo’s own impulsive nature, demonstrated when he kills Juliet’s kinsman, breaks Verona’s law of banishment, and suicidal act, all contribute to the tragic end of Romeo and Juliet.
Fate is just a way to be rude to someone with a reasoning behind it. The family feud is also responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Juliet struggles with knowing the difference between loving Romeo and that he is an enemy to her family.
Was it fate or free will that killed Romeo and Juliet? In the prologue of this play, Shakespeare refers to Romeo and Juliet as “A pair of star-cross'd lovers.” Star crossed lovers are people whose love is destined to end in tragedy. Free will is when people are able to make their own decisions and have consequences based off their decisions instead of predetermined consequences. Fate was definitely the reason for Romeo and Juliet’s tragic deaths because of the unexplainable coincidences, uncharacterized choices, and conscious decisions that all lead to the same inescapable outcome.
Verona, a city in which a pair of “star-crossed lovers” and all of its citizens overall, blame the “greater power,” fate, to veil their own actions. Fate and free will, both play a major part in Romeo and Juliet. However, only one of the two is actually true. On one side, fate supposedly controls the character’s destiny. But they are completely unaware that it is actually their free will and their own actions in which they are in control of.
The theme of Fate vs. Free Will is dominant in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet; however the theme of fate is more significant than free will. In the play both Romeo and Juliet meeting was contributed by fate as Shakespeare mentioned in the prologue that Romeo and Juliet were star-crossed lovers that were meant to meet, fall in love and their death would be the reason for the feud to end between the two families. Fate was the reason Capulet’s servant asked Romeo and Benvolio to help him read the invitation for him that contained all the names of the people that were invited to the ball Capulet hosted. “…If you be not of the house of Montagues, I pray come and crush a cup of wine.